E-mail from Stephen Lawrence, edited letter from Lomax and correction
posted last night to NET blog comments:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/?p=113#comments
At 06:27 AM 2/19/2010, you wrote:
You can see a list of papers and download the Sourcebook EndNote records
for Vol. 1 here:
http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841269668
It looks like you can get the full papers if you have sponsored access.
I do not know what that is.
That means ACS is giving
At 08:35 AM 2/19/2010, you wrote:
Ya gotta like this guy Kims open-minded thought process. And to think
he is at Purdue and has not been silenced ?
I notice that he and Rusi were both hired on at the same time in 2003. Go
figure. Maybe Kim is next in line to get the axe from those
Storms responds, Krivit responds:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/?p=126#comment-7388
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Expt-HH/SRI-Experiment-HH.shtml
Vorts,
I have deliberately not provided any explanation, analysis or interpretation.
Instead, I'd like to hear your thoughts first.
In particular, I'd like to hear your thoughts on the graph drawn by McKubre
as
I don't see any problem or confusion with this. Maybe I am missing
something. The bottom graph (Krivit's) is a little confusing. It would be
improved with:
1. The error bars.
2. The power on the right y-axis starting at zero.
Good ideas Jed.
Done.
Let me know if that helps clarify.
s
Jed,
Without seeing a lot more heat data, I have to agree, it is difficult to
derive any meaning from this and that there is, as you say, practically no
real-time correlation to the helium. We also are missing a lot of
information about their method of helium sampling.
Steve
At 08:29 PM
(I was amused to see a skeptic the other day suggest that when Rob
Duncan visited Energetics Technology, he should have surreptitiously
attached a flask to the cell and taken a sample of helium to see if it
really is fusion. I told the skeptic you have to design the experiment
from the
I haven't taken the time to look into this in detail, but my first
impression is that, unless there is a typo, it makes no sense at all
to attempt to draw the 23.82 MeV line through Fig. 1, or to draw any
conclusions from the graph as to energy per helium atom produced.
Perhaps I'm misreading
At 09:54 AM 2/25/2010, you wrote:
Okay, I asked McKubre why he thinks the helium in the Case cell declined.
Here is part of his response, edited to remove irrelevant comments:
. . . I am glad [Krivit and the rest of you people] are encouraged to read
the paper . . .
Our gas cells are
Can you believe this???
The
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/federal_communications_commission/index.html?inline=nyt-orgFederal
Communications Commission is proposing an ambitious 10-year plan that will
reimagine the nation's media and technology priorities
Aha! That expains it.
At 02:28 PM 3/13/2010, you wrote:
It's called 'convergence'. All major corporations' enterprise
networks already work this way. Voice, video and data are all on the
same network.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergence_(telecommunications)
It will happen. It's just
Ladies and gentlemen,
The truth is, I plead, to a large degree, ignorance of this FocardiRossi
matter.
It had been originally brought to my attention as a patent, and then I
pointed out to the person it was merely a patent application and I said,
So what, don't bother me.
Even granted
At 02:35 AM 3/14/2010, you wrote:
Interesting, but why would Focardi discredit his own work?
I don't think he would want to.
Have you been following the thread more closely than I?
Is there any support on this research such as a published paper or a
conference presentation or is it just
At 01:46 AM 3/15/2010, you wrote:
2010/3/14 Steven Krivit stev...@newenergytimes.com:
At 02:35 AM 3/14/2010, you wrote:
Interesting, but why would Focardi discredit his own work?
I don't think he would want to.
Then it can't be a Ni-H research discrediting operation can it? Or one
would
Dear Vorts,
I see by the subject header that some messages on Vortex have been directed
at me personally again.
I had thought people on Vortex were more mature than this.
I had thought people on Vortex had less tolerance for personal attacks.
