bject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device -- Third
paper
The super-atom produced as a large collection of coherent and entangled
particles can completely lowers the Coulomb barrier. This is how atomic
clustering fits into the LENR+ process.
see
www.iscmns.org/w
; of the barrier. I have to ask where the additional energy comes from to
>>> satisfy the actual energy needed? If it is taken from other particles that
>>> might make sense, otherwise it sounds like a free lunch.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>> -Original Mes
gt; occurs, all of the borrowed energy would of course be paid back. The net
> effect is the same, but then there would be no free lunch.
>
> Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 12:48 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis o
12:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device -- Third
paper
If you can think of the coulomb barrier as a soldier, a very good and strong
one, this hero, can defeat any individual soldier of the opposing army. Even if
the opposing army attacks our hero one
is hard to know what to make of this. It says the Coulomb barrier
>>>> drops away to low levels under conditions we can in principle control. If
>>>> true, that would be ... big.
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it be amusing if the "uncontrolled varia
e amusing if the "uncontrolled variable" that accounts
>>> for variation of results over the last 23 years turned out to be the RFI
>>> background in the vicinity of the experiment?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM,
gt; true, that would be ... big.
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be amusing if the "uncontrolled variable" that accounts for
>>> variation of results over the last 23 years turned out to be the RFI
>>> background in the vicinity of the experim
s like a free lunch.
>
> Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:20 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device --
> Third paper
>
> The super-atom produced as a large collection of coher
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:20 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device -- Third
paper
The super-atom produced as a large collection of coherent and entangled
particles can completely lowers the Coulomb barrier. This
.com/content/rup025083t105q83/
>>>>
>>>> It is hard to know what to make of this. It says the Coulomb barrier
>>>> drops away to low levels under conditions we can in principle control. If
>>>> true, that would be ... big.
>>>>
>>>
be ... big.
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be amusing if the "uncontrolled variable" that accounts for
>>> variation of results over the last 23 years turned out to be the RFI
>>> background in the vicinity of the experiment?
>>>
>>> Jeff
t;>
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
>>
>>> > From: "Jeff Berkowitz"
>>> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM
>>> > Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device
>>> > If you open
ccounts for
> variation of results over the last 23 years turned out to be the RFI
> background in the vicinity of the experiment?
>
> Jeff
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
>
>> > From: "Jeff Berkowitz"
>> > Sent: Satur
In reply to Alan Fletcher's message of Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:08:43 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>> From: "Jeff Berkowitz"
>> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM
>> Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device
>> If you open thi
the vicinity of the experiment?
Jeff
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> > From: "Jeff Berkowitz"
> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM
> > Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device
> > If you open this lin
> From: "Jeff Berkowitz"
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM
> Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device
> If you open this link:
> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulated-LENR-Paper.pdf
>
&g
The problem is Rossi :D
2012/8/19 Jeff Berkowitz
> right, the author has nothing nice to say about W-L.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
>> Better save it before Krivit purges that!
>>
>>
>> 2012/8/19 Jeff Berkowitz
>>
>>> If you open this link:
>>>
>>> http://newe
right, the author has nothing nice to say about W-L.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> Better save it before Krivit purges that!
>
>
> 2012/8/19 Jeff Berkowitz
>
>> If you open this link:
>>
>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulat
Better save it before Krivit purges that!
2012/8/19 Jeff Berkowitz
> If you open this link:
>
> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulated-LENR-Paper.pdf
>
> It turns out that the PDF contains three separate and unrelated LENR
> papers stuck together end to
If you open this link:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulated-LENR-Paper.pdf
It turns out that the PDF contains three separate and unrelated LENR papers
stuck together end to end.
The second of the three papers is analysis of the applicability of W-L to
20 matches
Mail list logo
