On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote
Bottom line: it is looking like the new normal for chemistry is what was
formerly 1COP2 and is not nuclear and not chemical - thus it can be called
suprachemical.
...or infranuclear. ;-)
harry
Sequential placement of 2.6, 2.7 H secondaries on 666 pancake primary system.
Middle segment of each phasing stack has a reversed polarity to yield a one
sixth cycle polarity interaction. A 3 phase car alternator is used to power the
process; without the field being energized to obtain the
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Answer: gain, but LOW gain - and remarkably consistent long -term low-gain.
In other words, the new normal.
I am sorry but there is not the SLIGHTEST experimental evidence for this. I
may not understand advanced physics but one thing I do have is
It would be fun to ask him. Perhaps he doesn't believe in CF/LENR. More
likely he has his own list of priorities and doesn't care.
The fusion reactor he constructed himself was/is a Fusor. There's lots of
information on Fusors on the web.
Jeff
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Drowning Trout
All is not lost. See:
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/vote-for-darwin-write-in-campaign-for-the-dead-scientist-garners-him-4-000-votes/265030/
http://www.saphonenergy.com/
Their video says they are more efficient than coventional than current
wind turbines but I don't see how they work.
French:LENR Cities initiative to help LENR development (in France...)
On French equivalent of Linked In (viadeo) Michel Vanderberghe announce an
initiative LENR cities to help develop LENR in the society... It is
targeted to France.
Michel is currently looking for French labs interested in
Hi,
As far what I understand from it, it does work with a kind of piston in
the middle of the dish in the same kind of way how a cylinder in an
engine moves back and forth by air pressure.
Kind regards,
Rob
On 10-11-2012 18:07, Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.saphonenergy.com/
Their
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Hi,
As far what I understand from it, it does work with a kind of piston in the
middle of the dish in the same kind of way how a cylinder in an engine moves
back and forth by air pressure.
So it reciprocates? Sounds
From: Jed Rothwell
Answer: gain, but LOW gain - and remarkably consistent long -term low-gain.
In other words, the new normal.
I am sorry but there is not the SLIGHTEST experimental evidence for this.
Get some caffeine, or someone will think you have lost the encyclopedia.
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Hi,
As far what I understand from it, it does work with a kind of piston in the
middle of the dish in the same kind of way how a cylinder in an
Here's the patent app; but, it's in French:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBeHhrV3YzVFZBNWM/edit
Hi,
On 10-11-2012 18:19, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Hi,
As far what I understand from it, it does work with a kind of piston in the
middle of the dish in the same kind of way how a cylinder in an engine moves
back and forth
One of the common pseudoskeptical arguments is that cold fusion
believers believe that cold fusion was suppressed. The picture
conveyed is that of wild-eyed conspiracy theorists.
However, with *very little conspiracy,* cold fusion *was* suppressed,
and the story is out in the open, in the
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
I wonder if a similar construction with a coil moving around a permanent
magnet could work also, such like a loudspeaker but i.s.o. applying energy
extracting energy it from it and be still energy efficient.
That's
An interesting concept. Do you think that they impact the incoming wind with
their mechanical design so that it oscillates in and out to drive the piston?
A flag appears to generate wave motion from smooth steady wind by some form of
positive feedback, perhaps this is somewhat similar.
Dave
Not the breakfast of champions; but, a bettery (better battery) which
triples the capacity of today's:
http://news.rice.edu/2012/11/01/rice-team-boosts-silicon-based-batteries-2/
The team led by Rice engineer Sibani Lisa Biswal and research
scientist Madhuri Thakur reported in Nature’s open
Good comment, possibly from pitch-polers or other wind-bag oracles:
oh good lord... a turbine that puts huge wind force stresses and resonant
stresses on a tower...
kinda like what I saw out on the Bay the other day - Larry'$ multi-million fail:
This is a suggestion and a request for feedback regarding testing and
development of the Papp engine.
It seems to me that a potential cost effective way to get the Papp piston
instrumented to record how it reacts to experimental detonations of various
gas mixtures is to use a Single-Axis, High-g,
Just a note re: bladeless turbines
A couple years ago I helped a local inventor test his prototype new
bladeless turbine. It was a simple little, hand made, 6 inch deal that we
got spinning over 15000 rpm with a little steam boiler. He has a patent on
it #7824149, and is building now a larger,
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
One of the common pseudoskeptical arguments is that cold fusion believers
believe that cold fusion was suppressed. The picture conveyed is that of
wild-eyed conspiracy theorists.
However, with *very little conspiracy,* cold fusion *was*
Guys,
Just a quick update on my research. I am not a Nuclear Engineer so I fall
short there but please accept me for who I am.
1) My research tells me LENR is basically atomic Hydrogen collapsing to a
Neutrino, which can then bombard its surroundings, including other
hydrogen, triggering +/-
At 02:37 AM 11/10/2012, Drowning Trout wrote:
Where is he? and why isn't he contributing to the Vortex collective?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Jeff Berkowitz
mailto:pdx...@gmail.compdx...@gmail.com wrote:
At 11:20 AM 11/9/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I have a friend, very smart guy, who I've been working on over time
with occasional CF/LENR tidbits and arguments. Lately he wrote this,
and gave me permission to send it along.
