Re: [wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2010-03-05 Thread Željko Filipin
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com wrote:
 I think we need a page called Support at http://watir.com/
 It should include Watir General, IRC, Jira and Stack Overflow.

Done. The page is not finished yet, I will work more on it next week.
Feedback is welcome.

Željko

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


Re: [wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2010-03-05 Thread Felipe Knorr Kuhn
Hello,

Regarding the Why isn't my question being answered? section, could you add
links to the How to handle popups Wiki page in the 4th paragraph?

FK

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Željko Filipin 
zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com
 wrote:
  I think we need a page called Support at http://watir.com/
  It should include Watir General, IRC, Jira and Stack Overflow.

 Done. The page is not finished yet, I will work more on it next week.
 Feedback is welcome.

 Željko

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Watir General group.
 To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
 Before posting, please read the following guidelines:
 http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comwatir-general%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


Re: [wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2010-03-05 Thread Željko Filipin
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Željko Filipin 
zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch wrote:
 Done. The page is not finished yet, I will work more on it next week.
Feedback is welcome.

I did not post the link:

http://watir.com/support/

Željko

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


Re: [wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2010-03-05 Thread Željko Filipin
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Felipe Knorr Kuhn fkn...@gmail.com wrote:
 Regarding the Why isn't my question being answered? section, could you
add links to the How to handle popups Wiki page in the 4th paragraph?

Would you please do that yourself? It is just a wiki page, everybody can
edit it. Please let me know if you need help with the wiki.

Željko

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


Re: [wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2010-03-05 Thread Felipe Knorr Kuhn
Done,

I had to reset password first because I haven't logged in ages. :)

FK

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Željko Filipin 
zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Felipe Knorr Kuhn fkn...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Regarding the Why isn't my question being answered? section, could you
 add links to the How to handle popups Wiki page in the 4th paragraph?

 Would you please do that yourself? It is just a wiki page, everybody can
 edit it. Please let me know if you need help with the wiki.


 Željko

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Watir General group.
 To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
 Before posting, please read the following guidelines:
 http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comwatir-general%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


Re: [wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2010-03-05 Thread Željko Filipin
2010/3/5 Felipe Knorr Kuhn fkn...@gmail.com
 I had to reset password first because I haven't logged in ages. :)

Thanks for editing the page. I will review it the next week when I continue
working on the support page.

Željko

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2010-03-05 Thread Tiffany Fodor
The Support page on Watir.com and the guidelines page on the wiki look
great!

Thanks guys!

-Tiffany

On Mar 5, 6:28 am, Željko Filipin zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch
wrote:
 2010/3/5 Felipe Knorr Kuhn fkn...@gmail.com

  I had to reset password first because I haven't logged in ages. :)

 Thanks for editing the page. I will review it the next week when I continue
 working on the support page.

 Željko

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general


[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-11-03 Thread Alan Baird
Bret/Z* - I will update the help page today.

Alan

On Nov 3, 2009 3:23 AM, Željko Filipin zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch
wrote:

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:00 AM, b...@pettichord.com bpettich...@gmail.com
wrote:  I guess for now...
I am afraid if we do not push it, that change will not happen. I will add
Stack Overflow to support in the next few days, and we will see if it picks
up in the following weeks and months.

 I would like to revise the tone of our support page to be more like  the
cucumber page. I haven...
I will try to update one of these days, if nobody does it before me. A few
people said they would like to help. If you have some time, please do it
instead of me. I will do my best to help you with the wiki and all that if
you are new. I would rather spend more time in helping somebody learn how to
edit wiki than it would take me to edit it myself. I see that as investment
in future contributions.

Željko

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this
message because you are su...

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-11-03 Thread Bret Pettichord

Željko Filipin wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:00 AM, b...@pettichord.com 
 mailto:b...@pettichord.com bpettich...@gmail.com 
 mailto:bpettich...@gmail.com wrote:
  I guess for now, I would say that people should be told that they can
  post questions in either location. There are very few people actually
  answering watir questions on stackoverflow right now. Basically it is
  just you Zeljko, although I did see Mark A make an appearance.

