We were using an Agilent N5230A for all our testing:
http://www.home.agilent.com/en/pd-415192/4-port-pna-l-series
Key Features Specifications
- Integrated 4-port, balanced measurements
- 103 dB dynamic range and 0.004 dB trace noise
- 4.5 usec/point measurement speed, 32 channels,
On 2012-12-11 05:02, David Roberson wrote:
I am seeking a bit of feedback from the Vortex crowd.
For more feedback, next time try writing a new thread (by writing a new
post to the mailing list at vortex-l@eskimo.com with the write
function or its equivalent in your email client) instead of
Abd
ul-Rahman Lomax
Mon,
10 Dec 2012 19:42:40 -0800
At 08:36 AM 12/10/2012, chan.fusion.po...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI:
http://papp.scienceontheweb.net/Forming.html
www.free-energy-info.co.uk/P2.pdf
BTW Trying to pass off LENR as
Thanks for the advice Akira. I have typically been using a response to another
vortex email as a template. I changed the subject and was unaware that this
would not work. It seems strange that this occurs, but now I understand.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa
I gather “chan.fusion” is accusing Mr. Rothwell of using the lenr-canr
website specifically for the purposes of a tax dodge.
Oh, give me a tax break! I think not.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I gather “chan.fusion” is accusing Mr. Rothwell of using the lenr-canr
website specifically for the purposes of a tax dodge.
I missed that. This would be the world's worst tax dodge, since it costs me
a lot more than I can reduce in
One can read these optimistic noises with only a day to go as implying
that they are delaying any public demonstration of their engine until
January's CES show in Vegas. It all hinges on the meaning of the phrase
the show as binding to the temporal context of the PowerGen show -- or
binding to
From James:
One can read these optimistic noises with only a day to go as implying
that they are delaying any public demonstration of their engine until
January's CES show in Vegas. It all hinges on the meaning of the phrase
the show as binding to the temporal context of the PowerGen show --
Erratum: That was the Opening Keynote Session. It is now over. The PGI
Plenary Session will be Thursday at 9am. The exhibit floor just opened
but there is no live stream from there AFAIK.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, if one reads the entire tome JR posted at
http://inteligentry.com/report.html there are a couple of contingencies
that must be met before demonstrations either live or via video:
1) There is the matter of pending patents which sets some sort of
contingency that may block demonstration.
At 09:44 AM 12/11/2012, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
I gather âchan.fusionâ is accusing Mr. Rothwell of using the lenr-canr
website specifically for the purposes of a tax dodge.
Oh, give me a tax break! I think not.
Yeah. I would assume that Jed is using another
approach. That is
Vorts,
Flocking seems to be a bottom up emergent property of lots of natural
systems that can be modeled using complexity theory. It's been awhile
since I read it but I belive it's covered in: At home in the Universe by
Stuart Kauffman. A really interesting book by the way.
A quick search
Just to be clear on something I recently opined. It’s one thing to
express a personal opinion of extreme doubt and suspicion, as I have
recently done. It’s quite another thing to assume one’s personal
opinion is the correct one that other’s should emulate.
If there is the slightest chance that
At 10:54 AM 12/11/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
mailto:svj.orionwo...@gmail.comsvj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I gather chan.fusion is accusing Mr. Rothwell of using the lenr-canr
website specifically for the purposes of a tax dodge.
I missed that. This would be the
Enjoy the ten artists who responded to the call for new energy inspired
work.
Your feedback will help determine the show prizes given on Dec 22.
http://coldfusionnow.org/gallery/shift-2012-gallery/
Enjoy!
--
Ruby Carat
r...@coldfusionnow.org mailto:r...@coldfusionnow.org
United States
Inteligentry announced this Popper kit, earlier this year, with a
huge fanfare, to allow people to test the technology. Great idea, really.
What happened? http://www.plasmerg.com/kits.html
Currently, the page says that the original kit is not available. Not
to worry, it is being replaced with
Mills:
We will announce some substantial developments at some point.
Craig
Original Message
Subject:Re: [SocietyforClassicalPhysics] End of Year
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:07:46 -0500
From: Randell Mills rmi...@blacklightpower.com
Reply-To:
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Mills:
We will announce some substantial developments at some point.
How informative!
Things would be so different, if they were not as they are.
- Jed
Hi Ruby,
Thank You for this.
The range of contributions, depending on one's point of view, goes from the
sublime to the almost ridiculous - but one work clearly stands out for me
(but an art critic I am not). It stands out the sense of actively adding
surprising insight through art.
Hi, I hijack a little that thread to ask you all, what are your various
opinion on their claimed technology of LENR to electricity direct
conversion (CIHT).
I don't see any other paper or lab results that are similar.
Anomalous heat, transmutation, and radiations are quite validated , but
device
In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:03:10 +0100:
Hi,
IMO, Mills is not LENR. It is what he says it is. Hydrinos. However I suspect
that most of LENR is mediated by Hydrinos too ;)
Hi, I hijack a little that thread to ask you all, what are your various
opinion on their
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Yeah. I would assume that Jed is using another approach. That is a
charitable activity. It is definitely *not* a profit-making business.
Actually, LENR-CANR.org has no legal existence at all. It is informal.
However, I get some money from the
Answer at bottom:James Bowery Wrote on Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:07:00 -0800On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Cy Cle c...@inbox.lv wrote: No working Papp engine will be displayed or videos shown. It has not been replicated as yet. Rohner brothers do not understood the mechanisms of Papp's engine.
This guy checked:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHn5gTtLGkc
the technology cited at:
http://www.oocities.org/waterfuel111/water_explosion_menu.html
which was cited by:
http://papp.scienceontheweb.net/Forming.html
item 12
He apparently didn't want to release his technology because it would
At 12:42 PM 12/11/2012, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Just to be clear on something I recently opined. Itâs one thing to
express a personal opinion of extreme doubt and suspicion, as I have
recently done. Itâs quite another thing to assume oneâs personal
opinion is the correct one
From Abd:
...
What we have is Sterling Allen, who cut John Rohner a lot of slack.
And who is now about as negative as I can imagine him getting.
http://pesn.com/2012/12/10/9602241_Inteligentry_Egg-on-Face_PowerGen/
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
They could say so. But what they actually do is to claim that they have
something already. They actually did have Popper kits. The question is
whether or not they worked, that is, sure, they might pop. the piston
FYI:
See: http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=659page=56
Copy below:
Today, 12:26 AM
Post: #1120
Chan Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 20
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 0
Warning Level: 0%
RE: Let's build A Popper Noble Gas Engine AKA Ppap Engine.
Russ,
Papp dissociates
28 matches
Mail list logo