I had thought that personal attacks were
Jed:
If other nations are quicker to develop new energy technology than the
U.S., then an entire system of economic and political balance may become
unstable. This would be a matter of national security just as much, if not
more threatening, than bombs. There is the slight possibility that in
NEW ENERGY
TIMES News Flash, July 27, 2004
The best source for news, information and general education
on cold fusion.
Boston Globe: Heating up a cold
theory
I am overjoyed to bring to your attention an excellent
article in today's Boston Globe by Ms. Beth Daley.
I'd ask him personally, but I don't want to provoke him any more that I
already have... and will...
At 02:51 PM 8/8/2004 -0400, you wrote:
This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not
anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did
not even
Bill B.,
Rochus has moved his website from
http://web.archive.org/web/20030628043116/http://mathpost.la.asu.edu/~boerner/skepticism.html)
to
http://www.suppressedscience.net/
Steve
Jed,
I'm glad to hear you have found a way to tie sex into cold fusion. I knew
there *had* to be some sort of connection. The field can get quite boring
sometimes. Your book should do well. ;)
Steve
Here is the abbreviated version, which I promised Ed Storms I would not
transmit to
Indeed. Elizabeth Shue again or do we have votes for a new dream-fusionista?
At 09:33 PM 10/14/2004 -0800, you wrote:
At 11:26 PM 10/14/4, Colin Quinney wrote:
Steve,
Pardon my interrupt here but regarding sex and cold fusion, it just won't
sell. Jed must name the book Warm Fusion, or better
Hell is thawing
At 05:53 PM 10/8/2004 -0400, you wrote:
I am sorry to see this news:
http://www.nature.com/news/2004/041004/full/041004-19.html
Here is something amazing though; Nature actually deigns to mention CF is
semi-partly-conceivably positive manner. The rest of the article is bunk,
Hey Vorts...
I met Naudin and interviewed him a bit but he declined to go on record.
I know who is paying his salary though I can't disclose it. It is a major
agency in France.
He was quite nervous about me talking with him and I found that interesting.
I am undecided as to whether he is a
NEW ENERGY
TIMES TM Newsletter, Nov. 16,
2004 -- Issue #7
Your best source for cold fusion news and
information.
Copyright 2004 New
Energy Times (tm)
Table of Contents:
New Book on Cold Fusion Available Now
U.S. Department of Energy 2004 Cold Fusion Review
11th International Conference on
NEW ENERGY
TIMES TM Newsletter, Nov. 16,
2004 -- Issue #7
Your best source for cold fusion news and
information.
Copyright 2004 New
Energy Times (tm)
Table of Contents:
New Book on Cold Fusion Available Now
U.S. Department of Energy 2004 Cold Fusion Review
11th International Conference on
, to the chagrin of some, contained information which the presenters at the conference did not intend to release publicly. The independent Web sites are maintained by two former information technology specialists, Steven Krivit and William Collis, respectively.
Despite the fact that conference
I was hoping that someone from ICCF11 had a commment
about the Israeli company, Energetics Technologies,
mentioned in the article, or the presentation by
El-Boher, which apparently... at least McKubre thinks
is pretty near to having a commercial product.
This someone will. I spent quite a bit of
Welcome Haiko!
Steve
I may be able to help. Please give them my number.
Steve
(310) 721.5919
At 01:17 PM 1/3/2005, you wrote:
Fellow Vortexians;
Rumor has it that the University of Minnesota is looking for a cold fusion
researcher. Dr. Orimi (sp), emeritus mechanical engineering has published
several papers which
http://newenergytimes.com/reports/ICCF11-2005-CoreyJim-Trip%20Report.pdf
Steve
At 12:31 PM 1/9/2005, you wrote:
Perhaps the majority (~60%) of Americans aren't concerned.
However, I would say the rest of Americans are concerned.
The popularity of Fahrenheit 911 is a good example.
Apathy rules I guess.
Aw, who cares, anyway!
s
NEW ENERGY
TIMES (tm) Jan. 10, 2005 -- Issue
#8
Your best source for cold fusion news and information.
