In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:38:51
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Here's a closeup of the Steorn test rig. It is unclear whether it
includes the actual overunity device:
http://www.geocities.com/terry1094/Steorn_test_rig.jpg
Now if only it were a movie, with the rig on a glass
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, John Berry wrote:
Maybe you missed the part where they have useful patented security
technology?
Do you really think that running a scam is a good way to get your current
technology picked up?
And for that matter their careers as scientists and or designers would be
In reply to William Beaty's message of Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:36:37
-0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
It *could* be entirely real.Until more information comes in, the true
status is somewhere between scam and genuine and measurement error
(on a 3-axis graph!)
[snip]
Given that they claim to already have a
On 8/28/06, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that they claim to already have a device that not only
self-sustains, but puts out excess power to boot, I think
measurement error is already ruled out. IOW it's either a scam, or
it's real.
Here's a closeup of the Steorn test
On 8/28/06, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a closeup of the Steorn test rig. It is unclear whether it
includes the actual overunity device:
http://www.geocities.com/terry1094/Steorn_test_rig.jpg
Sean McCarthy was on FoxNews:
http://www.foxnews.com/cavuto/
Click on Endless
On 8/26/06, John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are indicators against this being a scam though,
Not a scam; but, a well chiseled lead-in to the next season of Lost.
Do you remember the magnetic effect in the last episode? eg
Terry
William Beaty wrote:
But maybe Jed is right, and these people are just incompetent. I vote for
fraud, since incompetence usually has different earmarks. Here's the
scam-detector list I put up on my site:
Free Energy links, scams
http://amasci.com/freenrg/fnrg.html
I agree. The
There are indicators against this being a scam though, first the fact that they have already patented useful (security) technology, have millions of dollars, investors and if they are shown as pulling off a scam they will be totally sunk.(scammers would be unlikely to put so much on the line, well
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, John Berry wrote:
There are indicators against this being a scam though, first the fact that
they have already patented useful (security) technology, have millions of
dollars, investors and if they are shown as pulling off a scam they will be
totally sunk.
Why?
If the
On 8/27/06, William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, John Berry wrote: There are indicators against this being a scam though, first the fact that they have already patented useful (security) technology, have millions of dollars, investors and if they are shown as pulling off a
I think it's www.steorn.net
On 8/18/06, Zell, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's www.steorn.net
Yeah, it made Reuters:
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=scienceNewsstoryID=2006-08-17T231302Z_01_L17772156_RTRUKOC_0_US-TECHNOLOGY-ENERGY.xmlWTmodLoc=NewsHome-C3-scienceNews-2
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 8/18/06, Zell, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's www.steorn.net
Yeah, it made Reuters:
This is very sad. I do not understand the mindset of inventors who do
this kind of thing, and say, . . . until this thing is validated by
science we won't be doing
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 8/18/06, Zell, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's www.steorn.net
Yeah, it made Reuters:
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=scienceNewsstoryID=2006-0
8-17T231302Z_01_L17772156_RTRUKOC_0_US-TECHNOLOGY-ENERGY.xmlWTmodLoc=NewsHome
On 8/18/06, Zell, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's www.steorn.net
Grimer is still on the international filter list.
--- Grimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:48:32 +0100
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Grimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Steorn.net
15 matches
Mail list logo
