- Original Message
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, February 25, 2010 12:25:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's improved generator
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Are we watching the same video? ;-)
Did
On Feb 25, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, February 25, 2010 12:25:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's improved generator
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Harry Veeder wrote
- Original Message
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 8:52:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's improved generator
On Feb 25, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message
From
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The controller is powered by DC. He measures voltage and current going
into into the controller. The controller converts this to electrical
pulses which feed the toroidal coil, so don't these measurements
give you an upper bound on the input
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:58 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
wrote:
From: Horace:
...
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC input , yet there is no
effort made
Has Naudin just made his transformer more efficient...or is it really a
generator?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xS6Fknxv18
Harry
__
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot
with
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Has Naudin just made his transformer more efficient...or is it
really a generator?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xS6Fknxv18
Harry
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC
A variation. Pulse in primaries P1 or P2 cuts permanent B through
secondaries S1 or S2.
inline: sketch.jpg
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
From: Horace:
...
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC input , yet there is no
effort made to measure input power, only current. It would make more
sense to get the I and V traces for the input coil.
It pretty obvious
A silly variation, but closer in nature.
inline: 100_2469.jpg
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:58 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From: Horace:
...
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC input , yet there is no
effort made to measure input power, only current. It would make more
inline: 100_2470.jpg
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
100_2470.JPG
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:58 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From: Horace:
...
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC input , yet there is no
effort made to measure input power, only current.
The above should
- Original Message
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, February 24, 2010 9:30:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's improved generator
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Has Naudin just made his transformer more
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, February 24, 2010 9:30:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's improved generator
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Has
15 matches
Mail list logo
