Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Your view of history is completely distorted.
The first person whose home blazed with electric light was J.P. Morgan,
the man who really ran America.
As far as I know, the first person who home blazed with electric light was
Thomas Edison, when his living
Let me add that Axil is confused about Christensen's claim. Christensen
does not say that small companies use disruptive technology to challenge
large ones. He says nothing about the size or political power of the
challenger. Sometimes small companies take business from large ones;
sometime large
Mason, check this map out.
http://www.mindmeister.com/64849892/tabletop-fusion-discovered
Ruby
On 8/30/13 2:08 PM, Mason Ainsworth wrote:
QUESTIONS
1. Which Players are impacted and How are they impacted?
2. What are the reasonable possible responses to LENR for each Player (or
category of
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*A development approach that may be more compatible with the way things are
today are to orient the reactor design to the needs of the grid and the
various utility companies.*
This strategy makes no sense to me. None at all! Plus it would not work
because
I became a LENR believer on June 6th after reading Mark Gibb's 5/20/13
article about E-Cat 3rd Party Testing.
Not a very rational way to start a discussion. Belief has its place,
but only in a limited way.
What's needed is a way to close the credibility gap between LENR and LENR+.
That
Your view of history is completely distorted.
The first person whose home blazed with electric light was J.P. Morgan, the
man who really ran America.. The financier also owned the first business
lit with incandescent bulbs. In the latter case, Thomas Edison himself was
on hand to flip the switch.
Good Day to All.
I became a LENR believer on June 6th after reading Mark Gibb's 5/20/13 article
about E-Cat 3rd Party Testing. I then googled LENR for more reading. The core
of my understanding is encompassed by LENRProof.com; I have followed 90-95% of
LENRPRoof's links. As a result, I set
sorry jed to quote you, just in case you forget old discussion.
to imagine the future Jed booklet :
Cold fusion and the future is an interesting start, not only for the
vision, but for the methods
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusiona.pdf
this discussion is also full of experience
*I first must disclaim this opinion as I having no business sense or
experience to back it up, outside of some nuclear reactor design thinking,
but here it goes anyway.*
**
*Both current successful developers of the Ni/H reactor are good people
having solid humanitarian, egalitarian, and
9 matches
Mail list logo
