Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0903/0903.5359.pdf *A New Method of Obtaining High Enrichment of Metallic Single-* *Walled Carbon Nanotubes* * * http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/13361/1/IJCA%2051A(01-02)%2032-46.pdf Selective Synthesis of SWNT On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote: ** I read these patents and most of it is beyond my ability and skill. And they're mostly about how to produce SWNTs, which no distinction between the Metallic SWNTs from the Semiconducting SWNT varieties. I've found many papers discussing production of SWNTs as opposed to MWNTs, but I found only 2 papers discussing the Selective Production of Metallic SWNTs. They're both from the same author and it was a very short paper and he does not really discuss how to do it in detail. Do you know of any papers discussing the selective production of Metallic SWNTs? I think this is the key in increasing the power density of LENR. With respect to the smaller SWNTs the better. In your understanding, why would a smaller (diameter?) SWNT be better than one which is slightly bigger. Any quantum mechanical reason that you can explain? Can you direct me to any papers discussing Charge accumulation in SWNTs? Jojo - Original Message - *From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com *Sent:* Saturday, June 23, 2012 8:49 AM *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation I found about 1000 patents using the compound keywords…… Metallic AND SWNT On Google patents, use the “Download PDF” button to see the complete patent including the diagrams. This looked good to me on a quick scan of the material. http://www.google.com/patents/US8163263 I found 134 patents using the compound keywords…… Armchair AND SWNT This looked good to me on a quick scan of the material. http://www.google.com/patents?id=pyz5AQAAEBAJprintsec=frontcoverdq=8,038,795hl=ensa=Xei=Ig7lT7jdCoHn0QG-mInWCQved=0CDcQ6AEwAA Also http://www.google.com/patents/US7807127 *Just thinking out loud here, but do you think the size of the Fe or Ni nanopowders used as catalyst seed material might influence the creation of Armchair SWNTs.* I think this is true and the smaller the particle, the more active the SWNT formed from it will be. I will get you more as time permits. On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote: ** Axil, I found a page discussing the properties of SWNTs and it mentions that Metallic SWNTs exhibit Long Coherence Lengths. http://ipn2.epfl.ch/CHBU/NTelectronic1.htm From the page: Numerous experiments on SWNTs and MWNTs allowed to gain additional informations. At low temperatures, SWNTs behave as coherent quantum wires where the conduction occurs through discrete electron states over large distances. Transport measurements revealed that metallic SWNTs show extremely long coherence lengths and that the presence of defects or disorder has little influence on electron conduction. This is not the case for semi-conducting SWNTs, which show far shorter coherence lengths. Is this the same concept you were referring to in your post about charge accumulation in 1D structures. If so, it appears that SWNTs are better than MWNTs; specifically Metallic SWNTs appears to be the right allotropes that would enchance Charge accumulation. And since, arc discharge generators normally produce a mixture of Metallic and Semiconducting SWNTs, it would explain the hit and miss results we been getting with Cold Fusion. If this is correct, tuning the reactor to bias its production towards Metallic SWNTs should increase power production in LENR. Any ideas how to do this? I understand that doping the anode with Fe or Ni powders increases the production of SWNTs, I can tune my reactor towards SWNT production, but it seems, nobody knows how to tune production of the Metallic SWNTs variety over the Semiconducting Variety. That is, Armchair nanotubes as opposed to ZigZag or other chirals. Just thinking out loud here, but do you think the size of the Fe or Ni nanopowders used as catalyst seed material might influence the creation of Armchair SWNTs. Can you direct me to papers about SWNT charge accumulation. Jojo
Re: [Vo]:US government patents LENR
This is an interesting patent that I hope is important to LENR power production. Has the existence of heavy electrons that can interact with protons and generate neutrons been proven at this juncture? Have actual gamma rays been shown to be absorbed by these systems to the degree that is necessary if we are to see all of them in every direction eliminated? I suspect that a lot of this push toward heavy electron involvement is based upon much speculation. Perhaps it is true and we can all go celibate at the nearest pub soon, but too many loose ends keep nagging me. Can we assume that now that NASA has become interested in LENR that progress will rapidly begin? If they do put forth far more effort than before I hope that they do not become disillusioned when this pet theory is proven incorrect. It would be in the best interest of everyone for them and other researchers to continue on as many possible fronts as arise since no one really can be sure that this particular mechanism is the best and only one operating. The recent paper by Dr. Storms is a fine example of another possible mechanism that needs to be fleshed out. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Jun 24, 2012 2:29 am Subject: [Vo]:US government patents LENR http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZawodnyJmethodforp.pdf METHOD FOR PRODUCING HEAVY ELECTRONS The US government patents LENR covering particles, whiskers, dusty plasmas with the ultimate goal of producing heavy electrons and associated low energy neutrons.
