On 11/14/2013 11:44 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Since we knew the original distance to the star was 10 light years, it
suggests that we should reach it within 1 year our time at our
calculated velocity. Is this what should actually occur?
By which model? A ship can't travel faster than light
On 11/15/2013 01:44 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Steven,
The hypothetical ship is undergoing an acceleration of 10 G's. This
is determined by an accelerometer on board that is quite accurate. If
this level of acceleration is applied for the 1 year period, then I
can calculate that my
I apologize for correcting you. I didn't read your whole post. I think
you have it right.
Craig
On 11/15/2013 05:23 AM, Craig wrote:
On 11/15/2013 01:44 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Steven,
The hypothetical ship is undergoing an acceleration of 10 G's.
This is determined by an accelerometer
From time to time, evidence pops up regarding the easier way to solve the
Global Energy Crisis and peak oil. Easier ... being in reference to LENR
and the possibility that LENR may not be robust enough over an extended time
frame to save us from catastrophe.
That easier route would be through
I think we will find the Earth is connected to the Sun by wires or
strings of quantum vacuum energy in the solar wind and that our atmosphere
is a capacitor discharging that energy to the Earth's core, which is a
battery, during storms and such. All of this is part of our decaying
quantum gravity
http://news.sciencemag.org/2001/06/magnetism-stiffens-space-time
Magnetism Stiffens Space-Time
Strong magnetic fields can break down the vacuum, to result in the creation
of p mesons.
http://homepages.uni-regensburg.de/~eng14891/qcdB_workshop/pdf/QCDB_Callebaut.pdf
Holographic study of
In M Theory, stings have tension, or stiffness, which agrees with the
above. Lots of energy curled up in those strings. Closed strings are
gravitational and pull at space. I think they are decaying above our heads
in a phenomenon we call the weather.
After plotting 10 months of sinkholes,
http://nextbigfuture.com/2013/11/john-slough-personally-explains-his.html
Craig,
The ship is stationary and accelerating from its perspective and current
velocity. Only outside observers believe that it is gaining mass. Another
observer might conclude that the mass of the exhaust radiation is greater in
the same proportion as the overall mass is increasing which
Craig,
Honest, open discussions require no apologies. There is plenty of room for
alternate ideas which should be welcome to all. Please continue to ask
questions and suggest holes within any argument since that is the way to new
understanding.
The ideas being explored in this exercise
In reply to pagnu...@htdconnect.com's message of Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:43:00
-0500 (EST):
Hi,
Please suggest such an effect.
[snip]
While the information you suggest acquiring is valuable, I think the
important issue is not bulk energy absorption, but how hot hot spots
can get - that is, how
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:13:23 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
In a polariton based hot spot, the electrons are part of a dipole where the
hole makes the electron a boson. Therefore *unlimited numbers *of electrons
can populate a hot spot.
You are confusing population of energy
I appreciate the thorough response and would like to seek clarification of a
couple of issues discussed.
jwinter says:
That is correct. However for us to measure how fast our signal leaves our
ship, we need 2 clocks - Say one at the back of the ship where the signal is
launched from and one
I was thinking about this subject again, and looking up some numbers. I
often look at automobiles because they are the most common machines on
earth. The internal combustion engine is the cheapest primary power source
measure in dollars per kilowatt of capacity. There is more capacity in
Robin,
I can quickly suggest a couple of examples where e-m field momentum is
concentrated - in a very counter-intuitive way.
First, look at the references in the recent Vortex thread -
[Vo]:Momentum superkicks from monochromatic e-m fields
http://phys.org/news/2013-11-nasa-led-firefly-mission-lightning-video.html
NASA-led firefly mission to study lightning
Lightning may be linked to incredibly powerful and energetic bursts called
terrestrial gamma ray flashes, or TGFs—remains a mystery.
The radiation generated by lightning is so
Arrangements are being made for other educational institutions to examine this
device on their own, in one month segments of operational ownership.. It
becomes difficult for me to bear the costs involved with transportation, set up
ect...
I agree. We have ignored for the history of man that the 95% vacuum energy
is right here in our atmosphere. I believe it is our decaying quantum
gravity field from the Sun. Earth was not just created billions of years
ago, it is in a continual process of creation and decay through LENR.
It
On 16/11/2013 6:04 AM, David Roberson wrote:
jwinter says:
/*That is correct. However for us to measure how fast our signal
leaves our ship, we need 2 clocks - Say one at the back of the ship
where the signal is launched from and one at the front of our ship to
time how long it takes to
* However if we consider ourselves using our initial clock synchronisation,
then we know our true accumulated speed because we can see that the light
pulse is only just travelling a bit faster than us (it takes the pulse a
very long time to travel from the back of the ship to the front) and so we
On 16/11/2013 12:25 PM, leaking pen wrote:
/*However if we consider ourselves using our initial clock
synchronisation, then we know our true accumulated speed because we
can see that the light pulse is only just travelling a bit faster than
us (it takes the pulse a very long time to travel
On 16/11/2013 12:25 PM, leaking pen wrote:
/*However if we consider ourselves using our initial clock
synchronisation, then we know our true accumulated speed because we
can see that the light pulse is only just travelling a bit faster than
us (it takes the pulse a very long time to travel
22 matches
Mail list logo
