Jed
Here the flow meter
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0LCgn_05ZGY/TWGehaAfm-I/E5w/Ew3nHhdHUDQ/s1600/E-Cat110211.jpg
It's a simple house utility water meter like this
Susan Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Here the flow meter
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0LCgn_05ZGY/TWGehaAfm-I/E5w/Ew3nHhdHUDQ/s1600/E-Cat110211.jpg
It's a simple house utility water meter like this
Thanks. They said it was an ordinary utility meter. Why did you put the word
flow
My dear friends,
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/08/anticipating-1mw-demo.html
and I ask you to take in consideration what I am asking there. It can
be useful to find out e.g. how will this demo be better thank the
experiments
done with individual E-cats.
Thank you!
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
It is kind of sad that Levi refuses to admit that he did poor
measurements with steam tests . . .
1. He does not think he did poor tests; neither do I; and neither does any
expert I have heard from. People here who know little about calorimetry
I wrote:
I believe I saw a longer one somewhere. Will ask Lewan.
I stand corrected. Lewan said he has no videos of steam longer than this.
Here is his entire response, with permission:
Jed,
I only observed the tube held upright once and did not study it carefully.
There did come some water
Again, if you write “7 l/h flow” you are talking about the test done in june,
with Krivit.
In june, there wan’t a weight scale, only a “Rossi said” that he controlled the
flow by weighting it. But is a “Rossi said”.
What we really know is the pump used, an LMI P18, and we know that the maximum
How do you know that 1 stroke = 1 click?
There were no unexplained power peaks, except for the first one. So your
statement is hypothetical. It is also extremely unlikely for the following
reasons:
Jed have you had any a chance to live in Italy for some time ?
The test location is just in the middle of an industrial area.
- At any time
2. Apart from the initial heat burst, the temperature was steady, as shown
in the laptop photos they took. So the flow must have been steady.
You have a terrible confusion in your head.
The “laptop photos” doesn’t exists at all for the february test (liquid water
calorimetry)
From: Jed Rothwell
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Apart from the initial heat burst, the temperature was steady, as
shown
in the laptop photos they took. So the flow must have been steady.
You have a terrible confusion in your head.
The “laptop photos” doesn’t exists at all for the february
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, if you write “7 l/h flow” you are talking about the test done in
june, with Krivit.
In june, there wan’t a weight scale . . .
That is not clear. There may have been one. In any case, this same argument
about how the pump works has been
Again, you wrote that “the temperature was steady, as shown in the laptop
photos they took”.
These photos are not pubblicated. So there isn’t “as show”, it’s again a
“RossiLevi said”.
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 8:25 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: I
Quite simply, 1MW demo will show commersially ready prototype. Single
modules that were thusfar shown, were just lab prototypes. And also there
will be also single self-sustaining module tested for accurate calorimetry
in October.
Was this approach right or wrong, it can be debated. I think that
Susan Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed have you had any a chance to live in Italy for some time ?
The test location is just in the middle of an industrial area.
- At any time any business facility around could have drown an abnormal
water consumption (there is a car wash nearby)
At this
Good ideas Jouni!
Do you have some scheme imagined for how will the 330
generators linked and how the global parameters will be measured?
Peter
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
Quite simply, 1MW demo will show commersially ready prototype. Single
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Again, you wrote that “the temperature was steady, as shown in the
laptop photos they took”.
These photos are not pubblicated. So there isn’t “as show”, it’s again
a “RossiLevi said”.
It would be easy to make fake photos or a fake video. So even if they
published photos,
I think that 1MW plant will just sit there and generates the steam. But that
single module test is where accurate calorimetry is done and also where
hidden wires and hidden chemical energy sources are excluded.
That is, scientific validation will be done with single module and 1MW plant
is there
I do not like to be argumentative. Perhaps I misunderstand Abd's argument
here. But it seems to me he repeatedly claimed that in order to measure a
mysterious source of heat from an unknown phonomenon, you must have
detailed, time-sequenced data. It is not enough to have one number. Even if
the
Sorry. I meant to say measuring the UFO speed does NOT call for modern
methods, or photography. George Washington, who was well trained in
surveying, could have done it with ease. (I suppose that training and
tramping around in the wilderness surveying property must have proved
invaluable to him
You can't argue with a weight scale and a clock
Yeah. There is a problem: in Lewan’s test, where the flow was accurately
measured by an independent observer (Lewan), the noise from the pump is
consistent with the water flow written inside the report.
But in June, when the water flow is another
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. There is a problem: in Lewan’s test, where the flow was accurately
measured by an independent observer (Lewan), the noise from the pump is
consistent with the water flow written inside the report.
Which report by Lewan do you refer to? What
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Was this approach right or wrong, it can be debated. I think that it was
just wrong approach.
I agree. Plus I think a test of a 1 MW reactor is fraught with difficulties.
It is much easier to test 1 to 10 kW.
In my opinnion Rossi should have
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece (with a
video done for the 28 april test)
Report of 28 april:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3166569.ece/BINARY/Report+test+of+E-cat+28+April+2011.pdf
As you can hear, the stroke frequency is around 32 strokes/minute,
I wrote:
Scientific instruments and techniques hundreds of years old can measure
temperature, the speed of an object, the speed of light and many other
important values with as much confidence as the best technology can today;
albeit with far less precision.
Note that the speed of light
The computations in the following pdfs are provided in order to
hopefully permit more meaningful discussion or understanding of the
percolator effect as it relates to Rossi type devices and simulators:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/KrivitFilm.pdf
25 matches
Mail list logo