[Vo]:Deconstructing the Hexane/Propane Flat Plate Heat Exchanger Process
Hello Gang, Based on my understanding of this process from the very limited information about this process, I believe I have identified the heat source of the process. I do not believe the heat source is LENR. The following is based on my understanding of the procedure. 1. Spark Plug on T, fired by an AC source or buzz (doorbell) 2. Propane flow thru this Tee fittings towards the Flat Plate Heat Exchanger (FPHE). Presumably, excess Propane flows out the other port towards the atmosphere. 3. On the other side of the FPHE, water is pumped in and Vigorous Steam is observed coming out. 4. No mention of spark rate, propane flow rate, water flow rate or steam flow rate or how dry the steam is. Since the claim is that vigorous steam is seen. It is safe to assume that wet steam is seen as dry steam is invisible. 5. Claim that the process is operating at 650C. 6. No mention on whether the reaction in constant or whether the steam output fluctuates. 7. Cotton swab on the Tee fitting reveals black soot. It appears from the statement that very little black soot is being produced. Based on these observations, I can draw the following hypothesis: 1. The sparking of propane appears to produce very little black soot. This is consistent with results from the free standing sparking of a hydrocarbon gas. It appears very little nanotubes are being formed. Formation of nanotubes will result in significant quantities of web like black substances on the Cathode and distributed on the reactor wall. This process appears to produce none of this. Besides, AC excitation to produce an arc WILL NOT produce Carbon Nanotubes. The nanotubes need to attach to the cathode for it to grow. AC excitation will blow it all over the place preventing growth. 2. The claim that the process operates at 650c appears to be inconsistent with what we know about these FPHE. Copper brazed FPHE of the kind being sold by dudadiesel are not designed to operate at 650c. Operating at such high temperatures and pressure will delaminate the individual plates apart since they are only brazed with copper. Copper quickly loses its strength at these temperatures. It is not unusual for copper to loose 90% of its rated tensile strength at these temperatures. Hence, a FPHE rated at 400c and 300 psi would degrade to 30psi at 650c. If you are familiar with FPHE design, you will notice that certain areas are sealed by as little as 2 mm of brazed copper. It does not appear that this can withstand 650c and the corresponding steam pressure at these temps. 3. Propane rate flow is not mentioned. Hence, it is possible that very little propane is flowing into the FPHE. If that is the case, there would be negative pressure on the FPHE at certain times that would suck in outside air. The outside oxygen would then chemically react with propane to produce the heat. And since we don't know the rate of water flow, we can not really tell how much energy is being produced. Let me know where I'm wrong. The Hexane/Propane process by Mint appears to be valid at first glance. But looking deeper at the process reveals several engineering inconsistencies. I was prompted to study this process in detail and now, I don't know what to believe. Right now, I am once again leaning towards Baloney for this process. But, I am willing to be wrong once again and I reserve the right to change my mind. That after all is the essence of scientific discovery. Jojo
Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation
Nah! If Axil owned a company close to commercialization, he wouldn't be so generous in sharing his understanding. If he did, he will quickly lose any market advantage. Axil is just one all around nice fellow for sharing his knowledge. If his theories pan out and I am able to commercial my design, I know where to send a very generous thank you. Jojo - Original Message - From: integral.property.serv...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 1:52 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation With your Mensa mind, Axil, we must assume that you already own a company just about ready to market a high pressure boiler fuel insert. N'est-ce *pas*? Will you offer start up shares? Where can I join the investor waiting list? Looking forward to an offering where minimum five figures is required. Warm Regards, Reliable
Re: [Vo]:US government patents LENR
It would appear the government has a double standard regarding cold fusion patents. On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:57 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: This is an interesting patent that I hope is important to LENR power production. Has the existence of heavy electrons that can interact with protons and generate neutrons been proven at this juncture? Have actual gamma rays been shown to be absorbed by these systems to the degree that is necessary if we are to see all of them in every direction eliminated? I suspect that a lot of this push toward heavy electron involvement is based upon much speculation. Perhaps it is true and we can all go celibate at the nearest pub soon, but too many loose ends keep nagging me. Can we assume that now that NASA has become interested in LENR that progress will rapidly begin? If they do put forth far more effort than before I hope that they do not become disillusioned when this pet theory is proven incorrect. It would be in the best interest of everyone for them and other researchers to continue on as many possible fronts as arise since no one really can be sure that this particular mechanism is the best and only one operating. The recent paper by Dr. Storms is a fine example of another possible mechanism that needs to be fleshed out. Dave http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZawodnyJmethodforp.pdf -Original Message- From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Jun 24, 2012 2:29 am Subject: [Vo]:US government patents LENR http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZawodnyJmethodforp.pdf METHOD FOR PRODUCING HEAVY ELECTRONS The US government patents LENR covering particles, whiskers, dusty plasmas with the ultimate goal of producing heavy electrons and associated low energy neutrons.