 I am afraid if we do not push it, that change will not happen. I will 
 add Stack Overflow to support in the next few days, and we will see if 
 it picks up in the following weeks and months.
We've been teaching the larger community to ask questions here for 
years. If you ask a Watir question on one of the Ruby forums, you will 
likely be sent here.

I'm still trying to understand the pros and cons of stack overflow. 
You've convinced me to spend more time there. If you personally think it 
is better and would prefer using it, you can tell people that that is 
the best way to get an answer from you.

Bret

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-11-03 Thread Željko Filipin
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com wrote:
 If you personally think it
 is better and would prefer using it, you can tell people that that is
 the best way to get an answer from you.

Stack Overflow is to this group like Git is to trying to remember what you
have changed in your code and not using version control.

I will do my best to answer any question tagged watir in Stack Overflow. I
am not sure how I would advertise that.

Željko

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-11-03 Thread Bret Pettichord

Željko Filipin wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com 
 mailto:b...@pettichord.com wrote:
  If you personally think it
  is better and would prefer using it, you can tell people that that is
  the best way to get an answer from you.

 Stack Overflow is to this group like Git is to trying to remember what 
 you have changed in your code and not using version control.

 I will do my best to answer any question tagged watir in Stack 
 Overflow. I am not sure how I would advertise that.
I think we need a page called Support at http://watir.com/

It should include Watir General, IRC, Jira and Stack Overflow. Some of 
this stuff is on the community page already. Maybe the community page 
could focus a little more on how to help (rather than get help).

I also think you are getting frustrated with some of the questions here. 
I suggest that you see if maybe you can just reply less to requests that 
annoy you. That's what I'm doing.

Bret

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-11-03 Thread Alan Baird
I made a first pass at adding some additional stuff to
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support.  Let me know what you think and
if you can make it better please do.

Alan

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-11-02 Thread Željko Filipin
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com
wrote:
 Good suggestion. I just set up a login for that site and will start
 spending more time there.

Since three of four* top posters to this group (
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general/about) think moving to Stack
Overflow is a good idea, I think it would be good to start the move there.

Since nobody except Bret any myself is really for it, I plan not make any
drastic changes. I plan just to change all our documentation to say support
is at Stack Overflow and I will leave this groups as it is, but it's use
will be encouraged for discussions, while Stack Overflow will be for
support. I plan to create a wiki page explaining how to use Stack Overflow.

Anybody thinks that is not a good idea?

Željko

--

* If you take a look at top posters list, you will see my name listed twice,
because I have two accounts. I thought it would be more effective to say
three of four than top two. :)

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-11-02 Thread b...@pettichord.com

I guess for now, I would say that people should be told that they can
post questions in either location. There are very few people actually
answering watir questions on stackoverflow right now. Basically it is
just you Zeljko, although I did see Mark A make an appearance.

I would like to revise the tone of our support page to be more like
the cucumber page. I haven't really had the time for this, but maybe a
couple of people could work on this. I guess the place to start would
be what would you write in an email to a friend who was new to watir?

Bret

On Nov 2, 8:06 am, Željko Filipin zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch
wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com
 wrote:

  Good suggestion. I just set up a login for that site and will start
  spending more time there.

 Since three of four* top posters to this group 
 (http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general/about) think moving to Stack
 Overflow is a good idea, I think it would be good to start the move there.

 Since nobody except Bret any myself is really for it, I plan not make any
 drastic changes. I plan just to change all our documentation to say support
 is at Stack Overflow and I will leave this groups as it is, but it's use
 will be encouraged for discussions, while Stack Overflow will be for
 support. I plan to create a wiki page explaining how to use Stack Overflow.

 Anybody thinks that is not a good idea?

 Željko

 --

 * If you take a look at top posters list, you will see my name listed twice,
 because I have two accounts. I thought it would be more effective to say
 three of four than top two. :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-30 Thread Mark Anderson
I also monitor the watir tag at stackoverflow.com.  There have been very few
queries there, and if they are of slightly higher quality than the average
question here, I think that it is because of the barriers to entry there
(OpenID, website vs email, etc).  