Copyright 2005 New
Energy Times (tm)
All photos by S.B. Krivit unless otherwise noted
Available as follows:
1. E-mail version without images available to newsletter
subscribers.
2. Full
RC,
I, like Jed, question your assertions. While I agree with you that the
Japanese are taking this more seriously than the U.S., your claims seem
greatly exaggerated. Do you have any evidence to back them up or to
demonstrate how you might know this?
At 10:13 AM 1/26/2005 -0500, you wrote:
RC
The radial pattern of the bottom of they pyrex is interesting.
No, I don't.
I guess I approach things differently.
I don't make statements about the cold fusion field unless I have
evidence to back them up.
At 07:35 PM 1/26/2005 -0600, you wrote:
Steve, I may
pose the question.. do you have any evidence they are NOT ?
The industrial world is busy, ask
Your theory should be somewhat testable with a little *flypaper*... ;)
s
If you want to get an indication of how many people, and sometimes even
the identities of the people or organizations, who are doing research in
your particular field, simply publish your work, and then read the logs
on
While we are on the subject of the Web, I recommend the new Mozilla
Firefox in place of the well known browser from you-know-who that is
usually referred to by its initials so that it sounds like Aaeee (or
Oy Gevalt! in plain English.)
- Jed
What I like most about it so far is it's
www.eugenemallove.org
Ed,
It was filmed starting about 10 days ago. He is currently travelling from
NY to Los Angeles. He films each day, edits on his laptop (while driving!)
and then uploads the MPG via the Internet once he docks each night.
Steve
At 11:33 AM 2/7/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Thanks, Steve. Hume did a
Mark,
Incldently, he was a test pilot for Nazi V1 flying bombs. He would ride
them up and then jump off and parachute down.
That's pretty wild. How would such bombs be launched? I'm picturing a
cartoon-like scenario of a man wrapping his arms around a missile...
Vorts-
Incidentally, Mark has
At 08:21 PM 2/9/2005 -0500, you wrote:
Jeff writes:
What is our collective goal regarding the commercialization of
CF?
Is it to reduce the level of CO2 emissions to reverse global
warming?
I think Bockris put it most succinctly: It is the basis of a way
to continue our Civilization.
I've
That site is the brian-child of former mathematics grad student Rochus
Boerner (Arizona State) who moved back to Germany last year.
http://www.suppressedscience.net/
http://www.suppressedscience.net/physics.html
Many thanks for those two URLs Jed. They contain
some very useful stuff. It's nice
Hey Jed,
You have my synthesis. The same think happens with my voice re-order system
two.
Steve
At 02:21 PM 2/10/2005 -0500, you wrote:
I wrote:
He and the other hard core components are amazing.
I meant opponents. That is what you get when you dictate a message to
voice input and press the
You have my sympathies Jed.
Although I charge for my CF book, I, like you, didn't write it to make
money. Getting out the word of my book, and the subject, is a tough sell
right now and I think it's all about what you said, these people will not
risk their reputations to endorse cold fusion --
I also want to say to the Vortex group that I really appreciate the recent
insightful, articulate and well-reasoned discussions that have occurred
here of late. While there may not be any streets or homes here, this is
clearly a well-defined and functional community. It is a place that I can
It turned out they literally flew by the seat of their pants.
That's profound!
s
Oh my goodness looks like you've got some clear and horrific facts
here
Yes, I'm familiar with revenue streams. I've been in IT for 17 years and
seen the major emphasis and push for the big boys in IT to develop them in
services once they realized that hardware and software sales were
Nice one, Jed
If several hundred researchers could all make large mistakes using 100
and 200-year-old techniques, science would never work in the first place.
That is like asserting that you can select 200 carpenters at random, have
each of them build a wooden house, and when they finish every
what facts did he cite?