RE: [Vo]:US government patents LENR
Dave typo'd: . and we can all go celibate at the nearest pub soon. celibate = abstaining from sex; I thought the whole purpose of going to the pub was not to celibate? J -m From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 8:57 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:US government patents LENR This is an interesting patent that I hope is important to LENR power production. Has the existence of heavy electrons that can interact with protons and generate neutrons been proven at this juncture? Have actual gamma rays been shown to be absorbed by these systems to the degree that is necessary if we are to see all of them in every direction eliminated? I suspect that a lot of this push toward heavy electron involvement is based upon much speculation. Perhaps it is true and we can all go celibate at the nearest pub soon, but too many loose ends keep nagging me. Can we assume that now that NASA has become interested in LENR that progress will rapidly begin? If they do put forth far more effort than before I hope that they do not become disillusioned when this pet theory is proven incorrect. It would be in the best interest of everyone for them and other researchers to continue on as many possible fronts as arise since no one really can be sure that this particular mechanism is the best and only one operating. The recent paper by Dr. Storms is a fine example of another possible mechanism that needs to be fleshed out. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Jun 24, 2012 2:29 am Subject: [Vo]:US government patents LENR http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZawodnyJmethodforp.pdf http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZawodnyJmethodforp.pdf METHOD FOR PRODUCING HEAVY ELECTRONS The US government patents LENR covering particles, whiskers, dusty plasmas with the ultimate goal of producing heavy electrons and associated low energy neutrons.
Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation
Jojo,What are you talking about: Ther is no original message on vortex-lHidekiSNIP Jojo- Original Message -From: integral.property.serv...@gmail.com To: "vortex-l" vortex-l@eskimo.comSent: Monday, June 25, 2012 1:52 AMSubject: Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge AccumulationWith your Mensa mind, Axil, we must assume that you already own a company just about ready to market a high pressure boiler fuel insert. N'est-ce *pas*? Will you offer start up shares? Where can I join the investor waiting list? Looking forward to an offering where minimum five figures is required. Warm Regards,Reliable
Re: [Vo]:Lost email in a Retrograde Mailing lIst system (was:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation)
There was an original message from Reliable. I responded to it. Many times, the Vortex Mailing List system loses email. It happens a lot where you receive an email that does not show up on the Web Interface and vice versa. This is the Mailing List system that I have been lamenting about for quite a while now. I have sent pleadings to Bill to convert but I am hitting a brick wall. There is too much opposition from old farts here to convert to a Forum format to solve this dissappearing messages problem among others. Anyways, that is something we have to put up with. Pretty soon, my patience with this retrograde mailing list system will exhaust itself and I'll post somewhere else. Now that I know Axil posts over at the Polywell site, I'll spend more time there. Jojo - Original Message - From: c...@inbox.lv To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 2:25 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation Jojo, What are you talking about: Ther is no original message on vortex-l Hideki SNIP Jojo- Original Message -From: integral.property.serv...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.comSent: Monday, June 25, 2012 1:52 AMSubject: Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge AccumulationWith your Mensa mind, Axil, we must assume that you already own a company just about ready to market a high pressure boiler fuel insert. N'est-ce *pas*? Will you offer start up shares? Where can I join the investor waiting list? Looking forward to an offering where minimum five figures is required. Warm Regards,Reliable
Re: [Vo]:US government patents LENR
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:57:24 -0400 (EDT): Hi, In private email with someone not from this list, someone suggested to me that the WL theory was the beast candidate so far for an explanation of CF. I would suggest rather that it is the theory most easily accepted by the mainstream because it requires that they make the least adjustment to their current way of thinking. God forbid that they should have been totally wrong their entire lives. The dent to their egos would be just too much to bear. ;) [snip] This is an interesting patent that I hope is important to LENR power production. Has the existence of heavy electrons that can interact with protons and generate neutrons been proven at this juncture? Have actual gamma rays been shown to be absorbed by these systems to the degree that is necessary if we are to see all of them in every direction eliminated? I suspect that a lot of this push toward heavy electron involvement is based upon much speculation. Perhaps it is true and we can all go celibate at the nearest pub soon, but too many loose ends keep nagging me. Can we assume that now that NASA has become interested in LENR that progress will rapidly begin? If they do put forth far more effort than before I hope that they do not become disillusioned when this pet theory is proven incorrect. It would be in the best interest of everyone for them and other researchers to continue on as many possible fronts as arise since no one really can be sure that this particular mechanism is the best and only one operating. The recent paper by Dr. Storms is a fine example of another possible mechanism that needs to be fleshed out. