Abd wrote:
You are, however, assuming that Galantini could tell that the chimney had no
liquid water in it at
the level of the thermometer, because he withdrew the probe and observed that
it was dry.
[deleted sentence]
Has it occurred to you that steam doesn't come out of the thermometer port
Mark Iverson wrote:
1) In Galantini's report, it is clear that he was looking at several different
sensors.
2) I seriously doubt that the RH sensor would physically fit in the opening
where the outlet
temperature sensor is located.
It fits in a different port. You can see it in some of the
At 10:04 AM 8/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Essentially, depending on the thermometer being wet to inform the
observer of the lack of water is foolish.
No, it isn't. Galantini knows what he is doing. The probe would be
wet because these probes are tapered. The plug
At 10:38 AM 8/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mark Iverson wrote:
1) In Galantini's report, it is clear that he was looking at
several different sensors.
2) I seriously doubt that the RH sensor would physically fit in the
opening where the outlet
temperature sensor is located.
It fits in a
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
With some tests of the eCat we can rule this out. It seems unlikely to me
that it works in some tests but not others.
When we don't have prior experience, we have no basis for prediction.
You are multiplying entities unnecessarily. The
2011/8/9 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Since Rossi was able to keep the thing from overflowing when Galantini
observed the tests, why do you think he was unable to do this when Krivit
was watching the test?
When Galantini observed the test, they had large version of E-Cat that
can store
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
When Galantini observed the test, they had large version of E-Cat that
can store large quantities, perhaps several liters of water, before it
starts overflowing.
When I am cooking, I can stop a pot from boiling dry whether it is large or
small.
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
And if we look Rossi's presentation when he did calculations he
treated Krivit's audience like he would assume that Krivit was
doing journalism to some tabloid news paper(!).
That is nonsense. The calculations were perfectly correct. They were
2011/8/9 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
This also means that ictu oculi is very unreliable
way to make reliable confirmation.
He withdrew the probe and looked at it. It was dry. It would wet if there
was water flowing through the machine.
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
I guess, you missed my point. When Galantini observed ictu oculi, the
E-Cat was not yet overflowing, because it may take several tens of
minutes if not hours before water level rises enough to start
overflowing . .
Ah. I see what you mean. However, he says he checked
2011/8/9 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
I do not think it overflows, but even if it does, that does not preclude
real heat. I suppose it would reduce the amount of heat, as Abd says. It
would also prevent steam from coming out of the end of the hose, as Storms
says. Therefore I doubt it
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyways, I see that it is absolutely impossible for Rossi to control
anomalous cold fusion reaction so that it would match exactly with the
water inflow rate, because I think that even 5% variation in heat
output would cause drastic change of steam
extraordinarily weak.
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Multiplying entities: why would Rossi fake some tests when
others are indisputably real?
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
I
At 10:01 AM 8/9/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The overflowing water hypothesis does not apply to the flowing
water test, and it is definitely wrong for the tests observed by
Galantini. He removed the probe and observed that it was dry. So
Rossi can control the water level in the cell and keep it
At 01:47 PM 8/9/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jouni Valkonen
mailto:jounivalko...@gmail.comjounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
And if we look Rossi's presentation when he did calculations he
treated Krivit's audience like he would assume that Krivit was doing
journalism to some tabloid news paper(!).
At 01:39 PM 8/9/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jouni Valkonen
mailto:jounivalko...@gmail.comjounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
When Galantini observed the test, they had large version of E-Cat that
can store large quantities, perhaps several liters of water, before it
starts overflowing.
When I am
16 matches
Mail list logo
