Hi all
Have not read the whole thread yet; might it be that the forces involved
cause the Hydrogen to get sucked/pushed away from the surface into the bulk
of the hydrate in preference to starting the reaction and that in the case
of bulk materials the reaction only takes place when the bulk of
Hi all
This would explain the apparent success of the high fractal surface powders.
Kind Regards walker
On 8 May 2014 10:40, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Have not read the whole thread yet; might it be that the forces involved
cause the Hydrogen to get sucked/pushed away
Agree it is relevant to power density and less so for energy density since it
is only certain metal lattices that possess this property and the property is
far more dependent of the broken geometries of the lattice..how often and to
what extent defects occur seems more important than the volume
Greetings Vortex-L
Not sure if this has been covered before:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/08/solar-hydrogen-trends-claim-hydrogen-production-process-is-lenrtransmutation/
Ron Kita, Chiralex
High loading would lend itself well to a ZPE underpinning of the anomaly
because COE says that you cannot exploit HUP derived gas motion – that is you
can’t build a Maxwellian demon that sorts hot from cold atoms or separates
atomic from molecular to build opposing reservoirs as an energy
One further detail to put under the microscope, since the
devil is in the details…
As a general rule – therefore it can be said that there is
no correlation between loading ratio and heat unless it is related to
isotopes, meaning that this detail about the lack of
Jones wrote--
As a general rule – therefore it can be said that there is no correlation
between loading ratio and heat unless it is related to isotopes, meaning
that this detail about the lack of any correlation can be limited to
hydrogen (protium) and does not necessarily apply to deuterium
If the Pd-Ni alloy is face centered cubic matrix, it would have 3.75 Pd
and/or Ni nuclei per cell (1/2 nucleus on each cell face and 1/8 nucleus at
each corner of the cell) .
With 4:1 loading it means that there are more than 2 or more nuclei of D
or H, as the case may, in some cells.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
As a general rule – therefore it can be said that there is no correlation
between loading ratio and heat unless it is related to isotopes, meaning
that this detail about the lack of any correlation can be limited to
hydrogen (protium) and does not
Just got off the phone with the author and he doesn't see any indication
Tesla was onto the vector potential -- which Maxwell called electrokinetic
momentum.
BTW: He says Maxwell made no bones about the physical reality of
electrokinetic momentum -- he was quite clear it was physical.
On Wed,
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
As a general rule – therefore it can be said that there is no
correlation
between loading ratio and heat unless it is related to isotopes, meaning
that this detail about the
Peter,
Just for the record I do take poisoning seriously and think the
catalysts should be manufactured and maintained in vacuum except for the active
gas under test. IMHO the nano powder geometry would become smaller and more
robust in suppressing vacuum density if milled in a
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 7 May 2014 23:18:00 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
One thing I take issue with (more with standard practice in the CF
community
than with Jed in particular) is the use of the volume of the cathode in
calculating energy density. Since
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 8 May 2014 11:27:09 +:
Hi,
[snip]
I disagree with this portion of your reply [snip] Since the actual source of
energy is likely to be
the Hydrogen in the water, not the actual cathode metal, the volume of the
cathode is pretty much irrelevant
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
You do not calculate the energy density of engines. You calculate the
energy
density of fuels.
(Unless as Jed mentioned, you are stuck with the Hydrogen in the cathode,
and it
is not replaceable - in which case the outlook for CF is far more
restricted.)
I do
That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H!
2014-05-08 20:50 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
First, a well-established fact: The reaction produces helium.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H!
Well, I suppose it produces some other gas, probably deuterium. But the
point I was trying to make is that only half of the helium emerges. The
rest is trapped. So there is no process going on that
May 29 - 30, 2014, Chicago, IL
See:
http://www.thoriumenergyalliance.com/ThoriumSite/TEAC6.html
See what?
2014-05-08 22:45 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https://www.boxbe.com/overview This message is eligible
for Automatic Cleanup! (jedrothw...@gmail.com) Add cleanup
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
See what?
I see that Gmail and Boxbe spam filter have collaborated to make your
messages go bonkers.
Gmail thought that message I just sent was spam.
See this:
http://www.thoriumenergyalliance.com/ThoriumSite/TEAC6.html
- Jed
No, I saw that! :)
But I don't get the what I should look for in that site...
2014-05-08 23:12 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
See what?
I see that Gmail and Boxbe spam filter have collaborated to make your
messages go bonkers.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, helium is not hydrogen, but still, it does indicate there is
trapped gas.
For palladium and deuterium, where we know 4He is produced, 4He is immobile
in bulk palladium, while deuterium will escape over time.
22 matches
Mail list logo