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Jun 24, 2012 2:29 am Subject: [Vo]:US government patents LENR http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZawodnyJmethodforp.pdf METHOD FOR PRODUCING HEAVY ELECTRONS The US government patents LENR covering particles, whiskers, dusty plasmas with the ultimate goal of producing heavy electrons and associated low energy neutrons. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:Is OPEC afraid of synfuels?
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:02:57 -0400: Hi, [snip] The total US yearly manure production capacity is about 2,100,000,000 tons. The MSOP can accomidate the 40% moisture content of which 1,260,000,000 tons of dry content is estimated. ..but most of this manure is spread across grazing lands, not conveniently collected in feedlots. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
[Vo]:test
Is this getting through? svj
Re: [Vo]:test
No, try again. T On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: Is this getting through? svj
Re: [Vo]:test
Eskimo.com is replacing the mail server with new h/w and s/w. Some hiccups have been experienced of late; but, patience will be a virtue. T On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: No, try again. T On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: Is this getting through? svj
Re: [Vo]:Sagnac effect, optical gyroscope lock-in
The MM device does not rotate, right? T On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:36 AM, David Jonsson davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for this reference. I thought lock in was also present in a optical fiber gyroscope or any type. Now I realize that the differences are big between different types of interferometers. Are you sure it is not involved in other types? What do you base your conclusion on that it isn't involved in the MM-interferometer? David On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:08 AM, David Jonsson davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Can someone refer me to the lock-in effect in optical gyroscopes? I have also heard the effect being mentioned as a phase lock loop effect. Could lock-in effect also be present in a straight interferometer like a Michelson-Morley-interferometer? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_laser_gyroscope end I don't think it relates to the MM experiment. T
RE: [Vo]:test
Drat! I'm trying to send a post in HTML format because it contains some font changes to make it easier to read some formulas. I got it down to under 40k but Vortex-l still doesn't like it. Oh, well... I'll send it in raw text format. Screw the fancy fonts! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
[Vo]:Groking CoAM, Kepler and Rossi
INTRODUCTION: What do you do when you are trying to grasp the fundamentals of a well-known physics equation, an equation you had not been formally taught it in school? Wikipedia, of course! But what happens if what Wikipedia has to say on the subject confuses you even more? You do your best to reason out the fundamental elements that comprise the equation on your own recognizance. You hope that what you come up with will somehow miraculously match up with what the academic textbooks have to say on the subject. The process of discovery can occasionally lead to surprising conclusions, especially when you get around to comparing notes with what the priesthood of physics has to say on the subject. You might discover the fact that while your version of the equation seems to posses fundamental differences when compared to what is formally laid out in the textbooks, what you came up with nevertheless seems to explain the phenomenon in exactly the same way. Not only that you can use your own equation to make the exact same predictions. This recently happened to me while trying to grok a well know algebraic formula, the Conservation of Angular Momentum, or CoAM. It is intimately related to my on-going study of Celestial Mechanics through the use of computer simulation. Here's one of my prior posts pertaining to personal research I've done in the field made back in March of 2012: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg64010.html While continuing my research I eventually realized I needed to understand the fundamentals of CoAM because I came to realize that the equation is an essential part of the physics that helps explain how Celestial Mechanics (CM) behaves. CoAM helps explain why a satellite orbiting a gravitational mass, like a planetary body, typically assumes the path of an ellipse where one of the foci is located at the center of the planetary body. Why does the velocity of an orbiting satellite as it swoops away from the planetary mass slow down? CoAM explains it. Why does the satellite's velocity speed up dramatically during the return phase. Again CoAM explains the reason why. What is