On 23 Sep 2011, at 20:46, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-09-23 03:30 PM, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
From first principles if one starts with the notion that everyone should see
light as travelling at the same speed, then a simple derivation naturally
leads to the Lorenz contraction
Peter, that is just utterly untrue! In scientific steam experiments all that
is required to measure is the steam pressure, because steam pressure
correlates with the total enthalpy. Then it is needed only to calibrate this
correlation e.g. with steam sparging tests. Clean, fast, unlimited,
- Original Nachricht
Von: Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 26.09.2011 10:38
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Rossi steam calorimetry
Peter, that is just utterly untrue! In scientific steam experiments all
that
is required to measure is the steam
- Original Nachricht
Von: peter.heck...@arcor.de
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 26.09.2011 11:06
Betreff: Aw: Re: [Vo]:Rossi steam calorimetry
For example they could give a upside down shape of an U to the hose and
make it from transparent silicone.
Put this arrangement
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
But on the other
hand, how many really knows why do we even cook food instead of eating raw
food? Tastes better?
Evolutionary, My dear Watson. Cooking food kills parasites and
bacteria, a survival trait.
T
2011/9/26 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
wrote:
But on the other
hand, how many really knows why do we even cook food instead of eating raw
food? Tastes better?
Evolutionary, My dear Watson. Cooking food kills
- Original Nachricht
Von: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 26.09.2011 14:56
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Rossi steam calorimetry
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
wrote:
But on the other
hand, how many
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/26 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
wrote:
But on the other
hand, how many really knows why do we even cook food instead of eating
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:20 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Cooking cracks those cell membranes that the human digestion system cannot
crack.
It makes food digestible that otherwise is not digestible.
It also transforms poisons in some vegetables an tubers expanding what
may be
2011/9/26 peter.heck...@arcor.de:
Von: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
wrote:
But on the other
hand, how many really knows why do we even cook food instead of eating
raw
food? Tastes better?
Evolutionary,
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
This increases the digestibility of of food by a lot. This is because the
energetic cost of digestion will be reduced greatly, because we can come
along with smaller gut and shorter chewing time, but also we can get much
more energy from the food
Ah, I see that Terry has already posted a link to this book. Great minds
think alike.
- Jed
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
First, let me say, despite the casual, inaccurate, and one data point
nature of the method shown, it is far better than any calorimetry applied in
Rossi public demos.
I agree it is better for steam. It is the only reasonable way to measure a
2011/9/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
I suggested that they combine this method
with other methods because this only produces one data point per test. It
only works when power is stable. So you need another method to be sure that
it is stable.
We need to hope that Brian Josephson
The text quoted by Passerini was from a letter from Levi inviting
Brian Josephson to participate and not Brian Josephson's own words.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Sep 25, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
This got just posted on
The text quoted by Passerini was from a letter from Levi inviting Brian
Josephson to participate and not Brian Josephson's own words.
If was Levi, then This is NOT an official test of the University of Bologna
because the contract is not active yet. make sense.
-Messaggio
Right. Josephson says he has no intention of doing a test at present. This
was a mixup.
The text quoted by Passerini was from a letter from Levi inviting
Brian Josephson to participate and not Brian Josephson's own words.
- Jed
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, stirring is the problem. You need to stir vigorously with a stick or
something like a Dremel tool with a paint mixer attached. (Like a giant
eggbeater.)
That is untrue, it is not a problem. It really does not need much
efforts to stir
On 2011-09-26 19:51, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Right. Josephson says he has no intention of doing a test at present.
This was a mixup.
The odd thing (or maybe not?) is that Andrea Rossi didn't catch this
inaccuracy. As I've written in my opening post, Passerini reportedly
consulted with him before
It is nice to see our views so closely aligned. My comments are
mainly additive.
On Sep 26, 2011, at 6:39 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
First, let me say, despite the casual, inaccurate, and one data
point nature of the method shown, it is far
See:
http://www.slate.com/id/2304442/
This article references Martin Ford's Lights in the Tunnel which was
discussed here.
