Genie in a Bottle: The Case Against Cold Fusion
By Jennifer Ouellette | October 29, 2012 |
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2012/10/29/genie-in-a-bottle-the-case-against-cold-fusion/
I shot a little video of my latest experiment with borax. It is controlled
with an Android phone, IOIO microcontroller, and relay bank. I am
switching back and forth between AC and DC current supplies. Pardon the
mess of wires as I am early in the process. It is interesting how the
electrolyte
Recent dark matter news for Stewie:
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/1024/Gigantic-invisible-cocoons-of-dark-matter-may-suck-up-rogue-stars
Dark matter orbits around and through regular matter creating.halos.
You are seeing massive dark matter in a chaotic multi-body orbit with
these stars. The halo is its path.
Unfortunately I just realized that some, not all halos on earth (rainbows)
are showing us the elliptical orbit of
Sigh . . . As they said of the French Bourbon dynasty, these people learn
nothing, and they forget nothing. This column could have been written
anytime in the last 23 years. There is not a single scientific fact in it.
There is not one reference to scientific literature. It is based on movies
and
I updated the LENR-CANR news item about cold fusion in the mass media. I
added:
Ouellette, J., *Genie in a Bottle: The Case Against Cold
Fusion*http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2012/10/29/genie-in-a-bottle-the-case-against-cold-fusion/,
in *Scientific American*. 2012.
Would you expect more from a recovering English major?
Hi Dave,
EQ prediction is possible with very low frequency geomagnetic monitoring.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg47319.html
Is it any surprise that when the earth fractures, or is under stress to the
point of fracture, it causes disturbances in its mag-field?
-Mark
All of the Astronomers Scientists and what-have-you are confused and/or
just flatout plain wrong about what is going-on out in deep space, in the
universe All you have to do is *Realize* that Highly Advanced Civilizations
Spacecraft have a bulblike dome of their underside that can Light
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2012/10/30/mark-prelas-neutron-mu/
Thanks for sharing the video Jack. I really like how your controlling
that with and Android and IOIO microcontroller.I'm a beginner Android
developer and the little IOIO PIC device is really cool.That is a great
way of doing a duty cycle on the AC/DC.
Here is a nice discussion on the
Thanks Chuck. It's a fun hobby.
I don't program in Java having done so much in visual basic over the years.
Fortunately, I found a language for Android that is very much like VB
called
Basic4Androidhttps://www.plimus.com/jsp/redirect.jsp?contractId=1715566referrer=1047706.
It has a library
I posted three messages in response to this article; one from Ed Storms and
two of my own. All three disappeared within about 20 minutes. I assume they
were erased. I just re-posted two of them. We will see if they vanish again.
Here are two of them:
Here is a response to this article written
I am glad to see this research revived, and glad they got it to work again.
A number of other people observed neutrons and other nuclear effects from
cryogenically cooled metals.
- Jed
Hi,
Seen the contents (or better said the lack of it) of this article and
the current comments shown, thy can not otherwise than to consider the
Scientific American as a strictly biased magazine, which lacks a decent
chief editor who should have performed a thorough review and hence this
When I open a browser incognito, I find no trace of my comments, which were
#11, 12 and 13. They are only visible to me when I am signed in as Jed
Rothwell. Apparently they are embargoed. That is to say, waiting for
approval.
Ah ha. A comment posted at 2:33 just appeared. It is critical of her
I am totally perplexed by how many reports of anomalous emission of
neutrons and/or high energy e-m radiation (with both Pd+D2 and Ni+H2)
can go unnoticed, or disproved by university physics labs.
The only possible explanations I can think of are
(1) intentional fraud
(2) pervasive, but honest
Okay, my comments are definitely gone, and the comment posted at 2:33 is
gone. That one quoted Robert Duncan.
She is erasing everything after her own comment at 1:16. At least, every
criticism. Maybe someone should post fawning praise to see if she keeps it.
If they want to close the discussion
Just for the record, would you post them here?
2012/10/30 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Okay, my comments are definitely gone, and the comment posted at 2:33 is
gone. That one quoted Robert Duncan.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Cheese.pdf
CONSTANTINE
MAGUIRE
(C
HICAGO),
CHARLES
ANDERSON
MC
LEOD
(T
ORONTO),
DOROTHY
MAHAJAN
F
ORMAGGIA,
(FAIRLEE,
VT).
