RE: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Axil—

There is only one thing to focus on in the Kim discussion from 2010 that you 
have identified.  That is the prediction of the wimpzilla particle in the mass 
range of 10-e 24 to 10-e 27 eV.That should be worth
$25 B to discover experimentally.  (See page 18 of 98 of the Kim presentation.)

It probably is the answer to the dark mass issue.

Bob Cook



From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 7:10:45 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

Magnetic energy...spin can add mass to left handed quarks.

This subject is a big and a complicated area in particle physics. It is not a 
mythe,

I am now reading this

http://susy10.uni-bonn.de/data/KimJEpreSUSY.pdf

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:51 PM, 
bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> 
<bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
It sounds like your explanation in more mythe about quasi particles and 
instantons.   Changing colors and flavors is another way of saying a coherent 
system coupled by electric, magnetic and gravitational  fields can change 
potential energy to spin energy and other forms of kinetic energy, with 
conservation of angular momentum and total energy—kinetic plus potential.

Bob Cook


From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 11:53:57 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

Quarks that are in a strong magnetic field will generate instantons. These 
instantons are quasiparticles formed from magnetism that adds mass to the 
quark. The mass added by magnetism can be great enough to change the flavor of 
the quark(s) thus disrupting the hadron that confine the quark(s). This is what 
happens in Holmlid's experiment where a proton or a neutron is converted to a 
kaon by magnetism via instanton generation. The up and down quark in changed to 
a strange quark through the addition of new mass carried by the magnetically 
induced instantons.

The metallic hydrogen produced by Holmlid is a powerful generator of magnetism.

Related to the above, I have uncovered a new dot in the LENR puzzle to connect, 
it is called the Nelson-Barr mechanism. I will try to understand it and will 
post on it when I figure it out some. If anyone already understand this 
mechanism, please post on it.

To become familiar with the Quark jargon, here is a video that uses a lot of it.

http://pirsa.org/displayFlash.php?id=16100033

What the presenter is after is to show why the hadron is stable under the 
action of instantons, But he shows a condition of "danger" where quarks change 
their flavor. This danger condition is what LENR is all about. This video is 
where I first ran across the Nelson-Barr mechanism.



On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Russ George 
<russ.geo...@gmail.com<mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Just why this insistence on holding on to quark couples or karasses go on is 
puzzling, when a simple bag model for quarks offers the simpler solution. No 
need for melting quarks if their natural ecological state is melted. It’s just 
about how they decide to emerge into our world where and when the energy and 
matter balance make things interesting for us.

From: Bob Higgins 
[mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:37 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene 
<jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in 
finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP

AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark 
and hard to observe} other than


  1.  Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
  2.  Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
  3.  Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles

Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and 
probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. 
One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, 
each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for 
the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 
60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.

This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in 
the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which 
itself is another dimension.

Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[Axil Axil]

Magnetic energy...spin can add mass to left handed quarks.

This subject is a big and a complicated area in particle physics. It is not
a mythe,

I am now reading this

http://susy10.uni-bonn.de/data/KimJEpreSUSY.pdf

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:51 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com <
bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> It sounds like your explanation in more mythe about quasi particles and
> instantons.   Changing colors and flavors is another way of saying a
> coherent system coupled by electric, magnetic and gravitational  fields can
> change potential energy to spin energy and other forms of kinetic energy,
> with conservation of angular momentum and total energy—kinetic plus
> potential.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
> --
> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 9, 2017 11:53:57 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter
>
> Quarks that are in a strong magnetic field will generate instantons. These
> instantons are quasiparticles formed from magnetism that adds mass to the
> quark. The mass added by magnetism can be great enough to change the flavor
> of the quark(s) thus disrupting the hadron that confine the quark(s). This
> is what happens in Holmlid's experiment where a proton or a neutron is
> converted to a kaon by magnetism via instanton generation. The up and down
> quark in changed to a strange quark through the addition of new mass
> carried by the magnetically induced instantons.
>
> The metallic hydrogen produced by Holmlid is a powerful generator of
> magnetism.
>
> Related to the above, I have uncovered a new dot in the LENR puzzle to
> connect, it is called the Nelson-Barr mechanism. I will try to
> understand it and will post on it when I figure it out some. If anyone
> already understand this mechanism, please post on it.
>
> To become familiar with the Quark jargon, here is a video that uses a lot
> of it.
>
> http://pirsa.org/displayFlash.php?id=16100033
>
> What the presenter is after is to show why the hadron is stable under the
> action of instantons, But he shows a condition of "danger" where
> quarks change their flavor. This danger condition is what LENR is all
> about. This video is where I first ran across the Nelson-Barr mechanism.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just why this insistence on holding on to quark couples or karasses go on
>> is puzzling, when a simple bag model for quarks offers the simpler
>> solution. No need for melting quarks if their natural ecological state is
>> melted. It’s just about how they decide to emerge into our world where and
>> when the energy and matter balance make things interesting for us.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:37 PM
>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter
>>
>>
>>
>> But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>> Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of
>> success in finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP
>>
>>
>>
>> AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are
>> dark and hard to observe} other than
>>
>>
>>
>>1. Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
>>2. Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
>>3. Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features
>>
>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles
>>
>>
>>
>> Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and
>> probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs
>> field. One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to
>> two WIMPs, each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or
>> about 63 GeV for the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the
>> same mass equal to 60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is
>> UDH in the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs
>> field which itself is another dimension.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