- Jed
On Sep 26, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-09-26 19:51, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Right. Josephson says he has no intention of doing a test at present.
This was a mixup.
The odd thing (or maybe not?) is that Andrea Rossi didn't catch
this inaccuracy. As I've written in my
On 2011-09-26 19:51, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Right. Josephson says he has no intention of doing a test at present.
This was a mixup.
By his latest comments on that blog post, I see that Passerini
acknowledges that there has been a mixup on this part. It was just an
invitation that Josephson had
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
It is nice to see our views so closely aligned.
They are indeed.
I think running the steam and water through a condensing heat exchanger
works very well, provided *all* the flow and temperature variables are
recorded very frequently - more
On 2011-09-26 20:54, Horace Heffner wrote:
Rossi states on the Passerini blog (translated by google): It seems
appropriate to emphasize that [...]
Quite a mixup! What is going on with NASA? Is that another mixup?
The text you quoted (It seems appropriate [...] in a good 24 hours!)
is from
Am 26.09.2011 20:58, schrieb Akira Shirakawa:
On 2011-09-26 19:51, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Right. Josephson says he has no intention of doing a test at present.
This was a mixup.
By his latest comments on that blog post, I see that Passerini
acknowledges that there has been a mixup on this part.
2011/9/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, stirring is the problem. You need to stir vigorously with a stick
or
something like a Dremel tool with a paint mixer attached. (Like a giant
eggbeater.)
That is untrue, it is not a
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Professor Bjoern Palm
http://www.kth.se/en/itm/inst/energiteknik/Forskning/ett/personal/bjorn-palm-1.20386
who was interviewed by NyTeknik, would be a god candidate.
A delightful typo!
T
2011/9/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
This article references Martin Ford's Lights in the Tunnel which was
discussed here.
I have not yet read the article, but one short comment about the topic.
That robots are stealing our jobs is not an issue, because we can tax
robots and give
Jouni sez:
This article references Martin Ford's Lights in the Tunnel which was
discussed here.
I have not yet read the article, but one short comment about the topic.
That robots are stealing our jobs is not an issue, because we can tax
robots and give money to the poor as a basic income.
Louis Kelso foresaw the automation issue decades ago. See Second Incomes for
All at www.aesopinstitute.org
A Capital Homestead Act has been proposed that grew directly out of his ideas
regarding a way to deal with the problem.
From: OrionWorks - Steven V
http://www.wimp.com/toroidalvortices/
Mostly entertaining. Sometimes frightening.
Steam quality not applicable. :-)
T
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 26.09.2011 20:58, schrieb Akira Shirakawa:
On 2011-09-26 19:51, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Right. Josephson says he has no intention of doing a test at
present.
This was a mixup.
By his latest comments on that blog post, I see that Passerini
Steven, you are refering to value add tax with that employment tax. There
is no resistance for value add tax in europe and it is commonly ca. 20%.
Many people however argue that the proportion should be increased because it
is unethical to tax incomes. Some even think that all tax revenues should
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-09-26 20:54, Horace Heffner wrote:
Rossi states on the Passerini blog (translated by google): It seems
appropriate to emphasize that [...]
Quite a mixup! What is going on with NASA? Is that another mixup?
The text you quoted
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
It is nice to see our views so closely aligned.
They are indeed.
I think running the steam and water through a condensing heat
exchanger works very well, provided *all* the flow and temperature
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 6:29:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Will Robots Steal Your Job?
Robots will never earn any income.
Are you sure a robot could never be
Some corrected thoughts.
For the secondary circuit only one flow meter is needed, and two
thermometers. For the primary circuit, input and output flow meters
should be used, and two thermometers. It is important not to assume
the pump outputs at a constant rate against all pressures into
I wrote: The nice thing about this approach for the 1 MW E-cat is
all that is needed for cooling is a 5 gal/min pump, some big hose,
and a lake or river.
That should have said: The nice thing about this approach for the 1
MW E-cat is all that is needed for cooling is a 200 gal/min pump,
39 matches
Mail list logo