even more astonishing is why does the speeding satellite after it has made its nearest approach break away? How can that possibly happen? Why doesn't it crash into the planetary body since the gravitational influence being felt would be at its greatest strength? Again, CoAM explains why that doesn't happen. I would conjecture that exactly how CoAM constantly comes to the rescue is not necessarily that well groked by most folks, including physicists. I certainly didn't understand nor appreciate the incredible dance of physics that is involved, not until I started taking a long hard look. It is my hope that how I finally learned to grok CoAM might help others who may also occasionally feel disenfranchised from what traditional physics books might have to say on similar subjects. The experience lead me to a belief that there may turn out to be many roads that lead to the Grand City of Rome. Not only that, sometimes traveling down a less beaten path can have its own unique surprises and rewards. I suspect Andrea Rossi is a perfect example of such an individual who found his own unique pathway to the City of Rome. I suspect he chose a road rarely travelled by others. The path he chose could possibly end up turning the world of physics upside down - assuming his eCats really do work, and perhaps most important of all, he gets the chance to sell them en masse to the world. MY SEARCH FOR COAM BEGINS: Initially I tried reading what Wikipedia had to say on the subject. The authors weren't of much help to me. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_angular_momentum#Conservation_o f_angular_momentum http://tinyurl.com/yf28c7l Something was missing. Nowhere in the all of the turgid mathematical equations that had been written down was there the slightest hint of a squared value. That bothered me. It bothered me because of my own extensive computer simulation research into Celestial Mechanics, of how orbital bodies are attracted to a central gravitational mass. I was also acutely aware of Kepler's most famous law concerning planetary motion, his 2nd law which states: A line joining a planet and the Sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time Kepler's 2nd law introduces a constant that manifests in our three-dimensional universe in the form of a flat and fixed 2-dimensional piece of area. No matter what shape that flat patch of area assumes the amount of area remains constant. First a qwik refresher course on area. An area, such as a rectangle, is determined by multiplying two 1 dimensional lengths held at 90 degrees to each other. It is often expressed as: area = x * y. If, as sometimes happens, x = y, representing a square, then you can simplify the rectangular equation to: area = x^2. There was the squared value! Based on my own experience of working with computer simulations of
Re: [Vo]:test
Post it in docs.google.com T On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:15 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: Drat! I'm trying to send a post in HTML format because it contains some font changes to make it easier to read some formulas. I got it down to under 40k but Vortex-l still doesn't like it. Oh, well... I'll send it in raw text format. Screw the fancy fonts! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:US government patents LENR
Oh my, guess I used a bad word! I hope that you guys will forgive me for such a terrible suggestion. Dave -Original Message- From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Jun 24, 2012 1:49 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:US government patents LENR Dave typo’d: “… and we can all go celibate at the nearest pub soon…” celibate = abstaining from sex; I thought the whole purpose of going to the pub was not to celibate? J -m From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 8:57 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:US government patents LENR This is an interesting patent that I hope is important to LENR power production. Has the existence of heavy electrons that can interact with protons and generate neutrons been proven at this juncture? Have actual gamma rays been shown to be absorbed by these systems to the degree that is necessary if we are to see all of them in every direction eliminated? I suspect that a lot of this push toward heavy electron involvement is based upon much speculation. Perhaps it is true and we can all go celibate at the nearest pub soon, but too many loose ends keep nagging me. Can we assume that now that NASA has become interested in LENR that progress will rapidly begin? If they do put forth far more effort than before I hope that they do not become disillusioned when this pet theory is proven incorrect. It would be in the best interest of everyone for them and other researchers to continue on as many possible fronts as arise since no one really can be sure that this particular mechanism is the best and only one operating. The recent paper by Dr. Storms is a fine example of another possible mechanism that needs to be fleshed out. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Jun 24, 2012 2:29 am Subject: [Vo]:US government patents LENR http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZawodnyJmethodforp.pdf METHOD FOR PRODUCING HEAVY ELECTRONS The US government patents LENR covering particles, whiskers, dusty plasmas with the ultimate goal of producing heavy electrons and associated low energy neutrons.