It sounds like your explanation in more mythe about quasi particles and 
instantons.   Changing colors and flavors is another way of saying a coherent 
system coupled by electric, magnetic and gravitational  fields can change 
potential energy to spin energy and other forms of kinetic energy, with 
conservation of angular momentum and total energy—kinetic plus potential.

Bob Cook


From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 11:53:57 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

Quarks that are in a strong magnetic field will generate instantons. These 
instantons are quasiparticles formed from magnetism that adds mass to the 
quark. The mass added by magnetism can be great enough to change the flavor of 
the quark(s) thus disrupting the hadron that confine the quark(s). This is what 
happens in Holmlid's experiment where a proton or a neutron is converted to a 
kaon by magnetism via instanton generation. The up and down quark in changed to 
a strange quark through the addition of new mass carried by the magnetically 
induced instantons.

The metallic hydrogen produced by Holmlid is a powerful generator of magnetism.

Related to the above, I have uncovered a new dot in the LENR puzzle to connect, 
it is called the Nelson-Barr mechanism. I will try to understand it and will 
post on it when I figure it out some. If anyone already understand this 
mechanism, please post on it.

To become familiar with the Quark jargon, here is a video that uses a lot of it.

http://pirsa.org/displayFlash.php?id=16100033

What the presenter is after is to show why the hadron is stable under the 
action of instantons, But he shows a condition of "danger" where quarks change 
their flavor. This danger condition is what LENR is all about. This video is 
where I first ran across the Nelson-Barr mechanism.



On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Russ George 
<russ.geo...@gmail.com<mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Just why this insistence on holding on to quark couples or karasses go on is 
puzzling, when a simple bag model for quarks offers the simpler solution. No 
need for melting quarks if their natural ecological state is melted. It’s just 
about how they decide to emerge into our world where and when the energy and 
matter balance make things interesting for us.

From: Bob Higgins 
[mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:37 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene 
<jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in 
finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP

AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark 
and hard to observe} other than


  1.  Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
  2.  Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
  3.  Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles

Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and 
probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. 
One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, 
each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for 
the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 
60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.

This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in 
the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which 
itself is another dimension.

Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[Axil Axil]

Quarks that are in a strong magnetic field will generate instantons. These
instantons are quasiparticles formed from magnetism that adds mass to the
quark. The mass added by magnetism can be great enough to change the flavor
of the quark(s) thus disrupting the hadron that confine the quark(s). This
is what happens in Holmlid's experiment where a proton or a neutron is
converted to a kaon by magnetism via instanton generation. The up and down
quark in changed to a strange quark through the addition of new mass
carried by the magnetically induced instantons.

The metallic hydrogen produced by Holmlid is a powerful generator of
magnetism.

Related to the above, I have uncovered a new dot in the LENR puzzle to
connect, it is called the Nelson-Barr mechanism. I will try to
understand it and will post on it when I figure it out some. If anyone
already understand this mechanism, please post on it.

To become familiar with the Quark jargon, here is a video that uses a lot
of it.

http://pirsa.org/displayFlash.php?id=16100033

What the presenter is after is to show why the hadron is stable under the
action of instantons, But he shows a condition of "danger" where
quarks change their flavor. This danger condition is what LENR is all
about. This video is where I first ran across the Nelson-Barr mechanism.



On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just why this insistence on holding on to quark couples or karasses go on
> is puzzling, when a simple bag model for quarks offers the simpler
> solution. No need for melting quarks if their natural ecological state is
> melted. It’s just about how they decide to emerge into our world where and
> when the energy and matter balance make things interesting for us.
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:37 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter
>
>
>
> But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of
> success in finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP
>
>
>
> AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are
> dark and hard to observe} other than
>
>
>
>1. Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
>2. Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
>3. Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features
>
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles
>
>
>
> Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and
> probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs
> field. One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to
> two WIMPs, each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or
> about 63 GeV for the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the
> same mass equal to 60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.
>
>
>
> This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is
> UDH in the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs
> field which itself is another dimension.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

They are Bose particles with zero spin and are electrical neutral.   They are 
held together by gravity, which, as suggested by Unified Gravity. works at 
small distances in an unexpected way.