At 03:38 PM 2/14/2005 -0600, you wrote:
Michael Medved, michaelmedved.com interviewed Peter Huber author of The
Bottomless Well. Huber poopooed Hupert's Peak thesis. According to him,
there are enough petroleum resources in this hemisphere to last the entire
world for a
have !). Caveat: this criticism relates to the first ORNL
announcement and they may have issued an addenda, but if so,
it didn't make the news.
I am told that the second paper addressed the criticism from the first
paper:
http://newenergytimes.com/news/8.htm#impulsedevices
s
Dear Vorts,
I am seeking to get coverage of some CF-related news, possibly in Spokane,
WA next month.
Is there anybody in the area with a digital recorder, a couple of hours of
time, and some curiosity?
This request comes with no pay but an offer for genuine appreciation and
recognition.
Reply
Thomas,
I don't understand how hot fusion in bubbles differs from what the other
LERN researchers are doing,
I've written about this in detail in my book, and also in part, in two
articles in the New Energy Times newsletter #8
http://newenergytimes.com/news/8.htm . Search on bubble and
Uggh
:)
Incidentally, based on my experiences dealing with people who oppose cold
fusion, I do not think any of them -- Park, the Japanese, or the Sci. Am.
editors -- has the slightest inkling he might be wrong. They sincerely
believe that cold fusion is 100% unadulterated fraud and garbage.
I have
Frank,
You want press attention?
I'll give you press attention.
Start a research program to develop a CF bomb with the
avowed intention of saving America by getting there
before the terrorists do. You will get all the press
attention you can handle - and then some. Probably
get quite a lot of
Because he said he will probably retire. He is giving up. He has been
trying for years to get funding. He even thought of going to China. I shot
back an answer saying Wait! I will do my best to help. The other readers
here should pitch in, and tell Mel Miles you stand with him.
- Jed
Jed,
I
Jed,
Just a thought .. it may be more strategic to posture DOE as acting more
ridiculously rather than unfairly.
Steve
You must be filtering my messages, too! g
FAIR WARNING:
Wikipedia, like Vortex, has its own culture, and exists as a fairly
well-defined community along with their own written and unwritten rules.
The Wiki cold fusion page appears to be run by people who are for the most
part, very different
I have his CV - yep, it's Oriani
W.R. Whitney Award (1987) winner: Richard Oriani.
Bingo. He is indeed an expert in CF.
- Jed
Korean patent
On http://iesiusa.com/intellectual.html there is a list of
patents, but I don't recognize the number format. Can someone
help? 10-20020026277 would be particularly interesting.
:)
Steve
Good work Robin.
From their SEC filing (on their Web site)
Patents
1. Hydrogen Technology
1. Korean Patent Application No. 10-2002-0026277 Energy Generating
Device
This patent has only been filed in Korean and has not been translated
into English. The patent basically describes how the
Jed,
Potopov is before my time. Can you say just a word or two about it?
It worked? Didn't work? Status unknown?
Thanks,
Steve
At 02:25 PM 3/3/2005 -0500, you wrote:
A Friend wrote to me:
The people I know who have been [to visit IESI] and seen the equipment
can't say anything other than there
At 03:31 PM 3/3/2005 -0900, you wrote:
Why not simply make a short statement that is not arguable. Something
like: A differing minority view is held by over 200 retired scientists and
university professors who are working on cold fusion energy. For related
publications see:
Why not develop a computer game in which you
first have to kidnap various scientists such
as Dr Bones and Professor Fleshman and then
persuade them using various macabre instruments
Don't forget the evil Dr. Park, attempting to protect the establishment at
all costs.
Keep with the theme, that
Jed wrote:
Yes, I do -- for a good reason. The short segment they broadcast with Ira
Flatow was quite fair and accurate. Flatow has often communicated with us
that he knows what the story is. He was a little timid, but accurate. I am
hoping the other reporters on NPR contact him and discuss
That is true. And yet Flatow's report was accurate and positive, albeit
timid. Some people in the media get away with reporting facts about cold
fusion, and they are not punished by losing access. I suspect the others
would also escape unscathed, but perhaps they are cowards and do not want
Horace,
You may be care to send this to Gustav GROB email: info at uniseo.org. He
may have an interest, as well as an influence to see something productive
happen with your ideas.
