More rossi-sez :
Brian
March 29th, 2013 at 9:02 AM
Dear Mr. Rossi
I hope that you are well.
I was curious about the timeline for the publication of the third party
report. It is my understanding that publication in a peer reviewed
journal is a very long process, often taking a year between
and we can all
celebrate. I hope the wait is not too long this time.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Mar 29, 2013 4:40 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi says third party tests concluded
More rossi-sez :
Brian
March 29th
At 01:46 PM 3/29/2013, David Roberson wrote:
I wish
he would cease the nonsense about snakes, clowns and other irrelevant
subjects.
Since he got hooked on the publicity he would love to spill the beans,
but can't because of patents, nda's and the like.
So he spills it -- in response to
Rossi wrote:
1. Andrea Rossi
March 25th, 2013 at 8:13
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=791cpage=4#comment-664056
Dear Robert Tanhaus:
1- no, we revolutioned the technology separating the activation from
the E-Cat, making 2 separated apparatuses in the same
What could mean a 2 stages eCat ?
Is Rossi able to make different flavors of its magical powder ?
One powder with low temp start but with slow kinetic (Low kW),
called by Rossi the mouse
One powder with high temp start but with fast kinetic (High kW),
called by Rossi the cat
This
of the
repeatability issues are due to a self destructive geometry that wears faster
with output levels.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi says third party
Akira: Do you know who Prometeon is? (The organization that issued this
announcement.) Did they do the tests? Will they issue a report?
Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Prometon s.r.l issued a related press release (in Italian):
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Comunicato_stampa_Prometeon_25_3_2013.pdf
On 03/26/2013 03:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Akira: Do you know who Prometeon is? (The organization that issued
this announcement.) Did they do the tests? Will they issue a report?
They are the sole authorized E-Cat reseller/licensee for Italy
I don't know if they will issue reports. Apparently
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X [mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com]
Sent: mardi 26 mars 2013 15:47
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi says third party tests concluded
Arnaud,
He might be zeroing in on a method to prevent the self destruction but
still get
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
They are the sole authorized E-Cat reseller/licensee for Italy
I don't know if they will issue reports. Apparently they have made tests
on working E-Cat devices over the past months but they are not related to
the upcoming third party
At 10:20 AM 3/26/2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
They are the sole authorized E-Cat reseller/licensee for Italy
I don't know if they will issue reports. Apparently they have made
tests on working E-Cat devices over the past months but they are not
controls subtlety each NAE.
Arnaud
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X [mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com]
Sent: mardi 26 mars 2013 15:47
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi says third party tests concluded
Arnaud,
He might be zeroing
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
The prometheon release just sounded like a rehash of ROSSI'S ANNOUNCEMENT.
I didn't see anything new.
I assume that Rossi and Prometheon are working together, and coordinating,
so naturally they say the same thing. You would not expect anything new. Or
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=791#comments
Andrea Rossi
March 24th, 2013 at 10:53 PM
DEAR GEORGEHANTS:
YOUR COMMENT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE OPENS THE GATE FOR THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
THE TESTS OF THE THIRD INDIPENDENT PARTY HAVE BEEN COMPLETED YESTERDAY.
I DID NOT ATTEND,
He takes risks. No report within 1 month, he will lose even his core fans.
The report will be inconclusive and/or written by
unknown professors even worse.
BTW, have you noticed how silent is the ShutdownRossi site recently?
Peter
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Harry Veeder
” WE GOT EVIDENCE THAT
THE ‘ EFFECT’ IS REAL BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT”.
does not sound very encouraging in terms of CoP of the HCat. If it
took this long to come to that conclusion, the performance must be
low.