 

There is another site that I think might make more sense than stackoverflow.
http://testing.stackexchange.com http://testing.stackexchange.com/  is a
hosted stackoverflow solution that is specific to testing.  It is still
young, and does not even have a watir tag yet.

 

I don't think that either of these solutions is capable of replacing
watir-general at this time.

 

I am willing to join and contribute to a watir-beginners list.

 

I also wonder whether some sort of FAQ posted on a regular basis, probably
mainly pointing to the wiki/documentation, would help with these problems.

 

/\/\ark

 

  _  

From: watir-general@googlegroups.com [mailto:watir-gene...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Željko Filipin
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:34 PM
To: watir-general@googlegroups.com
Subject: [wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

 

I have been thinking about this for a long time, and it just came to me that
it is related to this thread. I think the time has come to take Watir
support to the next level.

Have you heard about site called Stack Overflow? I use it all the time.
Created by Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky. If you do not know who they are
just google them.

How it works? You log in with openid, ask question, tag it with watir. There
is a feed for the tag. We subscribe to the feed and answer questions.

It is the future of support. It is a very useful merge of support forum,
digg and wiki with features like tagging questions, closing duplicate
questions (with link to original question), voting on good questions and
answers (so good and interesting questions and answers float to the top).
Since it is also a wiki, questions and answers can be edited (including
adding and removing tags). When you type a title for the question and start
typing the body, it automatically searches the site and displays similar
questions under the title. Just what we need. No more please search before
you ask. The site searches for you.

There are some watir questions already there, but not much. I have put some
to try things out:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/watir
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/firewatir

Watin folks use it much more:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/watin

You get points for each up vote you get. There are also badges. Makes
answering questions more like a game.

There is added benefit. If we get a question that is for example more ruby
related, we can tag it with ruby (if it is not already tagged) and then all
users that follow that tag will see it and probably answer.

We could close this group, or leave it only for discussion, and move all
support to Stack Overflow. We could make this group moderated, and approve
only discussion posts, and reject all support with a note to post ti to
Stack Overflow. If we agree on that, I volunteer to do that for the next
month, and probably longer if needed.

More information:

http://stackoverflow.com/
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/category/podcasts/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow

If anybody wants to know more about it, just ask. If this is not appropriate
place to talk about it, sent your question to me directly.

What do you think? Has the time to move come? Or do you think we should stay
here for now?

Željko


 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4556 (20091029) __

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com

 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4557 (20091030) __

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com

 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4558 (20091030) __

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-30 Thread Željko Filipin
Hi Mark,

My comments are inline.

2009/10/30 Mark Anderson mander...@drillinginfo.com
 I also monitor the watir tag at stackoverflow.com.  There have been very
few queries there, and if they are of slightly higher quality than the
average question here, I think that it is because of the barriers to entry
there (OpenID, website vs email, etc).

I do not think we will get better questions there. We will just have a
better tool for dealing with bad questions. Automatic search while entering
question might help too.

 There is another site that I think might make more sense than
stackoverflow.  http://testing.stackexchange.com is a hosted stackoverflow
solution that is specific to testing.

I would prefer that we use stackoverflow if we decide to go there. We get
more ruby related questions than testing related.

 I don’t think that either of these solutions is capable of replacing
watir-general at this time.

Why do you think so?

 I am willing to join and contribute to a watir-beginners list.

I do not think we need such list. watir-general is that list. You are
welcome to contribute here.

 I also wonder whether some sort of FAQ posted on a regular basis, probably
mainly pointing to the wiki/documentation, would help with these problems.

I have already tried that. One e-mail each month for months. This is just
one thread:

http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general/browse_thread/thread/6252098614f59822

I did not notice any improvement.

Željko

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-30 Thread Bret Pettichord

Good suggestion. I just set up a login for that site and will start 
spending more time there.