Steve
This article seems a bit absurd. It refers to the bubble temp of 15,000
deg. C as 4 times as hot as the sun.
Wanna bet somebody lost three zeros?
s
Horgan say we have reached the end of science already, and they are doing
their level best to fulfill this prophesy. Fleischmann thinks they will
win. I hope not, but I don't know.
Yes, Martin sure does.
Posted last night:
http://newenergytimes.com/Conversations/FleischmannByLietz.htm
s
Hey Jed,
Congratulations on your progress on the Wiki CF page. You have been
surprisingly diplomatic ;) . I also respect the time you put in as
evidenced by the discussion page.
It seems to have paid off. Your contribution is significant for two
reasons: 1. Your corrections to Energy source vs
True empirical observations.
I guess it could have been worse..there are other senses he could have used. ;)
At 08:42 PM 3/21/2005 -0900, you wrote:
Occasionally one runs across something that MUST be shared. Curiosity: an
essential ingrediant for science. See:
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:59:26 +0100
From: Haiko Lietz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
This email is to let you know about my report on MHI's transmutation
experiments on German National Radio.
Incidentally it was aired on today's 16th anniversary of the announcement
of cold fusion.
German
Perhaps it will be the best for the general public, but for scientists
nothing can beat original sources.
True.
Scott Chubb and I had a very pleasant talk with Jack Sandweiss, editor of
Physical Review Letters, and also Prof. at Yale University yesterday at the
APS conference. He seemed truly
Jed,
Pessimistic, yes. Logical and realistic, yes. Perhaps we need miracle #4,
whatever that will be.
Steve
done - thanks for the address
At 02:52 PM 3/24/2005 -0800, you wrote:
I think you can reach the author
at;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.seti.org/site/pp.asp?c=ktJ2J9MMIsEb=179047
Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do you contact these idots?!? I do not see a contact page or editor.
Lets get back
to science.
Richard
Amen to that!
s
Thanks Terry.
I was wondering when we'd see those predictions in the
mainstream.
Funny that they use the word spike.
s
At 08:49 AM 4/1/2005 -0800, you wrote:
Goldman Sachs analysis sees $105
super spike:
http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/050331/323/ffes2.html
Do you Yahoo!?
Better first dates. More
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
APRIL 20, 2005
CONTACT:
Melissa Brown
New Energy Times
(310) 470-8189
COLD FUSION GOES BACK TO SCHOOL AT
THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
CAMBRIDGE, MASS, April 20, 2005 -- The Massachusetts Institute of
Technology will host a daylong colloquium May 21, on the
Could this similarity to sonofusion be part of
Putterman's nefarious agenda... you remember, in his
recent downplaying of normal sonofusion. This guy
could end up being a bad actor in terms of
intellectual-greed, so to speak... but thanks to the
internet his past deeds will likely catch up with
This is hilarious...
The Economist article is titled: Cold fusion -
Honest!
I haven't seen the Science article yet, but the title looks like it too,
is relating the story to cold fusion.
The UCLA team should have given their work a nifty name like
Crystal Fusion to give the press something to
Hmmm. Not good.
At 05:43 PM 5/2/2005 -0400, you wrote:
These ICCF-11 papers are depressing. There are only a few experimental
papers. Most are reviews of old work, or papers about theory. As far as I
can tell, most of the theory is of the crackpot variety, and usually about
subjects unrelated
Your best source for news and information on low energy nuclear
reactions
September 10, 2006 -- Issue #18
ISSUE #18 is available online at
http://newenergytimes.com/news/2006/NET18.htm
EDITORIALS AND OPINION
1.
From the
Editor
2.
To the
Editor
NEWS ANNOUNCEMENTS
3.