Organic enhancer catalysts in Ni-H Lenr reactions: a successful
duplication of the Rossi-Focardi LENR device (Summer N-Physics Lab,
Lake
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for the record, would you post them here?
I did:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg72503.html
I posted one other short message that I did not record.
The message posted at 2:33 was from someone else. I did not get a chance to
It's a shame to waste those nice products as a catalyst for LENR.
_
From: Alan Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com]
Sent: mardi 30 octobre 2012 20:36
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Passi22 : The CHEESE paper
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Cheese.pdf
CONSTANTINE MAGUIRE (C
My last message is now gone.
You should not bother to write to this nitwit. I doubt there is any point
to writing to the editors, either.
Imagine casually erasing messages from Storms, without explanation or
apology!
- Jed
At 12:46 PM 10/30/2012, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:
Its a shame to waste those nice products as a catalyst for
LENR.
It seems that a significant proportion of the test materials were ...
diverted.
That is quite a story Mark. I am not sure why the magnetic field was modulated
prior to an EQ but I could readily expect that behavior during one. The
measurements your friend performed might have indicated that movement of the
earth was slowly occurring over a very large fault distance and I
on e-catnews there is a critic of report 41 that is too complex for me to
oppose without risk.
http://ecatnews.com/?p=2464cpage=3#comment-45607
here is the critic: can you comment...
Alain posted on October 29, 2012 at 6:30 pm:
if you don’t see there is something broken in mainstream
She put up an addendum from Krivit (and alluded to posting
difficulties) -- who is peddling discredited CF vs Real LENR ---
I wonder how a particular experiment knows how to behave depending on
the belief of the experimenter. (See the Pod and The Barrier)
At least I found out that Duncan is
-Original Message-
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com
I am totally perplexed by how many reports of anomalous emission of
neutrons and/or high energy e-m radiation (with both Pd+D2 and
Ni+H2)
can go unnoticed, or disproved by university physics labs.
Are there
With friends like that, who needs enemies?
2012/10/30 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
She put up an addendum from Krivit (and alluded to posting difficulties)
-- who is peddling discredited CF vs Real LENR ---
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Ouellette un-erased the comment by Storms, and added:
With all due respect to Dr. Storms, I stand by my post.
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2012/10/29/genie-in-a-bottle-the-case-against-cold-fusion/#comment-461
Perhaps she restored this in response to my last
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com
I am totally perplexed by how many reports of anomalous emission of
neutrons and/or high energy e-m radiation (with both Pd+D2 and
Ni+H2)
can go unnoticed, or disproved by
From Alan,
She put up an addendum from Krivit (and alluded to posting
difficulties) -- who is peddling discredited CF vs Real LENR
--- I wonder how a particular experiment knows how to behave
depending on the belief of the experimenter.
(See the Pod and The Barrier)
Sounds similar to the
the cause is even more interesting
http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/Groupthink%20IOM%207p%20paper.pdf
http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/Patterns%20of%20Denial%204l%20fin.pdf
2012/10/30 pagnu...@htdconnect.com
I am totally perplexed by how many reports of anomalous emission
It all goes to show that there is a lot we do not understand about
disturbed lattice reactions. Some emit neutrons, some emit gammas,
some emit alphas . . .
I would think that young physicists would want to seize the day and
venture into this Undiscovered Country where they stand to make a name
Ouellette explained:
FYI, there have been some technical problems with the commenting system,
but as I announced at the start of the post, I am also moderating the
comment thread heavily — because every time anyone criticizes cold
fusion/low-temp nuclear reactions, the same people descend upon
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I would think that young physicists would want to seize the day
and venture into this Undiscovered Country where they stand to make a
name for themselves.
They might want to, but if they talk about doing this they would soon be
tossed out the
The Scientific American has been, for at least 25 years, little more than
The Scientific Democrat. In other words, it is politics posing as
science. BTW: I was an adviser to Dukakis's platform committee in 88' and
I first used the term The Scientific Democrat around that time, the bias
was so
Ouellette continues to erase messages as fast as I can write them. She
erased my message linking to the comments made by Sci. Am. editors, as I
knew she would.