High energy EM radiation may interact, if it has the correct resonant frequency 
to react with the heavy Bose particles making up the defuse heavy matter in 
galaxies, given  that  such heavy matter has not been swept into a black hole.

Bob Cook


From: Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 8:36:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?


On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene 
<jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in 
finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP

AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark 
and hard to observe} other than


  1.  Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
  2.  Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
  3.  Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles

Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and 
probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. 
One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, 
each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for 
the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 
60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.

This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in 
the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which 
itself is another dimension.

RE: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[JonesBeene]

Good question Bob.

In general, there is an inverse relationship between the internal binding 
strength within a particle and its reactivity with its neighboring particles..

But… that is not sufficient for this case, as I’m sure you will agree; and if I 
were pressed to invent a logical rationale for the proposition - it would be a 
buoyancy concept. Such as that 3-space itself, as well as 2-space, both have a 
property analogous to surface tension and buoyancy, and any particle which 
becomes “too dense to float” in one dimension must sinks into a lower dimension 
(or fractal). Think about the implications of the extreme density which Holmlid 
suggests. Perhaps the answer is as simple as some kind of fractal dimensional 
buoyancy.

If we espouse Mandelbrot’s definition of a fractal as being a fractional 
dimension in the literal sense, then a dense particle like UDH will sink out of 
3-space and even out of 2-space – into a fractal from where its reactivity is 
all but gone. It may be more than one dimensional but less than two and its 
gravity would be felt, but little else.

Of course, that is an invented rationale and cannot be taken seriously without 
some real evidence for it. 

OTOH the only way I can rationalize Hotson’s epo field is as a fractal, and I 
think there is some similarity.



From: Bob Higgins

But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?

JonesBeene wrote:
Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in 
finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP
 
AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark 
and hard to observe} other than
 
1. Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
2. Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
3. Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles
 
Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and 
probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. 
One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, 
each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for 
the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 
60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.
 
This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in 
the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which 
itself is another dimension.
 
 
 

RE: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[Russ George]

Just why this insistence on holding on to quark couples or karasses go on is 
puzzling, when a simple bag model for quarks offers the simpler solution. No 
need for melting quarks if their natural ecological state is melted. It’s just 
about how they decide to emerge into our world where and when the energy and 
matter balance make things interesting for us.

 

From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:37 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

 

But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?

 

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net 
<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> > wrote:

Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in 
finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP

 

AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark 
and hard to observe} other than

 

1.  Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
2.  Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
3.  Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles

 

Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and 
probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. 
One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, 
each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for 
the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 
60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.

 

This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in 
the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which 
itself is another dimension.

 

 

 

 

Re: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[Bob Higgins]

But why would such large particles be weakly interacting?

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, JonesBeene  wrote:

> Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of
> success in finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP
>
>
>
> AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are
> dark and hard to observe} other than
>
>
>
>1. Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
>2. Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
>3. Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features
>
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles
>
>
>
> Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and
> probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs
> field. One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to
> two WIMPs, each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or
> about 63 GeV for the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the
> same mass equal to 60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.
>
>
>
> This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is
> UDH in the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs
> field which itself is another dimension.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

It would be interesting to know whether the Lipinski theory of gravity would 
predict stability of a half Higgs boson?  Maybe Unified Gravity will do the 
calculation.

Bob Cook

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10


From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 7:14:35 AM
To: Vortex List
Subject: [Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in 
finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP

AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark 
and hard to observe} other than


  1.  Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
  2.  Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
  3.  Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles

Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and 
probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. 
One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, 
each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for 
the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 
60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.

This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in 
the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which 
itself is another dimension.

[Vo]:UDH, wimps, and dark matter

[JonesBeene]

Recently there have been a flurry of News articles about the lack of success in 
finding DM - but the favored candidate is still the WIMP

AFAIK there is no satisfactory definition for WIMPS {after all they are dark 
and hard to observe} other than

1) Weakly interacting to an extreme but massive
2) Mass-energy of between 50 and 100 GeV fits into current theory
3) Suspiciously close to the Higgs in mass and other features

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles

Since they are weakly interacting to a spectacular degree, they could and 
probably do exist primarily in another dimension or as part of the Higgs field. 
One possible decay channel would be for the Higgs boson to decay to two WIMPs, 
each having a rest mass energy of half of the 126 GeV Higgs or about 63 GeV for 
the WIMP. A putative buckyball of UDH would have about the same mass equal to 
60 atoms of UDH as in the carbon model.

This is the candidate for WIMPS not yet considered – and in effect it is UDH in 
the form of a bound H60 buckyball – perhaps hidden in the Higgs field which 
itself is another dimension.