RE: [Vo]:test
Do a screen capture of the equations and simply attach that as a JPG to your vortex posting... if black text on white, it should compress to a fairly small JPG. -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 3:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:test Post it in docs.google.com T On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:15 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: Drat! I'm trying to send a post in HTML format because it contains some font changes to make it easier to read some formulas. I got it down to under 40k but Vortex-l still doesn't like it. Oh, well... I'll send it in raw text format. Screw the fancy fonts! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation
Hideki,Here is missing post:Axil, Google *vale nickel powder carbonyl*. Revisit http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg49505.html (Brilliant analysis!). In addition, I read or heard Rossi ridicule possible shortage of Ni powder but can not pick up on specific reference. It appears that proper preparation, purification and handling are essential. See http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg45727.html and http://www.uibm.gov.it/uibm/dati/Titolare.aspx?load=info_list_unoid=1933570table=Invention#ancoraSearch “Method and Apparatus for Generating Energy through Nuclear Reactions of Hydrogen Adsorbed by Orbital Capture to a Metal Crystalline Nanostructure”, et alia. You commented on this previously. See Axil : http://www.talk-polywell.org/bb/viewtopic.php?p=67616sid=a67427fd867eb1b9b08913e1b77ed98e With your Mensa mind, Axil, we must assume that you already own a company just about ready to market a high pressure boiler fuel insert. N'est-ce *pas*? Will you offer start up shares? Where can I join the investor waiting list? Looking forward to an offering where minimum five figures is required. Warm Regards, Reliable Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:25:40 -0700 Jojo,What are you talking about: Ther is no original message on vortex-lHidekiSNIP Jojo- Original Message -From: integral.property.serv...@gmail.com To: "vortex-l" vortex-l@eskimo.comSent: Monday, June 25, 2012 1:52 AMSubject: Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge AccumulationWith your Mensa mind, Axil, we must assume that you already own a company just about ready to market a high pressure boiler fuel insert. N'est-ce *pas*? Will you offer start up shares? Where can I join the investor waiting list? Looking forward to an offering where minimum five figures is required. Warm Regards,Reliable Thank you Reliable for the excellent references.. Axil is hidden and probably will never disclose background. See http://www.technologyreview.com/profile/Axil/ Anonymous
Re: [Vo]:Groking CoAM, Kepler and Rossi
Bravo Steven, it sounds like you have been having a good time in your path of discovery. I find myself in the same boat on occasions where I discover something that is new to me but then I find that it has been documented by others and recently wikipedia has been my worst foe. At least you and I have the satisfaction of knowing that we are venturing into the unknown. I like to think of my new concepts as suggesting that I could have been there first, but was not. Regardless of the timing, it is mind opening to venture into these types of studies. Much is learned about the natural world by actually exploring interesting concepts. When the pieces fall together we get a better view of the entire picture that tends to remain in our memories far longer than one can recall a equation. And as you suggest, unusual modifications from the original well known paths lead to interesting observations that might not make sense at the first look. I have a tendency to think differently than others about natural phenomenon. You appear to exhibit that curse as well! This type of reasoning has served me well in the past when I have solved extremely complicated problems that have been unresolved for months until an unorthodox idea appears. The more we think about things in a different manner, the more likely it is to stumble upon these wondrous ideas. Keep stressing your mind as it is extremely good for you. A number of years ago I played chess with some very good players and I suspect that you may have done the same. That should be a requirement for guys and gals that want to enter into the engineering or science fields in the future. The deep planning necessary to play chess at a reasonable level is greatly advantageous for problem solving. I find the CoE as a very useful guide as well. That along with the CoM, coupled with a observation reference change can make many problems become much more transparent. I wish you good fortune my friend. Dave -Original Message- From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Jun 24, 2012 6:25 pm Subject: [Vo]:Groking CoAM, Kepler and Rossi INTRODUCTION: What do you do when you are trying to grasp the fundamentals of