She will allow only skeptical attacks; no rebuttals or defense. Here is a
response I wrote to Cude, which I expect will be erased
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The Scientific American has been, for at least 25 years, little more than
The Scientific Democrat. In other words, it is politics posing as
science.
Let's not suggest that Democrats are more likely to politicize science than
Republicans. The Republicans
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
They might want to, but if they talk about doing this they would soon be
tossed out the university on some pretext.
The smart ones will learn to mask their research in the same way that
Mills masked his first patent
I had hoped to head off your erroneous suggestion by including my
Democratic affiliation at the time I first notice SciAm's political bias.
Your comment is true but suggests that I was directing my comment toward
Democrats rather than toward Scientific American's political bias toward
the
At 03:53 PM 10/30/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Wow! Mary Y relays your post
!!
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2012/10/29/genie-in-a-bottle-the-case-against-cold-fusion/#comment-473
Jed Rothwell writes on another forum that he thinks he's being
censored so I will
Hi,
Just a thought, what would happen if you would write about the same
facts but than everything in the opposite sense?
A kind of reverse psychology method.
Kind regards,
Rob
Ah, I now see Ouelette's article was prompted by the release of the film
The Believers.
Sorry, but when I see SciAm cited, I find myself unmotivated to read the
article.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:04 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I had hoped to head off your erroneous suggestion by
To which I responded:
Not that I can speak for Robert Park, but it is not that he is bragging
that he knows nothing, but rather that he knows who to listen to. Indeed,
this is virtually the entire history of the “cold fusion” fiasco including
the early 1990 rejection by the US editorial staff of
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Wow! Mary Y relays your post !! http://blogs.**scientificamerican.com/**
cocktail-party-physics/2012/**10/29/genie-in-a-bottle-the-**
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
To which I responded:
Not that I can speak for Robert Park, but it is not that he is bragging
that he knows nothing, but rather that he knows who to listen to.
Well said! Where did you write this? At the Sci. Am. site? I don't see it.
I guess she
This whole thing is comical.
Ouellette first censored a message from me pointing to a statement from *the
editor of her own magazine*. She will not allow a discussion of Sci. Am.'s
own editors' point of view! Then she turned around and allowed a skeptic to
post a copy of my message. (So far,
1) was filed in 2008.
2) most recent updates just a couple of weeks ago.
3) direct link to all the documentation:
https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application?number=EP08873805lng=entab=doclist
4) via:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/leonardo-patent-report-publication-scheduled-for-nov-21/
Lately Robert Park seems to be more interested in politix than fizzix:
http://bobpark.org/
My(another nemesis)! How the great (tree limbs) have fallen.
Andrea Rossi
October 30th, 2012 at 8:35
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=6#comment-381116
Dear Emilio Icaza:
Yes, Leonardo Corp is very much powerful now. I can already say that the
first 1 MW hot cat will go in operation within February 2013. It will not
be a military
Ah, Ouellette deleted Yugo's copy as well.
Good grief!
- Jed
For the record, Ouellette erased this one too:
Cude wrote: “I’m not aware of a single major university that has expressed
the opinion that evidence for the claims of PF is overwhelming.”
Professors at universities and at other institutions express that opinion.
For example, the Chairman of
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
To which I responded:
Not that I can speak for Robert Park, but it is not that he is bragging
that he knows nothing, but rather that he knows who to listen to.
Well said!
Dave wrote:
“If your friend has discovered a simple trick that works, he should be ready to
demonstrate it to these guys. Please do not tell me that EQ geologists behave
like physicists when the subject of LENR is brought up.”
The technique was actually developed by Elizabeth Rauscher and
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/28/soul-after-death-hameroff-penrose_n_2034711.html
How far fetched is this?
According to Dr. Hameroff, in a near-death experience, when the heart
stops beating, the blood stops flowing, and the microtubules lose their
quantum state, the quantum information
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:27 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
(3) the power of conformity, and fear of ostracism, completely prevents
university experimentation.
I am not an academic, so I can only discuss what I observe from the
outside. But I suspect the pressure on academics is
What a bunch of horse shit. I'm so sorry I went to follow up, and it's
like being a Dem shouted down at a Tea party rally.
Example quote: Alas, those are ideal conditions for crackpots to
flourish. I'm not much of a debater, but what do you say to that? If you
ever study logic, this statement
58 matches
Mail list logo
