One thing your theory does not seem to cover is why the original Proton +
Proton fusion happened in the first place. On the sun, it's because there's so
much gravity holding the protons together. In a lattice, presumably it's due
to the metallic atoms caging the protons close enough together
Conservation of energy is a strong theory, so widely confirmed that
questioning it must occur at the fringes, i.e., energy is not
necessarily conserved locally under quantum conditions, but these
variations average out so that it remains conserved at the macroscopic level.
Absent evidence
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
--- On Tue, 9/4/12, fznidar...@aol.com fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
From: fznidar...@aol.com fznidar...@aol.com
Subject: [Vo]:spoke to soon
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2012,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
If the motor goes through a cycle, energy can oscillate between potential
and kinetic, but there is no energy gain at any point. If there appears to
be, long experience indicates that there is some hidden
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
For example, there is potential energy stored in a permanent magnet, in
the magnetisation.
This is one of the quantities that must be entered into the arithmetic I
originally requested of the system cited in the
On Sep 5, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
For example, there is potential energy stored in a permanent magnet, in the
magnetisation.
...
The magnets, however, will lose their magnetization and the motor will run
down.
This is untrue. There is no such
Jed Rothwell just posted ILENRS-12 presentations at:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1097
Brian Ahern's presentation Energy Localization proposes that Fermi
acceleration (F-A) can intensely concentrate energy on the nanoscale.
His example of spring coupled point masses seems to
I think the question of energy stored in a permanent magnet is a redherring.
Replace the permanent magnet by a spring. The spring will lose its
springiness over time as it is repeatedly compressed. Do we say this
is because spring energy is being used up?
Harry
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:41 PM,
Lou,
I am ok with the concept you mention [snip] As in endothermic chemical
reactions, this is (probably) just an apparent
violation of the 2nd Law, except occurring at nuclear/particle scales.[/snip]
So like other environmental theories the energy density is simply segregated
An easy test to prove that the energy is not stored in the top magnet is to
hold the device while it slowly rotates in your hand. Locate the point where
the torque is minimum and let it go. Be careful to ensure that the upper
magnet is not at the top of the fixture at the release point.
I
Fran,
I would not be surprised if Ahern's energy concentrating mechanism appears
in many guises, but is normally so transient and elusive that its
existence is doubted. The same math describes seemingly different
phenomena.
-- LP
Roarty, Francis X wrote:
Lou,
I am ok with the concept
OK since no arithmetic seems plausible, what about actually obtaining the
device in question and running the obvious test: Let it run for a very
very long time?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
An easy test to prove that the energy is not stored in the
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
We know of one exception to the conservation of energy, which involves the
interchangeability of mass and energy. So the ultimate principle is
conservation of mass/energy. However, mass conversion is very much out of
the ordinary, and is highly
Some of these presentations are a little . . . odd. Such as:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PopaSimilLroadmaptof.pdf
Regarding this one:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FrenchDpatentsanda.pdf
. . . my wife thought that slide #5, page 14, showing the angel is
unbecoming of an academic web site.
On Sep 5, 2012, at 9:18 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
OK since no arithmetic seems plausible, what about actually obtaining the
device in question and running the obvious test: Let it run for a very very
long time?
Easy test would be to construct three identical perpetual
Perhaps the energy is stored in the field?
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/engfie.html
As an example, an ignition coil (a step-up transformer) on a car is
energized with 12V, and draws a steady current, which generates a magnetic
field around the coil. When the current is
Yes, that would be another test to reveal whether or not it is actually a
perpetual motion device. I was looking for a test that would be quick, and
easy. All you would need to do is see if the machine rotates at the speed
shown in the video. The rate of rotation depends upon the amount of
I have seen many instances where the instantaneous value of a noisy system can
be many times larger than the average or RMS. Thermal noise is a perfect
example. I suspect that rogue ocean waves are in this category. The amount of
time during which the extreme amplitude excursion occurs
Hello Kevin – very perceptive about solar gravity, and of course as to this
factor being the most difficult property to simulate on Earth, in an effort to
frame a working hypothesis for P+P which is similar to the solar model.
