Will a sphere within a sphere (a ball-bearing in a transparent hollow sphere)
due to the gravitational attraction between them, center itself during free
fall?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_general_relativity
Or?
Blank
Excerps from Paul's post..
You are asking way too much from nature.
Nature?.. do you mean Physics? we actually know little about physics..
perhaps some assumed values is all.
My theory simply states energy is simply moved from
one location to another.
Location? do you mean
Fred wrote..
Will a sphere within a sphere (a ball-bearing in a transparent hollow sphere)
due to the gravitational attraction between them, center itself during free
fall ?
The inner ball should began to rotate until it begins to rub the inner wall.
Richard
Frederick Sparber wrote:
Will a sphere within a sphere (a ball-bearing in a transparent hollow
sphere)
due to the gravitational attraction between them, center itself during
free fall?
First, in Newtonian gravitation:
Inside a uniform spherical shell there's no gravitational field (no
Hi,
Michel Jullian wrote:
I did read your reply, I did think for a while, but
I still disagree ;-)
You insist on some _internal_ energy being spent
while the object falls. Where would it
come from when the object is an elementary particle
such as an electron, would it lose
mass or
RC Macaulay wrote:
Blank
Excerps from Paul's post..
You are asking way too much from nature.
Nature?.. do you mean Physics? we actually
know little about physics.. perhaps
some assumed values is all.
Some call it nature. Some call it the universe, etc.
The name universe
I didn't understand your reply, would the elementary particle (any particle,
e.g. a neutron, a quark) lose something while falling towards a planet?
BTW, I wonder if PE shouldn't be viewed as a property of the universe rather
than of an object.
BTW2, the universe is all that exists, by
That begs the question how much PE does the universe have?
Harry
Michel Jullian wrote:
I didn't understand your reply, would the elementary particle (any particle,
e.g. a neutron, a quark) lose something while falling towards a planet?
BTW, I wonder if PE shouldn't be viewed as a property
Michel Jullian wrote:
I didn't understand your reply, would the
elementary particle (any particle, e.g. a
neutron, a quark) lose something while falling towards
a planet?
Basically you're asking what sustains such particles.
To perhaps provide you with a
different POV, here's an analogy
From the link Frederick Sparber provided on LeSage's theory of gravity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation
In the context of mainstream science (albeit not as an explanation of
gravitation), the Lesage mechanism has been identified as a significant
factor in the
Consider the situation far from any planets or stars.
If the ball-bearing is initially at the centre of the shell it will remain
there. If it is initially off centre, the ball bearing and the shell will
move so as to minimize the distance between the point on the shell that was
initially
Harry Veeder wrote:
Paul,
I think what you are alluding to is more correctly
called power
rather than energy. Indeed, power can be
defined without the
concept of energy.
Hi Harry,
The discussion was regarding PE. So I was referring
to energy.
Harry Veeder wrote:
That begs the
Paul wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
Paul,
I think what you are alluding to is more correctly
called power
rather than energy. Indeed, power can be
defined without the
concept of energy.
Hi Harry,
The discussion was regarding PE. So I was referring
to energy.
I know. Let be
[This message bounced for some reason. It said Vortex-L does not exist.]
Here is a fascinating concept! This resembles a space elevator, but the author
believes it could be built with conventional materials,
rather than superstrong materials that have not yet been invented. It seems
like it
-Forwarded Message-from Akira Kawasaki
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 26, 2007 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday January 26, 2007
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Jan 07 Washington, DC
1. STATE OF THE UNION: ALL WE ARE
Harry Veeder wrote:
Paul wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
Paul,
I think what you are alluding to is more
correctly
called power
rather than energy. Indeed, power can be
defined without the
concept of energy.
Hi Harry,
The discussion was regarding PE. So I was
referring
That sounds really ingenious :-) ! Thanks for posting it.
I was thinking of a much smaller application to aircraft, i.e. a lot of weight
of an airplane is in the wing spar.
Suppose a ring of mercury or any liquid is circulating around the wings at high
speed holding tension on the wings.
They
I wrote:
moving along at 50,000 kph. (I think it is a steel band, but perhaps it is
made up discrete pieces of iron?)
It has to be a steel band.
- Jed
http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=342064rel_no=1
Rethinking Alternative Energy
Some potentially powerful sources not getting attention
Sebastian Baciu (SebastianB)
Alternative energy sources have been gaining increasing attention as of
late, both in the media and
19 matches
Mail list logo
