If the spaceman can detect the microwave photons exiting the cavity with lots
of momentum the drive would not be considered reactionless. A true
reactionless drive does not exhaust any significant form of matter or energy
that can be detected by the guy when it operates. Of course heat can
Another idea based on the same concept, some forms of energy do not seem to
contribute to rest mass, I doubt a compressed spring would have a different
rest mass due to it's energy storage than the same spring uncompressed.
Actually the spring is supposed to have a greater amount of rest mass
Ok, so a charged battery is more massive than a discharged battery...
A bowling ball on a shelf is more massive than the same bowling ball on the
ground (greater potential energy).
A spring compressed or stretched is more massive than one under no tension.
I was wondering as I typed the
Just to clarify that further, if the mass of something depended on it's
energy, and if that includes potential energy then anything that provides
potential energy to other objects increases the potential of every object
that could fall into this potential field at any at any point.
And since some
Bob, well said, I would only add that this is also not a matter of ejecting
mass but energy consumed to directionalize an existing media like an airplane
or boat prop re-directionalize air or water - it is giving the spacecraft
linkage to the ether against which it can simply push. Although
David--
If Dirac was correct about his negative energy sea containing epos with its
below energy electron-positron pairs (epos), then there might be negative
energy momentum--my term--as well, which is where the momentum of virtual
particles in the spaceman's 3-D space disappear to upon
David--
You stated:
After the drive is shut down the ship stops accelerating and comes to rest
in space. Even though the new velocity is different than the old one before the
drive operates, a guy onboard the ship can not determine that he is moving.
Yes he can determine he is moving. All
There is ambiguity here based upon a 3D vs 4D perspective but maybe some of
these patents regarding remediation of radioactive gas in a catalyst could shed
some light. I would posit that this reaction is actually based upon
relativistic effects on radioactive gas when local vacuum wavelengths
Bob, consider the following sequence of maneuvers taken by the spaceship and
the guy within. First, he decided to move in one direction for an extended
length of time. Then he decides to return to his starting point by reversing
the drive. After all of his mechanizations the final result is
Yes, he can determine that he has changed velocity by looking outside the ship
at other objects. That is why I proposed the recent posting where he returns
to the original location and velocity. That procedure counters the thought
that a final velocity change can obscure any problems due to
David--
The guy need only account for the loss of mass energy by adding the amount of
energy transferred to the negative energy sea.
Of course, if he does not consider a negative energy sea exists, he cannot
properly account. He is stuck with an observation that makes no sense to him.
His
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/11/24/prometeon-srl-addresses-e-cat-licensee-status/
Someone has taken customers away from Rossi and IH, who could it be? This
alterative to Rossi must be well known on the LENR street. Jed, with your
ear so close to the ground, you must know who this Rossi
OK John, I can see the need for salt. Lots of it.
Otherwise I think we are saying the same thing.
The motivation to act must come from an inside resource. Getting good
grades and an easy entrance to a good job is motivation with incentives
(from outside resources).
However, if a person has a
A very condemning statement from Promethion (E-Cat licensee) --- they had 1MW
orders, but Rossi wouldn't complete them.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/11/24/prometeon-srl-addresses-e-cat-licensee-status/
When the ship was moving in one direction only we calculate that all of the
missing mass ends up as kinetic energy of the ship. But now that two
directions are used and we end up at the original starting point and velocity
we decide that all of that energy is imparted to the negative energy
That is a good point.
If a few of the right people with very high trust capital were to pronounce
that cold fusion, or some model of the aether (by any name) was correct,
there would be a large number sit up and take notice.
But it must be trust and not popularity, Tom Cruise isn't making fans
Promising that to the public in general is one thing. Signing contracts
with partners is another.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rossi not a serious businessman, promising more than what he can deliver?
Cherokee not tender with others companies,
Not sure it is a group with a working or promising reactor...
2014-11-24 18:29 GMT+01:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/11/24/prometeon-srl-addresses-e-cat-licensee-status/
Someone has taken customers away from Rossi and IH, who could it be? This
alterative to
Rossi not a serious businessman, promising more than what he can deliver?
Cherokee not tender with others companies, trying to close competitors?
is it so surprising?
2014-11-24 18:44 GMT+01:00 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com:
A very condemning statement from Promethion (E-Cat licensee) --- they
Probability now at 35% based on allegations of what I consider to be fraud
from a partner.
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/11/24/probability-now-35-based-on-allegations-of-fraud/
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze exhibits his
luca gamberale?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not sure it is a group with a working or promising reactor...
2014-11-24 18:29 GMT+01:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
David, I take it you now accept that energy can be stored without
increasing mass?
I can see you have avoided tackling the subject so I assume this is an
admission that you can't.
This then means we can produce a reactionless drive by changing between
forms of energy that do and do not
I made some revisions to my Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJreportonmi.pdf
On page 15 I added a photograph of the equipment with the aluminum foil
tent over it. On page 24 I added a discussion of heat from the circulation
pump. The key point is:
no,
if you search you see many LENr startup without much concrete but sometime
with good network, good team, and thus potential to build a technology.