Bret

Željko Filipin wrote:
 I have been thinking about this for a long time, and it just came to 
 me that it is related to this thread. I think the time has come to 
 take Watir support to the next level.

 Have you heard about site called Stack Overflow? I use it all the 
 time. Created by Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky. If you do not know who 
 they are just google them.

 How it works? You log in with openid, ask question, tag it with watir. 
 There is a feed for the tag. We subscribe to the feed and answer 
 questions.

 It is the future of support. It is a very useful merge of support 
 forum, digg and wiki with features like tagging questions, closing 
 duplicate questions (with link to original question), voting on good 
 questions and answers (so good and interesting questions and answers 
 float to the top). Since it is also a wiki, questions and answers can 
 be edited (including adding and removing tags). When you type a title 
 for the question and start typing the body, it automatically searches 
 the site and displays similar questions under the title. Just what we 
 need. No more please search before you ask. The site searches for you.

 There are some watir questions already there, but not much. I have put 
 some to try things out:

 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/watir
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/firewatir

 Watin folks use it much more:

 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/watin

 You get points for each up vote you get. There are also badges. Makes 
 answering questions more like a game.

 There is added benefit. If we get a question that is for example more 
 ruby related, we can tag it with ruby (if it is not already tagged) 
 and then all users that follow that tag will see it and probably answer.

 We could close this group, or leave it only for discussion, and move 
 all support to Stack Overflow. We could make this group moderated, and 
 approve only discussion posts, and reject all support with a note to 
 post ti to Stack Overflow. If we agree on that, I volunteer to do that 
 for the next month, and probably longer if needed.

 More information:

 http://stackoverflow.com/
 http://blog.stackoverflow.com/
 http://blog.stackoverflow.com/category/podcasts/
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow

 If anybody wants to know more about it, just ask. If this is not 
 appropriate place to talk about it, sent your question to me directly.

 What do you think? Has the time to move come? Or do you think we 
 should stay here for now?

 Željko

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-29 Thread Željko Filipin
I have been thinking about this for a long time, and it just came to me that
it is related to this thread. I think the time has come to take Watir
support to the next level.

Have you heard about site called Stack Overflow? I use it all the time.
Created by Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky. If you do not know who they are
just google them.

How it works? You log in with openid, ask question, tag it with watir. There
is a feed for the tag. We subscribe to the feed and answer questions.

It is the future of support. It is a very useful merge of support forum,
digg and wiki with features like tagging questions, closing duplicate
questions (with link to original question), voting on good questions and
answers (so good and interesting questions and answers float to the top).
Since it is also a wiki, questions and answers can be edited (including
adding and removing tags). When you type a title for the question and start
typing the body, it automatically searches the site and displays similar
questions under the title. Just what we need. No more please search before
you ask. The site searches for you.

There are some watir questions already there, but not much. I have put some
to try things out:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/watir
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/firewatir

Watin folks use it much more:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/watin

You get points for each up vote you get. There are also badges. Makes
answering questions more like a game.

There is added benefit. If we get a question that is for example more ruby
related, we can tag it with ruby (if it is not already tagged) and then all
users that follow that tag will see it and probably answer.

We could close this group, or leave it only for discussion, and move all
support to Stack Overflow. We could make this group moderated, and approve
only discussion posts, and reject all support with a note to post ti to
Stack Overflow. If we agree on that, I volunteer to do that for the next
month, and probably longer if needed.

More information:

http://stackoverflow.com/
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/category/podcasts/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow

If anybody wants to know more about it, just ask. If this is not appropriate
place to talk about it, sent your question to me directly.

What do you think? Has the time to move come? Or do you think we should stay
here for now?

Željko

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-27 Thread Tim Koopmans

I also like the tone of that page.

I think it's a really bad idea to either humiliate people or go over-
the-top with rules like SQAForums.

Maybe some people are lazy, others might just be ignorant but I try
not to judge as I don't know their circumstances. The questions I've
answered here and via justaddwatir.com were well placed and helped me
understand watir better in answering them so it's been a positive
experience for me. Guess what I'm saying, the choice is the collective
(ours) as to whether or not poorly described problems get answered!