This subject of “effective pressure” leads to the Casimir
The paper by David French about patents is good. I now know a lot more
about patents thanks to this, and his lectures. (Granted, I knew
practically nothing before.)
- Jed
It would be easier to reduce the stored potential energy before the device is
allowed to run. The rotation speed is a measure of the kinetic energy that has
been derived from the initial stored potential energy due to the magnet
location above the drum magnets. Move the drum around slowly to
Ahern under-emphasizes the super-radiance and sub-radiance balance in
this paper. If he had made DPSR clear, then there is no primary violation.
DPSR - Dicke-Preparata super-radiance - proposes that certain spatial areas
can undergo intense semi-coherent energy excursions (localized energy
Dave,
Yes, a lot of stationary random processes will result in arbitrarily large
deviations from the mean, given unlimited time. I think the Fermi(-Ulam)
acceleration Ahern cites is different. Given the proper system
parameters, acceleration can be certain and (almost) monotonically
increasing.
Jones,
I read his patent months ago. He may address this there.
I need to re-read it.
LP
Jones Beene wrote:
Ahern under-emphasizes the super-radiance and sub-radiance balance in
this paper. If he had made DPSR clear, then there is no primary violation.
DPSR - Dicke-Preparata super-radiance
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:26:17 -0400:
Hi,
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
We know of one exception to the conservation of energy, which involves the
interchangeability of mass and energy. So the ultimate principle is
conservation of
Rt.com no longer seems available on the internet. Nothing; zip. Google Russia
Today news services and see the many URL addresses they show; all leading to
the same network solutions website. Went to watch the news this evening and
got dead ends. If they were under maintenance, would they say
The phenomena that we are discussing here is important. Jed, I read that same
book and it makes a great deal of sense to me as well. One paragraph stated
that a hot pan has more mass than a cold one due to the heat energy content.
Kinetic energy of protons and electrons can be thought of as
it is working for me...
Giovanni
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Harvey Norris harv...@yahoo.com wrote:
Rt.com no longer seems available on the internet. Nothing; zip. Google
Russia Today news services and see the many URL addresses they show; all
leading to the same network solutions
Talk about a strange way to advertise! I just got this letter 8 hours later
after posting info at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umddUU6viIkfeature=related
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
--- On Wed, 9/5/12, Help
Thanx for reply, I must have a virus or something. Wont bother the list anymore
with my histrionics... HDN over and out
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
--- On Wed, 9/5/12, Giovanni Santostasi gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
From:
I only just found out that Mats now has his own magazine (as managing
editor) :
http://matslew.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/we-just-launched-next-magasin-on-how-technologys-changing-the-world
A few days ago we finally launched
Next Magasin a new magazine on
how technologys changing the world
Big Bang Theory Challenged by Big Chill
ScienceDaily (Aug. 20, 2012) — The start of the Universe should be
modeled not as a Big Bang but more like water freezing into ice,
according to a team of theoretical physicists at the University of
Melbourne and RMIT University.
They have suggested that
Yes indeed, mass is reduced as matter is converted into energy, however, the
gravitational potential energy of the universe always remains in balance with
its positive energy. Photons have a gravitational influence.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter7.html#Pg12
Frank Znidarsic
At 01:26 PM 9/5/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
We know of one exception to the conservation of energy, which
involves the interchangeability of mass and energy. So the ultimate
principle is conservation of mass/energy.
This is certainly true over the universe as a whole since mass and energy are
equated by the famous E=M*C*C relationship. It is not true for a smaller
region where photons and other particles can escape the system boundary.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
At 01:43 PM 9/5/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Some of these presentations are a little . . . odd. Such as:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PopaSimilLroadmaptof.pdfhttp://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PopaSimilLroadmaptof.pdf
OMG
Regarding this one:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:24 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Enough time and a little friction will always eventually stop the device
if it is a scam.
Removing the battery doesn't hurt, either.
Eric
I wrote:
Removing the battery doesn't hurt, either.
Or, on second thought, the rubber band.
Eric
In reply to Jouni Valkonen's message of Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:27:51 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
I'm not sure whether or not it represents stored energy, but if you multiply the
MGO of a magnet by it's volume, you get a number of Joules (it's not much BTW).
On Sep 5, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
39 matches
Mail list logo