2014-11-24 20:20 GMT+01:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
luca gamberale?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
John, I suspect that you are reading my lack of answer the wrong way. I have
been quite busy writing a post about how to test an ECAT like device during a
lot of that time.
Pushing a mass against gravity is a way to store potential energy. Without
going into details I suspect that energy
Putting two and two together, the competition has uncovered the Rossi
secret and is a dangerous competitor for the E-Cat.
you said that “We cannot feed more information to our competition, which
now is very powerful”. My question is: how can any competitor be powerful
without knowing the core
Greetings Vortex-L,
Not sure how valid the Volfson patent is but the Taylor Patent is
cited within the Volfson.
http://www.google.com/patents/US6960975
I called the patent attorney for Taylor...his comment...which I
think is correct: Taylor was found dead in the desert!
Taylor patent was issued
An answer from Mats Lewin
@Axil
I really don’t know if there’s any particular competitor.
My experience is that those kind of statements from Rossi are often not
based on any exact details. Could as well be to mislead.
However, if Rossi’s E-Cat works, there should be several groups trying to
I have been conducting numerous simulations of the expected behavior of a
thermally controlled energy source such as the HotCat designed by Rossi. Now I
have constructed a technique that can be utilized to characterize a design and
determine many of its important parameters.
It would be
David--
In your going and coming trip:
The spaceman uses energy by speeding up and slowing down in each
direction--going out and coming back. He notices a loss of mass to somewhere,
but not account for by any particles or mass he can measure that has left the
space craft in going and coming
http://www.nichenergy.com/
I'd put my money on Piantelli.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.nichenergy.com/
Re nichenergy.com
Registered to Alessandro Meiarini
Of http://patents.justia.com/inventor/alessandro-meiarini
Regards,
patrick
I suppose that if one can assume that mass can just vanish into somewhere
without leaving a trace that it may be possible for a drive of this sort to
operate. It is easy for the guy on the ship to detect that he is accelerating
which takes a force and therefore energy from somewhere. That
I am decreasign my ASSessment of an ASSurance that Blaze will pull his
head out of his ASinine hind quarters from 6.59% down to 6.4%. SSDD from
Blaze.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Probability now at 35% based on allegations of what I
From Jones,
Nice effort. Hope springs eternal.
Thanx,
I've had a couple of Vort editors privately point out some grammatical
mistakes in my document. (I expected there would be a few.) The most blatant
error and by far the most embarrassing that has been pointed out so far is
the fact that I
*Inventors: *Alessandro MEIARINI, Silvia PIANTELLI, Leonardo CIAMPOLI,
Fabio CHELLINI
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Re nichenergy.com
Registered to Alessandro Meiarini
Of http://patents.justia.com/inventor/alessandro-meiarini
Regards,
http://www.rexresearch.com/piantelli/piantelli.htm
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
*Inventors: *Alessandro MEIARINI, Silvia PIANTELLI, Leonardo CIAMPOLI,
Fabio CHELLINI
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Corrections made to document. Now dated: Nov 24, 2014.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
David--
Pair production, which I assume you agree is real, creates mass from empty
space. What is the source of this mass, or the equivalent energy? What is the
mechanism that makes this happen?
The parameter of spin associated with the electron and the positron that are
produced in the
Pair production is fairly well established from what I have read. In that case
energy is converted into mass but I do not recall any mention of the real pair
appearing without some type of input.
In particle accelerators mass is created in the form of new particles from the
energy contained
I agree. All the inventors have been working for a long time on LENR and knew
Focardi as a fellow scientist--at least Piantelli and Chellini did. Milan and
Bologna have been the hotbed for this science.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
please see
http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html
*The Schwinger effect: non-perturbative vacuum pair production*
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
David--
Pair production, which I assume you agree is real, creates mass from empty
more...
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1106.5965.pdf
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
please see
http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html
*The Schwinger effect: non-perturbative vacuum pair production*
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Bob Cook
That is a great link. Axil thanks.
The voltage requirement may be reached in SPP's as they collapse and their
intense magnetic field changes rapidly. Has the voltage between two pair
electrons or protons been calculated. The electric field must be pretty great
up close to a pair of
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1032v1.pdf
A EMF field that equals or exceeds the mass equivalent of a meson (140 MeV)
will produce mesons from the vacuum. This is the cold fusion mechanism in a
nutshell.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
That is a great
Axil--
You mean we just stumbled on it? Inside the nutshell that is?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They call me a moron. A reply.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1032v1.pdf
A EMF field that
I've thought enough--I'm headed for bed--:)
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:They call me a moron. A reply.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1032v1.pdf
A EMF field that equals or exceeds the mass
Ok, so I am not super optimistic that current physics is right about quite
a lot...
But there is a strong line of reasoning that light should create some
degree of gravity.
And as such, then enough light in a small enough space should create a
black hole.
And if that is so, then higher
http://inspirehep.net/record/1118984/files/arXiv%3A1206.4276.pdf
*Analog Hawking radiation from an acoustic black hole in a flowing
polariton superuid*
We theoretically study Hawking radiation processes from an analog acoustic
black hole in a flowing superuid of exciton-polaritons in a
50 matches
Mail list logo