Cheers
Tim



On Oct 26, 9:36 am, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com wrote:
 Jari Bakken wrote:
  On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:

  Perhaps a wiki page on what information is needed from people in order for
  them to get help - the initial response could just be a link to that page,
  and if they don't reply with information that generally conforms to what is
  required, it gets ignored.

  I totally agree with this. Check out the Before you ask section
  here:http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/get-in-touch

 I really like the tone of that page. Maybe we could modify our support
 page to sound a little more like this.

 Bret

 --
 Bret Pettichord
 Lead Developer, Watir,www.watir.com
 Blog,www.io.com/~wazmo/blog
 Twitter,www.twitter.com/bpettichord

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-25 Thread Jari Bakken

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
 Perhaps a wiki page on what information is needed from people in order for
 them to get help - the initial response could just be a link to that page,
 and if they don't reply with information that generally conforms to what is
 required, it gets ignored.


I totally agree with this. Check out the Before you ask section
here: http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/get-in-touch

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-25 Thread Bret Pettichord

Jari Bakken wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 Perhaps a wiki page on what information is needed from people in order for
 them to get help - the initial response could just be a link to that page,
 and if they don't reply with information that generally conforms to what is
 required, it gets ignored.

 

 I totally agree with this. Check out the Before you ask section
 here: http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/get-in-touch

   
I really like the tone of that page. Maybe we could modify our support 
page to sound a little more like this.

Bret


-- 
Bret Pettichord
Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com
Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog
Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-24 Thread Željko Filipin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Chris christopher.mcma...@gmail.com
wrote:
 2. is a bad option.  That one nearly killed the Perl community a
 decade ago, and it's still an issue.

+1

I do not want to become one of those cranky unix (and obviously perl) gurus
with long beards that reply only with rtm or similar.

 one option might be to emulate the Perl community of the time and
 start a 'watir-beginners' list

We have such list. This is it. Big majority of the posts here (my rough
estimate is 99%) are from people new to Watir. We have other lists
(wtr-development and wtr-core) that are not for beginners.

 with a commitment from some veterans
 to spend time there

I have committed some time to help people here, but I can not read minds. I
need data to help. The problem is not lack of will to help, the problem is
that there are a lot of really bad questions.

 but emphasize that it is a list for newbies to
 help each other.

How would you do that?

Željko

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-24 Thread Alan Baird
I'm for being more firm, but with limits.  We can't help people that can't
help themselves - or at least none of us have the time for it.  I believe
that people with legitimate questions, that don't know how to ask them or
use the right words will keep trying if they are lead in the right
direction.  These are the people we want to help.  As long as the prompting
for the right information is not condescending, patronizing or rude, it
should be fine to direct askers of questions to a canned section of the wiki
for more info along with some hint of which guideline they are in violation
of.  Those people that are really trying should at least be able to improve
their questions.  If they can't figure this out, then my vote is for nobody
to answer their e-mail unless the information is provided.

I readily admit that I haven't been as good at this as I should.  It's hard
sometimes to realize when the question has been asked already in (several)
different threads.  I'll try to be better.

I think the webpage at: http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support is
probably sufficient for people to be redirected to.  Possibly subtitle it
why is nobody answering my question??.  I was thinking about one possible
section to add: things you can do that definitely will not get your
question answered.  I could add this unless somebody objects.

Alan

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-24 Thread Željko Filipin
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Alan Baird aba...@bairdsnet.net wrote:
 I was thinking about one possible section to add: things you can do that
definitely will not get your question answered.  I could add this unless
somebody objects.

Please do.

Željko

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Chris


 1. Stop responding to incomplete requests. Maybe they will repost with
 more information. Maybe not. Anyway, just ignore them.
 2. Humiliate them and question their right to claim to be a tester if
 they can't even report a problem correctly. Make it clear that Watir is
 only for testers who have some basic competence.
 3. What else?

