Can DrBob… or anyone else, divulge the identity of the MIT experimenter
responsible for the posted image of the water bath calorimeter which has been
running at COP – 1.5 ?
I had been hoping that this experiment might be tied to the work of Svetlana
Boriskina of MIT and/or associates –
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 12 Apr 2015 18:20:39 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The maddening realization for all of us could be that lithium would have
plated out on the cathode as well but this was never mentioned or
considered.
Perhaps to some extent, however there is a 3 eV difference
Ed Storms once told me that in Pd-D systems using an LiOD salt for the
electrolyte, the Li did not deposit at all on the Pd - implying that it
remained completely in the electrolyte. I am not sure in co-dep if any Li
would end up being trapped in the plated layers.
As I mentioned before,
I was just reviewing the very detailed graph by Brian Albiston on his site for
his LENR test on 4/12/2015 and see that it demonstrates proof of heat
generation from within the core. It may be a little early to determine that
LENR is the source of this power, but there is no doubt in my opinion
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:09:14 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
How it is implicated at a Pd cathode is a mystery.
It should occasionally be reduced to the atomic Li at the cathode, but is
unlikely to last long enough to plate out. It is a highly reactive metal, and
will readily
In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:21:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
At this point we need to have a long term experiment that exhibits the same
type of correlations before we can be certain that the process is nuclear
instead of some unknown chemical effect. You can be
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:50:39 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Bob Higgins's message:
How it is implicated at a Pd cathode is a mystery
It should occasionally be reduced to the atomic Li at the cathode, but
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Bob Higgins's message:
How it is implicated at a Pd cathode is a mystery
It should occasionally be reduced to the atomic Li at the cathode, but
is unlikely to last long enough to plate out. It is a highly reactive metal,
and
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Your understanding of the term hole is not correct. A hole is not a
place where electrons are missing. It is a place into which energy can be
dumped. And energy can be dumped when electrons are *present*, because
dumping the energy into the
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to David Roberson's message
At this point we need to have a long term experiment that exhibits the same
type of correlations before we can be certain that the process is nuclear
instead of some unknown chemical effect. You can be
Axial wrote
When the heat level that is driving the dipole vibration of electrons exceeds a
critical level, the amplitude of the magnetic field that is produced by the SPP
is strong enough and lasts long enough to hit the pile of nearby nuclei in one
shot where the magnetic field can
The prior post was too hasty.
Yes, there are good subwatt experiments from Mitchell Swartz and many others
showing higher COP than 1.5. But, there is an inverted “economy of scale” in
LENR and probably in most of QM as well. The higher the power, the lower the
gain.
In saying: there
Mills supporters will also claim that BLP gets greater than COP of 1.5.
My answer to that is that this paper is featured prominently on their site, and
must have their blessing. It comes from an independent observation.
he is a young Swedish CF/LENR enthusiast, writes well,
has visited me in Cluj. Very good in IT. See his blog. Has humor, a rare
quality.
Very helpful.
Peter
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*http://www.drboblog.com/iccf19-classy-sassy-padua/*
Next question –
Can DrBob… or anyone else, divulge the identity of the MIT experimenter
responsible for the posted image of the water bath calorimeter which has been
running at COP – 1.5 ?
SIDE NOTE: once again, we are seeing evidence that the expected COP in LENR is
in the range of 1.5
Dear Friends,
Have published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/04/news-and-first-scientific-session-at.html
more, and better organized news to come.
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
http://www.drboblog.com/iccf19-classy-sassy-padua/
17 matches
Mail list logo