The
Communications
working on it..
s
At 07:50 PM 9/30/2006, you wrote:
Has anyone got anything more about the recent Chinese claim of producing
fusion power from their 'EAST' reactor.
Well, some of you attempted to intervene, and I applaud you, whoever it
was, but it seems the like things are a bit out of control there at the moment.
I'm appalled that such destruction could occur and that it has been left
to stand. Let them have their way. One day they will wake up to a
Yang's going strong, as far as I know...but flying way below the
radar.
Stringham's probably got something viable but I suspect he's trying to
negotiate his fair share of the bucket of gold.
I've heard no details from Energetics but they're a wildcard...they have
a large and dynamic team and
Your best source for news and information on low energy nuclear
reactions
October 16, 2006
Lefteri Tsoukalas has resigned as head of the School of Nuclear
Engineering today, according to Purdue spokeswoman Jeanne Norberg.
Tsoukalas remains on staff at Purdue, Norberg said.
Tsoukalas was one
Terry.. Bravo for identifying those blips on the radarvery
insightful...I'll pass this along to some folks I know in commodities and
see what I get...
At 08:41 AM 10/31/2006, you wrote:
Does anyone know what is happenin' with BP? Their share price is near
it's year low, they have closed
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:36:44 -0800
From: Steve Krivit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Beyond Petroleum
aha...good info...thanks
they don't call themselves British Petroleum anymore ...just BP... ughh.
Maybe I can forgo the name Steve Krivit and just have people call me SK?
;)
SK
At
Thanks to Bill Beaty's inspiring science videos on YouTube, I've decided to
start putting up some of my own content.
So when you're really bored and have nothing to do, here's the first piece.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ke_ZhgAKjhs
Short documentary on SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego Low
Jed,
Good idea. Done.
Steve:
You or someone else with an account at you tube should go back and add a
brief message saying that people can read papers by SPAWARS researchers at
your webpage and LENR-CANR.org. A couple of comments have been posted in
which people express confusion about
Hi Jones,
Thanks for the encouragement. I have a whole lot of video content that has
been piling up. I've been sort of struggling with the technology... wmv vs.
rp or both? mp4 vs. swf? stream vs. download?
This is my first experience with UT and I love it. SWF is the ideal format
but it
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/USNavy.htm
If it is a pain in the butt to change this, don't bother.
No problema
s
AN OPEN LETTER TO RUSS GEORGE
Dear Mr. George,
It's been six months since we published our report in New Energy Times
on your work and that of D2Fusion.
People in the CMNS community are still asking me as recently as last
week if D2Fusion ever provided any form of response, either formal
Your best source for news and information on low energy nuclear
reactions
November 10, 2006 -- Issue #19
ISSUE #19 is available online at
http://newenergytimes.com/news/2006/NET19.htm
EDITORIALS AND OPINION
1.
Guest
Editorial
2.
To the
Editor
NEWS ANNOUNCEMENTS
3.
The 13th
International
At 07:30 AM 11/10/2006, you wrote:
I have supplied a Subject Header. We'll see if it
takes. Looks like Steve has become infected with
blank-Vo syndrome. Glad I'm not the only one.
I don't know why the header dropped. I sent the same exact message to the
CMNS list and the header (subject line)
Actually, as far as the high voltage - Claytor did
employ that with success some time ago, if I'm not
mistaken.
Jones,
Through the electrolytic circuit or in an outside field?
Steve
Did I miss anything ... err ... other than... well the thing which is most
likely of all of these g
That being:
7) an alteration in time itself such that a normal QM probability
distributions and determinations become highly skewed.
Jones
Good lord!
;)
Steve
Greetings Mike,
Would you be pleased to know that you are the first to find a flaw in our
article? I am honored that it was found by you and I am not surprised
considering your expert background.
current now reads potential
I'll run that B-field value by the team early next week and report
1 - 100 of 561 matches
Mail list logo
