It was well known that the surface atoms of metals e.g.
in catalysts are very mobile, and this has scientific and technological
importance- see e.g. my Surfdyn psper (Fusion Technology 24 AUG
1993, 122-6) re CF.
Peter
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Celani often mentioned 'sintering' a problem in his processed Constantan
wires during the conversations I had. This might be related.
So, what would be a good process to make suitable nano nickel (as you
called 'type 2')?
If Rossi actually knows something, he needs to document his process as
carefully as possible and directly help others to reproduce his work.
If his work can actually be reproduced, that would be groundbreaking,
magnificent.
If he doesn't help others to reproduce his work, and no one can
On 5/1/2013 6:27 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
Science recognizes that screening can accelerated alpha decay. How
does such screening affect the pions in their ability to keep these
nucleons inside the atom? In detail, what does screening do to the
pions? What changes?
I'm not sure what *you* mean
Had not seen that one. I still prefer the topical theory:
http://www.theoryofmatterandenergy.com/The%20Vortex%20Theory%20of%20Matter%20and%20Energy.pdf
as and edgy explanation of ME.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Not easy to explain, but seems to violate conservation of momentum
Why? You have the acceleration of gravity + the acceleration of the
magnetic field acting on the first ball.
Note that, on the return of the exiting
it seems we have to re-define some basic concepts
The author (who, if I remember well, has supported the idea of Cold Fusion,
writes here about our dear Scientific Method:
There is no Scientific Method:
http://bigthink.com/in-their-own-words/there-is-no-scientific-method
Peter
--
Dr. Peter
From: Terry Blanton
Not easy to explain, but seems to violate conservation of momentum
Why? You have the acceleration of gravity + the acceleration of the
magnetic field acting on the first ball.
Note that, on the return of the exiting ball, the first ball does not have
the energy to
Joseph S. Barrera III j...@barrera.org wrote:
If Rossi actually knows something, he needs to document his process as
carefully as possible and directly help others to reproduce his work.
That would be a patent. What you are describing is a patent. It protects
the owner's intellectual property.
On May 1, 2013, at 10:23 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
Hi Ed,
In fact, I suggested an explanation that met all of these
requirements, but this was either rejected or ignored. Consequently,
I have very little hope for any theory being accepted any time soon.
I have read your recent JCMNS
Come to think of it, this means that in principle IBM could store data at
one bit per atom starting now. Perhaps the biggest difficulty would be
finding the data again.
I guess this is the lower limit to data storage. I doubt that subatomic
storage will ever be possible.
Probably, archival
I believe another difficulty for this form of storage is that the temperature
must be kept extremely low to keep the placed atoms from jumping all over the
place. I also find it incredible that the metal surface appears to be so
smooth at this level of detail. Any idea what you would see if
Another overlooked version of the order-disorder route to anomalous
energy-gain is so-called flash steam. Here is a Joe-the-plumber definition
of the mixed-phase phenomenon which we know as flash steam. It can happen
in some home plumbing systems.
http://www.velansteamtraps.com/flash_steam.aspx
Actually it could be much better than one bit per atom.
It depends on how accurately the distance between atoms can be measured and
how closely they can be packed.
On a 2D surface there might be an analogy to linear RLL codes.
Current digital storage systems use Run length limited
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.net wrote:
Current digital storage systems use Run length limited (RLL) codes where
it's the distance between bits that contain the information.
** **
Theoretically you only need two samples to get lots of bits - if you can
measure the distance to
after reading Thomas Kuhn, Nassim Nicholas taleb, WadeBroad, Roland
Benabou, and after some experience in the backcourt of democracy and
Science, you know that it is a myth...
anyway, with hurts and delays it finally works... with some bloody
revolution regularly.
2013/5/2 Peter Gluck
Yes, eventually it works, but what works actually is the Science of tomorrow
not the Science with which we start
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
after reading Thomas Kuhn, Nassim Nicholas taleb, WadeBroad, Roland
Benabou, and after some experience in
I think what people are saying: The concept of science works but the
application frequently sucks! The Scientific method is a guide, like
the Ten Commandments, but is likewise frequently ignored.
Nevertheless, the idea works and provides an incentive for people who
need a guide.
Ed
I think that in case experiments cannot be done, reality (facts) cannot
be known, theory cannot be verified or modified, the virtuous cycle is
interrupted and the scientific method fails.
Let's focus on LENR
Peter
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I
I think that QuantumSphere can make a good nickel nanoparticle.
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/3.08/nano.html
I would try this particle to start off with
Get product info
https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/profile_excerpt/QuantumSphere
Then I would ask them to make a five
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I think what people are saying: The concept of science works but the
application frequently sucks!
Well, also that the method is not perfect. It works sometimes but not other
times. It is like any other technique, or any other institution.
Some
Something fun to fret about: the robot itself is a tiny little thing,
barely larger than a US cent.
http://images.sciencedaily.com/2013/05/130502142649.jpg
From the article:
the next steps will involve integrating the parallel work of many
different research teams who are working on the
Quote from article:
I want to create something the world has never seen before, adds Ma.
Actually, the world has seen this before. They are called insects.
We have a long way to go before we catch up with them.
However, congratulations are in order.
