Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP)

I wrote: β+ + β- → 2ɣ + Q (511 keV) > > I think that should be: β+ + β- → 2ɣ + Q (1.02 MeV) > > (I.e., two photons of 511 keV each.) Eric

Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP)

Hi, Just arrived from Bob Greenyer (MFMP): > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ntgj0_CUo2U9Ic0lgoHEFgezpXZq6vIcbkD1LP2zLuk/ > As Bob Cook notes, any β+ decay will result in annihilation photons: β+ + β- → 2ɣ + Q (511 keV) Once the positron is produced, it will quickly find an electro

Re: [Vo]:review of theoretical ideas

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:37 PM, wrote: If all the nuclei move in unison, then they can be hot (i.e. vibrating), > yet in > their own frame of reference they are all stationary with respect to one > another. What causes the atoms to move in unison, in contrast to normal, chaotic movement? Eric

Re: [Vo]:review of theoretical ideas

In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:27:24 +0100: Hi Alain, [snip] I already did over a decade ago on this list. If all the nuclei move in unison, then they can be hot (i.e. vibrating), yet in their own frame of reference they are all stationary with respect to one another. T

[Vo]:22 Passi announcement

See please the message re a replication announcement- Daniele Passerini has sent to Frank Acland - ECatWorld. It will appear at 0:22 AM local time (Perugia) and is not from US, Italy and Russia. I wonder why the same opportunity is NOT taken to distribute the new book of JK Rowlings:"Harry Potter a

[Vo]:LENR theory discussions restarted, news very bad and good

Dear Friends, Poor Sasha was 8 years younger than me, I have met him at Minsk in1993. Serious, a good professional and and a nice colleague, I regret him much.. for today see please: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/03/a-sad-day-lenr-theory-discussed-www-of.html A mixture of ideas and news.

[Vo]:Alexander Karabut dies

Cold fusion researcher Dr. Alexander Karabut died in Moscow, Russia, yesterday. (I think it was yesterday.) He suffered a stroke 10 days ago.

Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP)

Mats and Bob-- This is an interesting spread sheet. My down load stopped at column AA, rows 169 and 176, for some reason and I could not read all the notes. It would be desirable in the spread sheet to include the intrinsic angular momentum (spin) associated with the particles and nuclei inv

[Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP)

Just arrived from Bob Greenyer (MFMP): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ntgj0_CUo2U9Ic0lgoHEFgezpXZq6vIcbkD1LP2zLuk/ Mats www.animpossibleinvention.com

Re: [Vo]:review of theoretical ideas

my question is mostly about the general feasibility whatever is the mechanism. I think that thermodynamic consideration is what is missing in my scenario. take the mega-atom. it is probably created by consuming energy from pressure, consuming gibbs energy available. transforming a statistic group