I don't see any trouble with that
2013/3/25 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
” WE GOT EVIDENCE THAT
THE ‘ EFFECT’ IS REAL BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT”.
does not sound very encouraging in terms of CoP of the HCat. If it
took this long to come to that conclusion, the performance must be
I hope the output is at least as powerful as the two years of hot air
expelled discussing it
On Monday, March 25, 2013, Terry Blanton wrote:
” WE GOT EVIDENCE THAT
THE ‘ EFFECT’ IS REAL BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT”.
does not sound very encouraging in terms of CoP of the HCat. If it
took
On 03/25/2013 09:35 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
” WE GOT EVIDENCE THAT
THE ‘ EFFECT’ IS REAL BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT”.
does not sound very encouraging in terms of CoP of the HCat. If it
took this long to come to that conclusion, the performance must be
low.
I don't share that conclusion.
Terry Blanton wrote:
” WE GOT EVIDENCE THAT
THE ‘ EFFECT’ IS REAL BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT”.
does not sound very encouraging in terms of CoP of the HCat. If it
took this long to come to that conclusion, the performance must be
low.
I don't see why.
In my experience, it takes
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Andre Blum andre_vor...@blums.nl wrote:
First: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and all that.
I hate that aphorism! I really hate it. Here is what Melich and I wrote
about it, in response to the
e-catworld has this update.
UPDATE: Rossi reports that one of the testers told him: ” ” What we have
seen is too important, must absolutely be published”. Also, in reference
to the new design of the hot cat, he states: “Basically, we have no more
a reactor or a cluster of reactors, but each
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Sagan's statement clearly places him in the pre-Enlightenment mode of
natural science: A priest.
Amen. Also the way he said millions and MIIONS.
- Jed
Rossi talks about charge. The activator could be a charge amplifier.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:27 PM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
e-catworld has this update.
UPDATE: Rossi reports that one of the testers told him: ” ” What we have
seen is too important, must absolutely be
Sometimes, I think Rossi is like the beggar in this Hanukkah story of
Bone Button Borscht.
You can listen to the story here.
http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=2178798097
It starts at the 5:30 mark.
Harry
third party tests concluded
” WE GOT EVIDENCE THAT
THE ‘ EFFECT’ IS REAL BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT”.
does not sound very encouraging in terms of CoP of the HCat. If it
took this long to come to that conclusion, the performance must be
low.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:10 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I does sound that way doesn't it? Anyone want to make a guess as to what
the report will say?
I will start with a COP of 4.
13.72 (◕‿◕)
I make no predictions about the specifics of this report. But I do predict
three things:
1. It will be positive, as he claims. What possible benefit would he derive
from lying about this? As soon as the report comes out people would see he
is lying.
2. It will be published sooner or later.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
He takes risks. No report within 1 month, he will lose even his core fans.
The report will be inconclusive and/or written by
unknown professors even worse.
BTW, have you noticed how silent is the ShutdownRossi site
Peter Gluck apparently wrote:
He takes risks. No report within 1 month, he will lose even his core
fans.
The report will be inconclusive and/or written by
unknown professors even worse.
I didn't get that message.
I am not sure who the core fans would be. I guess all these people who
As 22 passi writes, if this is false (or made up) this will be proof of
crazyness. There are some limits to everything. My worries are about the
quality of the report.
Peter
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Peter Gluck apparently wrote:
He takes
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
As 22 passi writes, if this is false (or made up) this will be proof of
crazyness. There are some limits to everything.
Good point. I guess it is one thing to announce vague grand plans to make
200,000 reactors a year. No one takes the grand plans
On 2013-03-25 08:01, Harry Veeder wrote:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=791#comments
Andrea Rossi
March 24th, 2013 at 10:53 PM
Prometon s.r.l issued a related press release (in Italian):
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Comunicato_stampa_Prometeon_25_3_2013.pdf
Cheers,
S.A.
On 03/25/2013 08:07 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Prometon s.r.l issued a related press release (in Italian):
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Comunicato_stampa_Prometeon_25_3_2013.pdf
Here's the Google translation:
BOLOGNA. Completed the day before the test VALIDATION
and the Hot Cat by
Axil,
It looks like my speculation may be right. Rossi writes:
1.
Andrea Rossi
March 25th, 2013 at 8:13 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=791cpage=4#comment-664056
Dear Robert Tanhaus:
1- no, we revolutioned the technology separating the activation from
the
35 matches
Mail list logo