- Jed
A new definition of a Stinger Missile. :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, May 2, 2013 3:03 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Robotic insects make first controlled flight
Something fun to fret about: the robot itself is a
Axil,
Don't forget this is dangerous stuff for the amateur.
Google nickel nanoparticles danger
- You will find references like -
Nickel Nanoparticles Favor Development of Cancer
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Nickel-Nanoparticles-Favor-Development-of-Cancer-218239.shtml
Nickel Nanoparticles may
In an emergency situation can a strong magnet pull most of these from the room
air? If so, it might be wise to keep one handy when running experiments with
nickel powder.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: pagnucco pagnu...@htdconnect.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, May
I am not discussing using nano-particles. I am recommending MICRO-particles
with a nanowire coating. Yes, these can be dangerous if you breath them in.
But it is not easy to breath these big particles in. A dust mask will
protect from this danger.
5 microns is the grits size of 1000 grit sanding
Dave,
The literature indicates that the smaller the particle, the more dangerous
it may be due to larger surface area/volume ratio.
My guess is that these are the hardest to remove from circulating air.
- probably it's better to keep them in a confined chamber when preparing a
colloid. I am not
It might be easier to breed or to hybridize a new species of large hornet or
wasp, which are amenable to electronic control from a chip they are carrying
- which implants into their own nervous system. Some of them are over 5 cm
in length already. They are probably amenable to being steered by
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Not easy to explain, but seems to violate conservation of momentum
Why? You have the acceleration of gravity + the acceleration of the
magnetic
I agree more with the vision of Kuhn and Taleb, that it is not accident but
structural.
all blackswan, paradigm change, inconvenient anomalies, are treated the
same, for reason that are clear and unavoidable.
today what happened with LENR is described perfectly by Kuhn.
nothing else could have
Why build robots if you can just grow them?
There are some who might believe that extraterrestrials have already realized
such an advantage in the case of Grey Aliens !
I just wonder whether crystalization / re-crystalization of the nickel do
overrule the initial particle structures.
Since Rossi indicates that shuting down an e-cat takes a few hours,
probably due to overcooling, leaves the heated nickel in an amorfhous form.
It may even be that the nickel needs
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
**
Why build robots if you can just grow them?
There are some who might believe that extraterrestrials have already
realized such an advantage in the case of *Grey Aliens !*
Or human beings for that matter.
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
It might be easier to breed or to hybridize a new species of large hornet
or wasp, which are amenable to electronic control from a chip they are
carrying – which implants into their own nervous system.
They're onto you! See:
Computer controlled
Come to think about it, if I were interested in a far away world inhabited by a
species that shoots first I would send a soul less, robotic semi creature to
take the risks. The question that arises is why not send a robot that is
totally mechanical and that does not require special life
Indeed Jones, control of mammals has been long ago perfected :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7dRelyKzes
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
It might be easier to breed or to hybridize a new species of large
hornet or wasp, which are amenable to
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
I just wonder whether crystalization / re-crystalization of the nickel do
overrule the initial particle structures.
No. DGT says that there is a great increase in boron and beryllium near the
NAE. So material
Jones,
I don't think magnetic shock theory is required to explain the evident
gain in momentum.
The ball is likely travelling faster when it impacts the cradle with
the magnet then when hits the cradle without the magnet.
Although the ball is released from the same height in both cases, in
the
Nano nickel
Health/safety
First, I would like to reiterate what others have pointed
out about the health risks. I personally
suffered symptoms of pulmonary hypertension as a result to exposure. Initially
the doctors diagnosed it as PH and
said I had 3 to 5 year life expectancy. But
local
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I now propose it is a chain formed from 2p bonds that allow a series of
hydrons to form a chain of atoms. This kind of bond is normally not stable.
I propose it becomes stable in the crack for reasons I will not describe
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:47 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
My guess is that these are the hardest to remove from circulating air.
- probably it's better to keep them in a confined chamber when preparing a
colloid. I am not sure whether they penetrate skin.
I suspect that another problem
I wrote:
It's clear that you're looking for a way to conserve momentum, so that you
don't get 4He fragments and gamma rays -- i.e., hot fusion.
I didn't mean to imply that tritium and 3He and gammas are the result of
reactions in which momentum is not conserved -- only that you're looking
for
On May 2, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I now propose it is a chain formed from 2p bonds that allow a series
of hydrons to form a chain of atoms. This kind of bond is normally
not stable. I propose it
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Eric, before you make a conclusion you really need to understand what I'm
proposing, rather than using your own imagination. First of all, the
Hydroton is a neutral molecule consisting of an equal number of elections
This evening -- while thinking outside the confines of the standard model
-- I imagined proton is a neutron with a positron. Then I googled positron
inside neutron to see if the concept had be considered previously. I found
this letter to the editor of Nature from 1933 where it is proposed by N.
On 5/2/2013 10:16 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
This evening -- while thinking outside the confines of the standard
model -- I imagined proton is a neutron with a positron.
Well, first of all, you need a neutrino in there as well, otherwise the
spins won't add up.
But we do know better than we
How do theories explain lead, boron, iron and beryllium in LENR ash?
Explain this:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/35/SR35906insights.shtml
Isotopic Anomalies Reveal LENR Insights
How do theories explain the need for heat and/or electric discharge to
activate LENR?
Why do only even Z
48 matches
Mail list logo
