Hi Venkat,
In my experience the handoff depends largely on your carrier, the
facilities in your building, and where you are in the world. I would
start out by finding out what the facilities look like at your site and
that will go a long way towards answering what your options are. A
quick walk
the development closely.
Thanks again,
Brandon
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Robert Bays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brandon,
Sorry to hear your first impression of Glendale was not up to
expectations. Could you help us to understand your reactions a little
better so we can improve
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the great feedback! We love to see this kind of input from
the community. It's incredibly helpful. Glendale has undergone a huge
number of changes and some of them, such as the CLI, are revolutionary
as opposed to evolutionary. The goal is to have Glendale's new
One other thing to look into... Make sure you're not using the RAID
functionality of the SIS964.
Robert Bays wrote:
Stefan,
Looks like grub isn't loading stage 1.5. One thing to check... In the
BIOS there may be a setting that switches the disk mode from normal to
LBA. It should be set
comments inline...
Michel van Horssen wrote:
Thing is, those messages talk about the IP command on the shell prompt,
there are also policies possible in the cli. Are those the same?
No. Policy routing is not included in the CLI right now. You must use
the ip command in the linux shell.
Our
Comments inline...
As you can see, the router seats in front of the load balancer.
First... generally whenever I plug out the network cable from the router,
and insert it back later, everything will fail to route.
Its as if the route table cannot get the new info on its own.. I have to
reset
Erwin,
What does show interfaces system say? Does the following command
sequence make any difference in the outcome?
set interfaces ethernet eth1 vif 20
commit
set interfaces ethernet eth1 vif 20 address 10.10.20.24 prefix-length 24
commit
cheers,
robert.
Erwin kobe Tolentino wrote:
I
Hi Troopy,
You want to look at netperf...
http://www.netperf.org/
Cheers,
Robert.
Troopy . wrote:
Hello,
i have a question not directy related to Vyatta but more to networking.
I am looking for a tool that is able to measure the (one-way) latency or
delay.
From what i know ping or
Max,
Are you looking for an x-flow collector or are you looking for the
Vyatta to be a flow exporter?
Cheers,
Robert.
Peter Wohlers wrote:
netflow == nice
sflow == better (imho, at least)
sflow is open, and gives L2 info as well as full bgp path stats rather
than just srcAS and peerAS
off the router.
All of our routers send flow data out to one of our collectors at the moment.
On Jan 17, 2008 1:41 PM, Robert Bays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Max,
Are you looking for an x-flow collector or are you looking for the
Vyatta to be a flow exporter?
Cheers,
Robert.
Peter
@mailman.vyatta.com
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with different
gateway
Ah silly me, the obvious
Thanks!
Daren
-Original Message-
From: Robert Bays [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 7:00 AM
To: Daren Tay
Cc: vyatta-users
Message-
From: Aubrey Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 6:19 AM
To: Robert Bays
Cc: Daren Tay; vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with different
gateway
hmmm I did not know you could do that with ip in linux
Daren,
If I am understanding you correctly you want to route the first local
interface out one gateway and the second local interface out the second
gateway. You would need to use source based routing to do what you are
looking for. That's not currently supported in the cli, but you can do
it
What kind of circuit is it? Do you need to clone your old MAC address?
Short of that it would help to be able to see the config.
Shane McKinley wrote:
I attempted the throw from Cisco to Vyatta last night, and failed.
From what I can see, the Vyatta configuration is comparable to the
Mathias,
We have installed on Soekris net4801 successfully before. Worked well
for a very low end system.
Cheers,
Robert.
Mathias Houngbo wrote:
Hi Everybody
are there someone who successfull install vyatta
software on Soekris or Pcengines Alix platform ?
thanks
--
Mathias HOUNGBO
Hi Saptarshi,
You can't change the queue type in the config right now. We are
shooting for a Q1 release that will allow you to do that. Take a look
at the following application note for now. It should give you some idea
of how to do what you are looking for.
Hi Troopy,
Attached is a new VC3 interfaces template file that should do what you
want. Just put it in /opt/vyatta/share/xorp/templates/ and reboot. It
will add an address parameter to the bridge interface. It doesn't add
the IP to XORP unfortunately. (I tried that but couldn't get it to work
Both tmpfs and unionfs are available in vc3.
I wouldn't put all of var under tmpfs unless you never plan on using
packages upgrades of any sort. However to change /var/log and /tmp to
tmpfs file systems you should edit your /etc/fstab to add something like
the following lines...
Make sure you
for Vyatta?
On the matter, is there anyone who did RAID 1 setup for their Vyatta router?
Should I just use 2 partition, a 10MB one (config) and a 450MB (main
partition)?
What are your recommended partitions?
Thanks!
Daren
-Original Message-
From: Robert Bays [mailto:[EMAIL
Sorry for the late reply everyone. Been out of town for a while. I
will try to summarize a few answers for this thread into one email.
Hope it's clear.
Vyatta uses iptables/netfilter for our firewall implementation. For
discussion refer to the following diagram... This is pulled from
section
Mike,
Did you try appending pci=biosirq to your kernel boot parameters? It
looks like the kernel is having a hard time allocating interrupts which
could prevent the eth driver from accessing the hardware which in turn
could prevent router manager from loading. If you haven't already, at
the
AFAIK, no one at Vyatta has tried a WRAP, but we have tried other Geode
based boards. You should be a able to make it work, but the limited
memory is definitely a factor for BGP. The kernel is currently
configured for 486/SMP not Geode. However, the Geode random, frame
buffer, and crypto
Hi Paco,
Paco Alcantara wrote:
If I have understood well, a bridge group allows the computer to work as
a switch where I can create groups of interfaces that belongs to the
same network domain. And I can also run spanning tree protocol in these
group of interfaces.
Yes.
Some questions
Simone,
We haven't tried vyatta in Xen 4, but it runs fine in Xen 3 with CPU
virtualization (Intel VT). Para-virtualization requires a kernel
rebuild, which isn't on our roadmap right now.
Cheers,
Robert.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I need to use vyatta in xensource enterprise 4.x
failed: 102 Command failed Interface error on
eth1.10: interface not recognized
On 18/09/2007, at 11:57 AM, Robert Bays wrote:
Hi Guys,
I know this response is *way* overdue... Sorry about that. FWIW, I
just tried this on a freshly booted livecd and didn't see any errors.
Maybe
25 matches
Mail list logo