a well-known hysics equation, an equation you had not been formally taught it in school? ikipedia, of course! But what happens if what Wikipedia has to say on the ubject confuses you even more? You do your best to reason out the undamental elements that comprise the equation on your own recognizance. ou hope that what you come up with will somehow miraculously match up with hat the academic textbooks have to say on the subject. The process of discovery can occasionally lead to surprising conclusions, specially when you get around to comparing notes with what the priesthood f physics has to say on the subject. You might discover the fact that while our version of the equation seems to posses fundamental differences when ompared to what is formally laid out in the textbooks, what you came up ith nevertheless seems to explain the phenomenon in exactly the same way. ot only that you can use your own equation to make the exact same redictions. This recently happened to me while trying to grok a well know algebraic ormula, the Conservation of Angular Momentum, or CoAM. It is intimately elated to my on-going study of Celestial Mechanics through the use of omputer simulation. Here's one of my prior posts pertaining to personal esearch I've done in the field made back in March of 2012: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg64010.html While continuing my research I eventually realized I needed to understand he fundamentals of CoAM because I came to realize that the equation is an ssential part of the physics that helps explain how Celestial Mechanics CM) behaves. CoAM helps explain why a satellite orbiting a gravitational ass, like a planetary body, typically assumes the path of an ellipse where ne of the foci is located at the center of the planetary body. Why does the elocity of an orbiting satellite as it swoops away from the planetary mass low down? CoAM explains it. Why does the satellite's velocity speed up ramatically during the return phase. Again CoAM explains the reason why. hat is even more astonishing is why does the speeding satellite after it as made its nearest approach break away? How can that possibly happen? Why oesn't it crash into the planetary body since the gravitational influence eing felt would be at its greatest strength? Again, CoAM explains why that oesn't happen. I would conjecture that exactly how CoAM constantly comes to he rescue is not necessarily that well groked by most folks, including hysicists. I certainly didn't understand nor appreciate the incredible ance of physics that is involved, not until I started taking a long hard ook. It is my hope that how I finally learned to grok CoAM might help others who ay also
Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Puppy Dog d...@inbox.lv wrote: Axil is hidden and probably will never disclose background. Et vous? T
Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation
Jojo, Please note this correction - ...current density is directly related to radius^2... - should read ...current is directly related to radius^2... The extra word changes the meaning entirely. Too large a radius (~ electron mean free path), though, will make the current diffusive instead of ballistic. -- Lou Pagnucco Lou Pagnucco wrote: Jojo, I believe in both metal nanowires and carbon SWNTs, current density is directly related to radius^2 - Refer to equation(1), page 1 of - Stability of Metal Nanowires at Ultrahigh Current Densities http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0411058v3.pdf
Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation
What you are saying is the current carrying capacity of a conductor is proportional to the cross sectional area of the conductor. That is true only for the macro scale. Current flow in a 1 dimensional SWNT appears to be governed by quite different mechanisms. I do not believe the Current carrying capacity of a CNT is proportional to its cross sectional area. I believe SWNTs with smaller diameters can carry more current that MWNT with larger diameters. I believe that is exactly what long coherence lengths mean in this context. Tell me where I'm wrong. Jojo - Original Message - From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 11:59 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Coherent Quantum Wires and Charge Accumulation Jojo, Please note this correction - ...current density is directly related to radius^2... - should read ...current is directly related to radius^2... The extra word changes the meaning entirely. Too large a radius (~ electron mean free path), though, will make the current diffusive instead of ballistic. -- Lou Pagnucco Lou Pagnucco wrote: Jojo, I believe in both metal nanowires and carbon SWNTs, current density is directly related to radius^2 - Refer to equation(1), page 1 of - Stability of Metal Nanowires at Ultrahigh Current Densities http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0411058v3.pdf
Re: [Vo]:Is OPEC afraid of synfuels?
