On May 31, 2009, at 11:56 AM, grok wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
It seems to me also true the probability of mating itself may
change due
to mutations, and this is a
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
This discussion is somewhat re-discovering or describing Dewey B. Larson's
Reciprocal System of physics, a unified theory:
http://rstheory.org/video/rs-101
Hi,
I've seen the introductory video, read some articles related to Dewey
Larson's theory, and found some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
It seems to me also true the probability of mating itself may change due
to mutations, and this is a form of of natural selection. The gradual
On May 24, 2009, at 2:07 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 24 May 2009 01:03:41
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
The distinguishing characteristic is the inability to mate with
the parents, or at least with some of the animals the parents can
mate with, which can
its not just genetic inability to mate. its also social. For example,
bobcats will and still sometimes DO sucessfully mate with housecats
with non mule offspring. but they generally do not, from a social
standpoint. Darwins finches that speciated apart did so in large part
not because of genetics,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
Mud stabbing bug eaters just never associated with
wide billed nutcrackers.
Didn't they play each other in the World Series a few decades back?
Terry
For a fresh scientific angle on the numerous inconsistencies in Darwinism:
http://www.panspermia.com
On May 23, 2009, at 9:12 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 22 May 2009 17:37:22
-0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Which comes first - the chicken or the egg?
The egg came first. It was laid by a non-chicken who was so dumb
that it didn't
even realize that
grok wrote:
As the smoke cleared, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
mounted the barricade and roared out:
The problem with so called time dimensions, is that they lack
underlying physical reality. Time does not exist as such, at the
physical level; that is, there's nothing inherently real in
Epigenetics crosses multiple generations. It may play a significant
role in what makes a chicken a chicken. The chicken is more than its
DNA. The chicken may in significant part be the egg, and the
mother's egg, etc.
http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/821
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 24 May 2009 01:03:41 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
The distinguishing characteristic is the inability to mate with
the parents, or at least with some of the animals the parents can
mate with, which can be due to a genetic characteristic that does not
Horace Heffner wrote:
Epigenetics crosses multiple generations. It may play a significant
role in what makes a chicken a chicken. The chicken is more than its
DNA. The chicken may in significant part be the egg, and the
mother's egg, etc.
Hi All, 5-23-09
Time, like truth, is subjective; it is a feeling
about something. In terms of natural selection,
it is to our advantage to be able to predict
what is going to happen; and time is a series of
events, heart beats or sunrises, that lets us
keep track of things.
Jack Smith
, we're grasping at straws, so to speak,
when doing that.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Zitter and ZPE
Velocity does not need to be measured to exist. I'm talking about the
intrinsic
Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Hi All, 5-23-09
Time, like truth, is subjective; it is a feeling
about something. In terms of natural selection,
it is to our advantage to be able to predict
what is going to happen; and time is a series of
events, heart beats or sunrises, that lets us
keep
Mauro,
Although I do not completely disagree with anything you say, you still have
not made a good case for the assertion that velocity (motion) is more
basic, as an underlying measurement standard - or prime-variable, than is
time.
In every case you site, you are in effect eliminating
Jones Beene wrote:
Mauro,
Although I do not completely disagree with anything you say, you still have
not made a good case for the assertion that velocity (motion) is more
basic, as an underlying measurement standard - or prime-variable, than is
time.
In every case you site, you are in
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
The furthest implications are that you have no right in physics,
epistemologically speaking, to talk about relative time scales, or which is
the same, time dimensions.
I believe your argument would be negated by successful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
mounted the barricade and roared out:
The problem with so called time dimensions, is that they lack
underlying physical reality. Time does not exist as such, at the
physical level; that is,
...@lacy.com.ar]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Zitter and ZPE
Jones Beene wrote:
- Original Message
From: Mauro Lacy
Only velocity exists, physically. From then on, time is derived as t=v/s.
That is, in physics time is no more than a mathematical
Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
The furthest implications are that you have no right in physics,
epistemologically speaking, to talk about relative time scales, or which is
the same, time dimensions.
