#2015: can't click "READY", assert failed
---+
Reporter: hao |Type: bug
Status: new |Priority: major
Milestone: unspecified | C
On 7/22/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 July 2010 at 15:23, buginator wrote:
> > Using SF & trac, I have come up with these changes so far, I think we
> > should try for a 2.3.2 release this weekend.
>
> Fine by me, probably. As you might have noticed, I've updated the Debian
> packag
On 7/22/10, dak180 wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Guangcong Luo wrote:
>
> > At the same time, I'd like to consolidate the video location to one
> > place. To do that, however, we'd need to get PhysFS to search
> > /Library/Application Support/Warzone 2100/sequences.wz, which I can't
> >
On 7/18/10, zare...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 11231
>
> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=11231&view=rev
> Author: zarelsl
> Date: 2010-07-18 23:38:56 + (Sun, 18 Jul 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Fix bug #1994 - hack some `#if
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM, buginator wrote:
> The way you did it here is with magic numbers, that can't possibly
> work with whatever font the user picks...
Nope, it'll only look right with the default font. But whatever font
Warzone looks best with should be the default font.
> I also don
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:06 PM, buginator wrote:
> I still don't see the reason for this. If it is a script, then it can
> rename whatever version the person wants just like we do for windows
> installer.
The main reason is that different filenames makes it easier to tell
whether high quality v
On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 15:05, buginator wrote:
> On 7/22/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
> > Fine by me, probably. As you might have noticed, I've updated the Debian
> > packaging so we can offer .debs, let's see how much feedback that gets.
>
> We would then make both tarballs and .debs ?
> Isn't t
Hey, guys.
We (dak180 and I) have been thinking about it for a while. We think
sequences.wz should be renamed to videos-sd.wz and videos-lq.wz.
The main reason for this change is that we need something other than
filesize to tell video quality. There are a few primary advantages to
doing this:
1
On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 14:45, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> And really zero disadvantages.
Except that it'll complicate the code a bit more if we have to look for two
extra files.
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listin
There's another disadvantage, users have to findout theier version
and rename it, except if you do that in code.
On 2010-07-23 21:53, Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 14:45, Guangcong Luo wrote:
>> And really zero disadvantages.
>
> Except that it'll complicate the code a bit more
Would be nice to have packages for different architectures/versions.
As example:
1.) Debian Lenny
2.) Debian Etch
3.) Ubuntu Lucid
4.) Ubuntu Karmic
To be True i don't known howto make them, but i think we/i could create
an https://launchpad.net/ account to automa
On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 22:10, Rene jochum wrote:
> There's another disadvantage, users have to findout theier version
> and rename it, except if you do that in code.
Well, I said "two extra files", that would search for the new files in addition
to the old one. Removing the old name seems like
Then i realy like this :-)
On 2010-07-23 22:22, Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 22:10, Rene jochum wrote:
>> There's another disadvantage, users have to findout theier version
>> and rename it, except if you do that in code.
>
> Well, I said "two extra files", that would search f
On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 22:14, Fastdeath wrote:
> Would be nice to have packages for different architectures/versions.
>
> As example:
> 1.) Debian Lenny
> 2.) Debian Etch
> 3.) Ubuntu Lucid
> 4.) Ubuntu Karmic
Etch? That seems quite old to me... But I think a package b
14 matches
Mail list logo
