Hello everyone.
As we are in discussion mood already, what do you think about making bugfix
releases? Is that something we should continue? Should we instead invest a bit
more time into QA before each feature release (gather some testers from the
community maybe?) and then stop caring about a
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 04:32:13 schrieb bugs buggy:
While this has been discussed before, I feel that we need more input from
everyone, so I created a poll to see what the community thinks is the best
course of action.
This concerns if we should do a 2.1 beta 5, or skip 2.1 beta 5, and
Hi Dennis/Buggy
On 22 Sep 2008, at 09:27, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 04:32:13 schrieb bugs buggy:
While this has been discussed before, I feel that we need more
input from
everyone, so I created a poll to see what the community thinks is
the best
course of
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to hear your opinions, ideas, insights.
Maybe you've got a different/better idea how to prevent long times of silence
between releases?
I like the current way, and do not think we can manage to create
releases
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:44:28AM -0400, bugs buggy wrote:
Phase 2 has been completed.
FMVs are now working for the intel screen, as can be seen by that thread.
I am using GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE_ARB to get around
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 10:51:15 schrieb Freddie Witherden:
Hi Dennis/Buggy
On 22 Sep 2008, at 09:27, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 04:32:13 schrieb bugs buggy:
While this has been discussed before, I feel that we need more
input from
everyone, so I created
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 11:08:33 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd like to hear your opinions, ideas, insights.
Maybe you've got a different/better idea how to prevent long times of
silence between releases?
I
Hi Dennis,
On 22 Sep 2008, at 13:06, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Try playing 2.1_beta4, it is quite poor so far as releases go.
2.1_beta5 is not going to go down well with people either if we break
their save games (will probably cause them not to upgrade).
That reminds me that we need some way to
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 15:29:09 schrieb Freddie Witherden:
Hi Dennis,
Hello Fred!
On 22 Sep 2008, at 13:06, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Try playing 2.1_beta4, it is quite poor so far as releases go.
2.1_beta5 is not going to go down well with people either if we break
their save games
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How far are the tagfile and database ideas? Any progress there? I know the
tagfiles basically seem got stuck after the early phase of implementing the
framework functions...
There is a separate tagfile branch, which is
Hey Dennis,
On 22 Sep 2008, at 16:24, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 15:29:09 schrieb Freddie Witherden:
Hi Dennis,
Hello Fred!
On 22 Sep 2008, at 13:06, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Try playing 2.1_beta4, it is quite poor so far as releases go.
2.1_beta5 is not going to
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Freddie Witherden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think that SQLite is the way to go, so far as future proofing
goes. Going straight to tagfile makes it a lot harder to go to SQLite
later on (two converters needed etc.). The advantages of a database
are also
On 9/22/08, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 04:32:13 schrieb bugs buggy:
While this has been discussed before, I feel that we need more input from
everyone, so I created a poll to see what the community thinks is the
best
course of action.
This
On 9/22/08, Freddie Witherden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Dennis,
On 22 Sep 2008, at 16:24, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 15:29:09 schrieb Freddie Witherden:
Speaking of conversion: The only thing that makes =2.1_beta4 games
not load in
2.1_beta4 is that the
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 18:40:02 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Freddie Witherden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think that SQLite is the way to go, so far as future proofing
goes. Going straight to tagfile makes it a lot harder to go to SQLite
later
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 18:41:04 schrieb bugs buggy:
On 9/22/08, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 04:32:13 schrieb bugs buggy:
We cannot release 2.2 just now. You are giving a wrong impression to the
community...
I *will* be full of bugs,
On 9/22/08, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 18:41:04 schrieb bugs buggy:
On 9/22/08, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, 22. September 2008 04:32:13 schrieb bugs buggy:
We cannot release 2.2 just now. You are giving a wrong
I was thinking it might be a good time to either split the repository into
dedicated sections, or have multiple repositories.
One should be only used for source, and the other only for data.
The question remains, do we stick with GNA, even though they still are
having some issue? Is having
bugs buggy wrote:
On 9/14/08, Tim Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice work :)
I tested on Linux (if you can wait about a week I can test it out on OS X)
and
only had a problem with the directory names in the extracted sequences
directory. I had to lowercase the first letters in the
On 9/23/08, Tim Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bugs buggy wrote:
On 9/14/08, Tim Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice work :)
I tested on Linux (if you can wait about a week I can test it out on OS
X)
and
only had a problem with the directory names in the extracted
20 matches
Mail list logo