I believe your
dimensions 3 ( which I
think are mostly bogus, BTW ).
Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale Arizona US
http://HoytStearns.com
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy [mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Zitter and ZPE
Jones
On May 23, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
wrote:
The furthest implications are that you have no right in physics,
epistemologically speaking, to talk about relative time scales, or
which is
the same, time dimensions.
What I find most interesting is that it is funded by people who know
no physics but want to physically know.
Terry
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
On May 23, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Mauro Lacy
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 22 May 2009 17:37:22 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Which comes first - the chicken or the egg?
The egg came first. It was laid by a non-chicken who was so dumb that it didn't
even realize that what came out of the egg was a different species, and looked
after
All this talk about ESP and its possible scientific basis -- got me thinking
about the z-word once again. Not to mention how hard it is to separate the
pursuit of free energy from less divine pursuits (depending on one's
z-orientation, of course)
Caveat: Lethal Text follows... meaning that it
Jones Beene wrote:
All this talk about ESP and its possible scientific basis -- got me
thinking about the “z-word” once again. Not to mention how hard it is
to separate the pursuit of free energy from less divine pursuits
(depending on one’s z-orientation, of course)
Caveat: Lethal Text
Reminds me of my thoughts the first time I was introduced to
superstring theory. the expanding contracting strings sure sounded
to me as the 3 from 4 dimensional equivilant to cutting a chord across
a 3 dimensional wave form, and as the wave moves, getting shrinking
and contracting lines on your
On May 22, 2009, at 9:26 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly
what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly
disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and
inexplicable. There is another theory which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
There is a certain sense in which I would say the universe has a
purpose. It's not there just somehow by chance. Some people take the
view that the
Jones Beene wrote:
All this talk about ESP and its possible scientific basis -- got me
thinking about the “z-word” once again. Not to mention how hard it is
to separate the pursuit of free energy from less divine pursuits
(depending on one’s z-orientation, of course)
Caveat: Lethal Text
-Original Message-
Terry Blanton wrote:
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly
what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly
disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and
inexplicable. There is another theory which states
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy
Elaborating further: In a framework like the one I propose
before(particle rotation along a fourth dimensional axis), gravity can
be explained as no more than gentle variations of this second spin of
elementary particles (I think that we can call it
Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy
Elaborating further: In a framework like the one I propose
before(particle rotation along a fourth dimensional axis), gravity can
be explained as no more than gentle variations of this second spin of
elementary particles (I
On May 22, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
BTW One special case of lunacy (the coin problem) is sometimes
referred to
as McNugget numbers. A McNugget number is the total number of
McDonald's
Chicken McNuggets in any number of boxes. The original boxes (prior
to the
introduction of
Mauro Lacy wrote:
Only velocity exists, physically. From then on, time is derived as
t=v/s. That is, in physics time is no more than a mathematical construct.
I meant: t=s/v
- Original Message
From: Mauro Lacy
Only velocity exists, physically. From then on, time is derived as t=v/s.
That is, in physics time is no more than a mathematical construct. I meant:
t=s/v
Which comes first - the chicken or the egg?
Why not say that only time and space
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Which comes first - the chicken or the egg?
I love this question because it solely depends on whether you are a
believer in ID or evolution. Those followers if Intelligent Design
would say that YHWH made the chicken
On May 22, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
wrote:
Which comes first - the chicken or the egg?
I love this question because it solely depends on whether you are a
believer in ID or evolution. Those followers if
Jones Beene wrote:
- Original Message
From: Mauro Lacy
Only velocity exists, physically. From then on, time is derived as t=v/s.
That is, in physics time is no more than a mathematical construct. I meant:
t=s/v
Which comes first - the chicken or the egg?
You mean the general phenomena of 'motion' rather than velocity.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Zitter and ZPE
Velocity does not need to be measured to exist. I'm talking about the
intrinsic
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:31 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Zitter and ZPE
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
wrote:
Which comes first - the chicken or the egg?
I love this question because
42 matches
Mail list logo