Perhaps this response will help your friend.
So, let's identify all
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Get some caffeine, or someone will think you have lost the encyclopedia…
cough, cough… after all, this is only the longest running (by far)
validated experiment in the entire field. Fully replicated by NASA at two
locations with same results. COP about
The recent posting on Lenr Forum -
http://www.lenrforum.eu/viewtopic.php?f=58t=837
- refers to the latest (Nov.1) Piantelli WIPO Patent WO/2012/147045A1. See:
Title: (WO2012147045) METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING ENERGY BY
NUCLEAR REACTIONS OF HYDROGEN ADSORBED BY ORBITAL CAPTURE ON A
As far as I know - there are no, zero, nada, high-gain Ni-H experiments in
the multi-watt power range, lasting for months other than anecdote - at
least none with independent validation.
Matter of fact, I can think of no published and replicated high-gain
multi-watt Ni-H experiment lasting
Guys,
Just a short update on my research:
Guys,
I am not a Nuclear Engineer so I fall short there but please accept me for
who I am.
1) My research tells me LENR is basically atomic Hydrogen collapsing to a
Neutrino, which can then bombard its surroundings, including other
hydrogen,
I am fluent in French. Is this worthwhile looking at?
Cheers,
Lawry
On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Here's the patent app; but, it's in French:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBeHhrV3YzVFZBNWM/edit
The idea is good, it was already used in Italy, I have participated at 2
symposiums organized by the town Grottammare, many participants from the
industry (Chambre de Commerce) and the press was also present.
Invited speakers Hal Fox (R.i.P.) and I
Peter
2012/11/10 Alain Sepeda
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
(The claims of public demonstrations by Rossi are *all* marred, so far,
by possible error or fraud modes that were overlooked at the time, and
Rossi has consistently refused support by people like Jed Rothwell, who
There's an excellent and large collection of physics essay entries
over at the 2012 FQXi essay contest. (Rats! Entries are closed, finalists
already selected!)
Contest, which of our basic physical assumptions are wrong?
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1263
the essays
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:11 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Also, the document claims that high energy protons are emitted
(6.7 MeV from Ni, page 4). I believe Piantelli has recorded high energy
protons from previous experiments, even hours after the experiment
finished. Has this been
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
looks that way...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2IeCJiddQg
That was hilarious. I enjoyed that a lot. I cannot believe that's real.
Eric
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/114-hydrogen-loading-commenced
The paper is quite long. Perhaps I am misunderstanding some of it, but I
think the claim is that proton capture occurs as the major energy source.
Hasn't Takahashi shown it's pretty unlikely?
Also, I could be recalling incorrectly, but haven't Rossi/Focardi changed
their opinion on this?
And,
I love the way these people are making this stuff public. Almost in real
time!
- Jed
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:47 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
The paper is quite long. Perhaps I am misunderstanding some of it, but I
think the claim is that proton capture occurs as the major energy source.
Hasn't Takahashi shown it's pretty unlikely?
If you or anyone else knows of a
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:00 PM, de Bivort Lawrence ldebiv...@gmail.com wrote:
I am fluent in French. Is this worthwhile looking at?
Mais non.
The video was sufficient.
I can not wait to get some accurate data to analyze! These guys are doing
fantastic work and I greatly appreciate it.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Nov 10, 2012 5:06 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:MFMP : Hydrogen
Real time fully documented on YouTube LERN based open source
experimentation has many advantages.
The downsides of this noble behavior are the loss of intellectual
property, large piles of money, and the Nobel Prize.
Cheers: Axil
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jed Rothwell
Eric,
I cannot identify the correct theory, but in case you haven't seen a
couple of Takahashi's publications, see -
Are Ni+H Nuclear-Reactions Possible
www.iscmns.org/work10/TakahashiAarenihnucl.ppt
and the related -
Physics of Cold Fusion by TSC Theory
http://vixra.org/pdf/1209.0091v1.pdf
Geeze, cavitation and Papp association. I really must welcome all the
folks who have joined us in the past couple of years!
A thought just occurred to me. If the ionic crystals are riding upon a force
generated by the Casimir effect, does this represent some form of reactionless
force? What is pushed in the opposite direction to compensate for the momentum
of the LeClair crystals? It appears that they exhibit
The crystal, moving at supersonic and greater speeds, is surrounding by a
bow shock like a fighter plane. This supersonic speed is determined by the
speed of sound of the material that carries the shockwave. The positively
charged crystal is attracted to its own negatively charged bow shock by the
The process appears very interesting but I still do not understand what
material is forced to move in opposition to the high energy forward
accelerating crystal. If the electrons are the source of the energy, then they
would slow down quickly as the energy is fed to the ions I would suspect.
The following paper has a video at it bottom that shows what a vortex
shaped plasmoid looks like when it hits the substrate (piston)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0910.3175
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The crystal, moving at supersonic and greater speeds, is
The bow shock does not respond with an equal and opposite force because of
a proposed conflict between Newton’s classical First Law of Motion with the
quantum theory based Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal.
The Heisenberg Principal states that highly fixed objects must exhibit a
proportionally
48 matches
Mail list logo
