In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:21:50 -0400: Hi, [snip] >At this point we need to have a long term experiment that exhibits the same >type of correlations before we can be certain that the process is nuclear >instead of some unknown chemical effect. You can be confident that the >behavior is nuclear if indications of this type persist for a month. Perhaps >someone would like to calculate how long a chemical cause could exist that >leads to this same observation set to establish a lower limit upon the time >required to prove LENR beyond any doubt.
If you look at the Lugano experiment, and assume that all the energy came from H, then given the small amount that was present, each atom would have to have delivered near 9 MeV of energy. This is out of reach of any Hydrino reaction, so the process must have been nuclear, to a very large degree. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
