Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Jones, On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > > Bob Higgins wrote: > >> A long CV doesn't make contradictory claims OK. >> > Maybe not, but the combined reputation and many long CVs of the dozens of > co-authors, overcomes many objections ... such as

Re: [Vo]:Tillerson Says China Should Be Barred From South China Sea Islands

Save for China, the other countries are in a really sorry state... each of them with its own reasons. India growth, in particular, is very irregular. BRICS are in a worst state than EU, save for China.

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

I don.t think that Holmlid is producing a hydrogen plasma at the place where the LASER strikes the collection foil, because the Ultra Dense hydrogen on the collection foil is not ionized as it falls by gravity from the iron oxide catalyst into the collection foil, A plasma would be too energetic

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Bob Higgins wrote: A long CV doesn't make contradictory claims OK. Maybe not, but the combined reputation and many long CVs of the dozens of co-authors, overcomes many objections ... such as measurement error, and can at least explain why the claims are not contradictory to known physics

[Vo]:New type of quantum phase transition...

FYI, Nothing earth-shattering, but perhaps of some interest. "Neutrons and a 'bit of gold' uncover new type of quantum phase transition" https://phys.org/news/2017-01-neutrons-bit-gold-uncover-quantum.html -mark

[Vo]:Fast particles

Dear Professor, The conventional means of producing muons is through bombardment with GeV particles in a particle accelerator. So if one had a cheap and efficient means of producing muons, then muon catalyzed D-D fusion might be economic. It seems you may have built such a particle accelerator,

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

I agree, the "Coulombic explosion" idea is wrong. I have my own theory based of the onset of Hole superconductivity and the meissner effect, SPP formation produced by the laser, and associated magnetic disruption of the proton structure. If you are interested, I will copy the relevant 5 posts

Re: [Vo]:Tillerson Says China Should Be Barred From South China Sea Islands

Quote from Jack Ma: > So what if the spent on Wall Street and the Middle East was spent on the > Mid-West of the United States, developing the industry there? That could > change a lot.” > I agree with just about everything he said, except that I quibble with this. The U.S. does not need more

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Axil Axil wrote: The use of a well defied magnetic field in the experiment can delineate > both the mass and polarity of the emergent subatomic particles. > As I mentioned, I don't trust Holmlid to do this right. It's not straightforward to

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

I agree with Axil’s comments about micro and nano domains. However I would add that the domains are what I call coherent QM systems that can initiate the change of nuclear potential energy/angular momentum to phonic lattice vibrations (thermal energy) of the coherent QM system with minor

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Hi Russ, On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Russ George wrote: Great comment on Holmlid’s body of work by Axil. I concur that people who > fire critiques of others work based on the fact that they are too lazy to > do anything other than make pompous comment on materials

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Holmlid is a worker in a science called metalic hydrogen. There a many fellow researchers in this field with some mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen Quote: "Shahriar Badiei and Leif Holmlid from the University of Gothenburg have shown in 2004 that condensed metallic

Re: [Vo]:Tillerson Says China Should Be Barred From South China Sea Islands

Jack Ma had the best answer to Tillerson. “Over the past thirty years, the Americans had thirteen wars spending 40.2 trillion dollars,” said Ma, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos. “What if they spent a part of that money on building up the infrastructure, helping the white-collar

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Holmlid has been writing papers on ultra dense hydogen since the early 1990s. There must be 100 produce so far. It is unreasonable to expect all the details about UDH and Holmlid's research into it over all those years to be recapitulated in this latest paper. Holmlid thinking on UDH has evolved

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

The use of a well defied magnetic field in the experiment can delineate both the mass and polarity of the emergent subatomic particles. On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Bob Higgins > wrote: >

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Great comment on Holmlid’s body of work by Axil. I concur that people who fire critiques of others work based on the fact that they are too lazy to do anything other than make pompous comment on materials based on their confusion stemming from the fact that everything in the author’s work is

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

In reply to Russ George's message of Sat, 21 Jan 2017 20:33:56 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Heat moves at the speed of sound in solids but is made at a far faster rate. Actually, it moves much slower. The speed of sound in steel is about 6 thousand meters/second. The length of a teaspoon is about 10 cm.

RE: [Vo]:Tillerson Says China Should Be Barred From South China Sea Islands

Doubt it. The BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, S.Africa) have launched a major global effort to provide a competitor to BIS/World Bank/IMF, and I seriously doubt if Russia would jeopardize all that by siding with U.S./Japan/Philipines on China’s expanding in S.China sea. From:

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

While I was ‘lobbing insults’ you were not the target. I have found your ideas and criticisms well thought out. Some others n Vortex-l not so. There is still the issue of Holmlid’s work being so very similar to some of the cold fusion work in terms of experimental design and operation. That

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Miley and Holmlid had a lonf standing partnership in thier research where Holmlids theories advanced in parallel with Miley. Maney of Holmlid's ideas about LENR added hot fusion come from this partnership: http://www.rexresearch.com/holmlid/holmlid.html Quote: Another reason why Olafsson feels

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: If we in Vortex want to make a useful contribution to Holmlid's reports, we > should propose and consider what other explanations are reasonable for his > data. > The thing I would like to see examined experimentally

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

It is a "troll-ism" to presume that I have NOT looked at Holmlid's previous publications. In fact, as I mentioned (and apparently you didn't consider), I have been trying to trace the foundation for H(0)/D(0) back through his papers to find the crux. I have over 40 of his papers, going back to

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Bob, You have expressed the arguments against Holmlid's interpretation being accurate quite well. Thanks for taking the time to do this. As I mentioned before, these arguments can be generally condensed into "show me more." Yet Holmlid is doing as much with small funding as can be reasonably

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Axil, I have those papers. A long CV doesn't make contradictory claims OK. If you have a reasonable explanation for the contradiction of the notion of "Coulombic explosion" and the H(0) having a lower Hamiltonian than H2, I want to hear it. Otherwise, you've got nothing. On Sun, Jan 22, 2017

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

Thanks Eric please do add me to your kill file, nothing could please me more. From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 10:39 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid. Hi Russ, On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Russ

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

If Holmlid is right about prolific production of muons in LENR, then LENR will look a lot like the initial use of oil and its associated CO2 loading at the beginning of the 20th century. But as the number of LENR driven engines increase into the billions, then the weight of muons on the byways and

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Bob Higgins wrote: Basically, I cannot get past the fact that Holmlid is building a huge > castle on a foundation of sand. > This is my sentiment exactly. Holmlid presents his work as experimental work, but there's such a long chain of

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

So far, as I keep reading Holmlid's latest paper, I keep coming to a statement, and I ask myself, "where's the support for this?" So I go through the string of references and find illogical hand waving or leaps of faith, but not logical support. This business of the "2.3 pm" spaced seems to

Re: [Vo]:Tillerson Says China Should Be Barred From South China Sea Islands

Perhaps the strategy is to get in good terms with Russia and both surround China?