High loading would lend itself well to a ZPE underpinning of the anomaly because COE says that you cannot exploit HUP derived gas motion – that is you can’t build a Maxwellian demon that sorts hot from cold atoms or separates atomic from molecular to build opposing reservoirs as an energy sources since the motion is totally random and so slight that a singular device per atom is impossible and larger containments simply cancel out in our 3D macro world before they can be contained, but the saturated layer of gas in contact with a lattice topology full of defects approaches a 1D limit where that random motion is confined onto a single axis where said cancellation takes longer to occur and forces the layer to move back and forth across a region of space where the virtual particle density is changing at a rate that violates the isotropy of square law[forming a grater]. IMHO this operates like a saw that discounts the energy needed to disassociate gas molecules in violation of the caveat COE requires of gas law – A one Dimensional exception to COE that I believe is the bootstrap for these anomalies based on a self assembled type of Maxwell demon that uses HUP to discount molecular disassociation by opposing molecular motion vs atomic motion at a different ratio than it does in the unbroken isotropy of our 3D macro world. I suspect similar math would be apparent for relativistic hydrogen but there COE works out fine because we are supplying energy to accelerate the hydrogen thru the isotropy to force relativistic effects while inside bulk powders or skeletal cats no one is treating these defects with the same respect because we have all been told catalytic action like gas motion can not provide power….I disagree and propose the caveat should be amended to say can’t be exploited in 3D which leaves the door open for exploitation thru confinement. Fran From: Ian Walker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 5:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:nice essay Jed
Hi all This would explain the apparent success of the high fractal surface powders. Kind Regards walker On 8 May 2014 10:40, Ian Walker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all Have not read the whole thread yet; might it be that the forces involved cause the Hydrogen to get sucked/pushed away from the surface into the bulk of the hydrate in preference to starting the reaction and that in the case of bulk materials the reaction only takes place when the bulk of material is full to over flowing on to the surface or in to the cracks or whiskers that form the NAE? Kind Regards walker On 8 May 2014 05:13, Eric Walker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If Ed is right and the reaction occurs only at the surface, then there would be rapid exchange with hydrogen in the water. What I do not understand about that hypothesis is: Why is high loading important, in that case? Another possibility about the role of high loading -- it's useful in PdD cold fusion because it results in a prolonged release of hydrogen to the surface. Palladium interacts with hydrogen/deuterium differently than nickel does with hydrogen. In particular, hydrogen and deuterium are more soluble in palladium than nickel, if I remember correctly. Eric