To cover the losses in waste production from small operations, it may be appropriate to extend the analysis to more types of waste streams. First, Chicken manure. Estimation of the total yearly United States bio-diesel production capability from chicken manure. Chicken manure weight = 0.21 lb/day The United States chicken population is (1,970,000,000) Average chicken waste (litter) production is 0.21 lb/day. The total yearly litter production is as follows: 1,970,000,000 * 0.21 lb/day * 365 days * 1/2000 = 75,500,250 tons At 150 gallons of bio-diesel per dry ton of chicken litter 75,500,250 tons * 150 gallons = 11,325,037,500 gallons of bio-diesel per year from chicken litter. Running total U.S yearly bio-diesel from United States manure production is as follows: 11,325,037,500 gallons from chickens + 189,000,000,000 gallons from cow manure = 200,325,037,500 total gallons of bio diesel per year. - Estimation of the total yearly United States bio-diesel production capability from human waste sludge. The United States population is (310,000,000) Annual mass sludge per capita 64.4 pounds The total yearly sludge production is as follows: 310,000,000 * 64.4 pounds/year * 1/2000 = 9,982,000 tons/year Assuming a 40% moisture content, the dry weight of sludge = 9,982,000 * .6 = 5,989,200 tons/year At 150 gallons of bio-diesel per dry ton of sludge - 5,989,200 tons/year * 150 gallons/dry ton = 898,380,000 gallons of bio-diesel per year from human waste sludge. Running total U.S yearly bio-diesel from United States manure/bio-waste production is as follows: 11,325,037,500 gallons from chicken litter + 189,000,000,000 gallons from cow manure + 898,380,000 gallons of bio-diesel per year from human waste sludge = 201,223,417,500 total potential gallons of bio diesel per year. = Estimation of the total yearly United States bio-diesel production capability from swine waste. The United States swine population is (60,388,700) Swine are estimated to produce daily raw manure of as much as 8.4 percent of body weight (urine and feces). Generally, growing-finishing pigs weighing 21 to 100 kg can be expected to generate 0.39 to 0.45 kg of waste per day on a dry matter basis (Brumm et al. 1980). .45kg (1 lbs) * 60,388,700 * 1/2000 *365 = 11020937 tons of swine waste/year 150 gallons of bio-diesel/ton * 11,020,937 tons of swine waste/year = 1,653,140,662 gallons of bio-diesel/year from swine waste Estimation of the total yearly United States bio-diesel production capability from municipal solid waste. The United States Environmental Protection Agency estimates that in 2006 there were 251 million tons of municipal solid waste, or 4.6 pounds generated per day per person in the USA 310,000,000 people * 4.6 lbs/person * 1/2000 * 365 days = 260,245,000 tons of municipal solid waste 150 gallons of bio-diesel/ton * 260,245,000 tons of municipal solid = 39,036,750,000 gallons of bio-diesel/year from municipal solid waste Running total U.S yearly bio-diesel from United States manure/bio-waste/solid waste production is as follows: 11,325,037,500 gallons from chicken litter + 189,000,000,000 gallons from cow manure + 898,380,000 gallons of bio-diesel per year from human waste sludge + 1,653,140,662 gallons of bio-diesel/year from swine waste + 39,036,750,000 gallons of bio-diesel/year from municipal solid waste = 241,913,308,162 gallons of bio-diesel/year(5,759,840,670 b/y --- 15,780,385 b/d) total potential gallons of bio diesel per year from U.S. waste streams. -- Because it is produced in massive concentrations, much of the bio-waste produces water pollution in streams and rivers or is burned for electric power production in meat processing plants or incinerated or landfilled. Also anaerobic digestion converts the waste to a methane and carbon dioxide rich biogas (sewage treatment) released to the atmosphere. All the minerals and nitrogen content from bio-diesel processing of the animal waste can be reapplied to farm land as mineral fertilizers formed from ash residue. Elimination of concentrated animal waste streams from the US biosphere will save about $500,000,000 to a high estimate of $ one trillion in medical costs and 3000 to 5000 deaths from food poisoning. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/business/16illness.html *In a pair of research reports made public on Wednesday, the **Centers for Disease Control and Prevention*http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/centers_for_disease_control_and_prevention/index.html?inline=nyt-org * said that about 48 million people a year get sick from tainted food, down from the previous, often-cited estimate of 76 million. The number of
