[Vo]:OT: trolling taken to a new level

On Reddit, there's a subreddit that follows the exploits of "Ken M", who comments on Yahoo! News and similar forums that focus on general news. https://www.reddit.com/r/KenM/ http://i.imgur.com/8h8sgrq.png http://imgur.com/QpSJ5Og Sometimes he can be uninformed in several ways, all in the same

RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPP

From: Roarty, Francis X * Perhaps vacuum energy cannot perform measurable work at our typical physical macro velocities relative to C … Well, it is pretty clear from the literature, starting in 2011 and continuing to recent papers - that the DCE the dynamical Casimir

[Vo]:Re: DCE for SPP

RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPPJones-- One further note coming out of Peter’s comments regarding the patent of Soininen of today is present below. The following quote from paragraph 33 of the patent follows: “Regarding the penetration of the Coulomb barrier around the atom nucleus, resonance of a wave

Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP

Axil, Perhaps vacuum energy cannot perform measurable work at our typical physical macro velocities relative to C but vacuum wavelengths / virtual particle density does define inertial frames and ,IMHO, can do work if you are not outputting reaction mass to push an object toward C. My point

Re: [Vo]:OT: trolling taken to a new level

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5ZDJrJsnYw Harry On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Reddit, there's a subreddit that follows the exploits of "Ken M", who > comments on Yahoo! News and similar forums that focus on general news. > >

Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:15:18 -0600: Hi, [snip] >On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:36 PM, wrote: > >I'm always a bit suspicious of theories that make use of "negative energy". >> > >It's what is needed to do negative work. Is that work, that once

Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:38 PM, wrote: >It's what is needed to do negative work. > > Is that work, that once having been done, requires even more work to fix > up the > result? :) > I was wondering what it was myself. :) It was fun to think about. Now I see why the

[Vo]:Re: DCE for SPP

It would seem that the same issues Robin raises that apply to the concept of negative energy apply to negative mass. Mass may be merely a continuous function with the boundary between negative and positive mass being associated with the boundary between virtual and real existence. Here I am

[Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

It seems the announcement of showing gravity waves are real is only of value to obscure academic discussions. Unless someone here might illuminate us about some practical derivatives that might be revealed due to the findings.

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP

Axil, well put! It is exactly as you say " that perhaps insufficient consideration may have been given to the integration with the larger system." , the mainstream considers the isotropy of open space a sort of ground state because virtual particles and Casimir effect were not considered. Nano

Re: [Vo]:maybe the best account and video of first LIGO gravity wave 2015.09.14: The New Yorker: Rich Murray 2016.02.11

I think it is more likely ​the Earth burped. Harry​ On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Rich Murray wrote: > maybe the best account and video of first LIGO gravity wave 2015.09.14: > The New Yorker: Rich Murray 2016.02.11 > >

Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP

If the vacuum can be induced to generate more virtual particle production in one location then another location of the vacuum must produce less virtual particle production to keep the average energy production of the vacuum zero. The suppression of virtual particles through this unbalancing

[Vo]:maybe the best account and video of first LIGO gravity wave 2015.09.14: The New Yorker: Rich Murray 2016.02.11

maybe the best account and video of first LIGO gravity wave 2015.09.14: The New Yorker: Rich Murray 2016.02.11 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2016/02/maybe-best-account-and-video-of-first.html http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/gravitational-waves-exist-heres-how-scientists-finally-found-them

Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:53:18 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Let us get to the bottom of this fear. Expand... It depends on exactly what is meant by negative energy. If meant in an absolute sense, then I am very doubtful. However if it's just a consequence of only considering

Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: By the way, gravitational waves were the topic of my dissertation so feel > free to ask any question about the topic. It is very fascinating. > Given enough time, development and resources, will it be possible to

Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

By the way, gravitational waves were the topic of my dissertation so feel free to ask any question about the topic. It is very fascinating. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > It opens a complete different window on the Universe. > The analogy

Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

It opens a complete different window on the Universe. The analogy that is often given is imagine the cosmic show is like a TV show. Until now we had video but not audio. Finally we turned the audio on. Gravitational waves are a different but complementary way to observe the universe. We already

Re: [Vo]:OT: trolling taken to a new level

Dirtpigs - I like it. :) On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:15 AM Eric Walker wrote: > On Reddit, there's a subreddit that follows the exploits of "Ken M", who > comments on Yahoo! News and similar forums that focus on general news. > > https://www.reddit.com/r/KenM/ >

Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

In another report I heard black hole collisions are thought to occur only once in a million years. Is that true? Also how can they know for certain that this not a seismic event? After all there is a great deal we do not know about the Earth's interior. Harry On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:27 PM,

Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

Like Russ George (see below), I see no connection between our CMNS field and gravity waves. Ludwik = On Feb 11, 2016, at 9:26 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > It opens a complete different window on the Universe. > The analogy that is often given is imagine the

[Vo]:an approach to the LENR crucial Principles

Just published http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/02/feb-11-2016-lenr-much-desired-crucial.html Solutions grow in many places Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Re: DCE for SPP

RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPPJones-- Most definitions of work derive from F=MA. E=Ft. I did not learn that EM energy, photons were work. However, definitions change with time. In addition I was not taught that all energy was equivalent. This was a concept that Einstein suggested, as far as I