2. is a bad option.  That one nearly killed the Perl community a
decade ago, and it's still an issue.

one option might be to emulate the Perl community of the time and
start a 'watir-beginners' list, with a commitment from some veterans
to spend time there, but emphasize that it is a list for newbies to
help each other.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Željko Filipin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com
wrote:
 1. Stop responding to incomplete requests. Maybe they will repost with
 more information. Maybe not. Anyway, just ignore them.

Until I get some time for a longer reply, I just want to say I will ignore
bad questions.

Željko
--
watir.com - community manager
watirpodcast.com - host

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Jason Trebilcock
Seems to me, if we're receiving 'incomplete requests', then maybe there's a
way to drive towards more complete requests.

In the LoadRunner forum on SQAForums, they're pretty militant about getting
environment information upfront before they'll answer questions.
Maybe if we adopted some sort of a set of questions to be answered, then we
might get some more thorough questions and be better able to provide
answers.

Something akin to:
Ruby version:
Watir version:
OS/browser versions:
Code:
HTML:
What's wrong/not working/whatever (how 'bout an error message?):

Granted, there are some questions (and/or people) for whom this might be a
little ridiculous...but it could make for an easy template to spit back at
the incomplete request.

Like you said, it really isn't terribly different from someone logging a
defect/enhancement/whatever. So a little pushback, I think, might get things
moving in a better direction.

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.comwrote:


 This is a note to those of you who are answering other people's
 questions here. The rest of you can stop reading.

 Really. If you stay I'll just hurt your feelings.

 Ok. We need to have a frank discussion. We're getting a lot of crappy
 questions.

 There are a lot of requests for help coming in where the requester is
 posting way too little information for any one to possibly help them.
 And what's worse, you ask for more info and they reply with a lot of
 blather, but don't actually give you the information that we need to
 answer their questions.

 I've been getting sucked into this myself lately. I feel bad for them. I
 want to help. When you say it doesn't work, are you getting an error
 message? How many times do we need to ask this here? And then they
 reply, telling us they tried something else, but it didn't work either,
 and they still don't give us an error message! Or they give us just part
 of the error message. Or they leave out the stack trace. I guess they
 assume that because the stack trace looks like a bunch of gibberish, it
 won't help us either. You'd almost think that maybe they don't know
 anything about testing software or how to write a bug report.

 I learned how to extract a stack trace from a core file 20 years ago so
 that I could include it in my bug reports. With Ruby it just gets
 printed out. It's just a matter of cut and paste.

 Can we see your script?. Have you read the FAQ? What have you
 tried? -- How many times do we have to ask these questions?

 What can we do about it?

 1. Stop responding to incomplete requests. Maybe they will repost with
 more information. Maybe not. Anyway, just ignore them.
 2. Humiliate them and question their right to claim to be a tester if
 they can't even report a problem correctly. Make it clear that Watir is
 only for testers who have some basic competence.
 3. What else?

 Bret

 --
 Bret Pettichord
 Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com
 Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog
 Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord


 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Bret Pettichord

Chris wrote:

 one option might be to emulate the Perl community of the time and
 start a 'watir-beginners' list, with a commitment from some veterans
 to spend time there, but emphasize that it is a list for newbies to
 help each other.
Any one interested in doing this?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Bret Pettichord

Jason Trebilcock wrote:
 Seems to me, if we're receiving 'incomplete requests', then maybe 
 there's a way to drive towards more complete requests.

 In the LoadRunner forum on SQAForums, they're pretty militant about 
 getting environment information upfront before they'll answer questions.

 Maybe if we adopted some sort of a set of questions to be answered, 
 then we might get some more thorough questions and be better able to 
 provide answers.

 Something akin to:
 Ruby version:
 Watir version:
 OS/browser versions:
 Code:
 HTML:
 What's wrong/not working/whatever (how 'bout an error message?):

 Granted, there are some questions (and/or people) for whom this might 
 be a little ridiculous...but it could make for an easy template to 
 spit back at the incomplete request.

 Like you said, it really isn't terribly different from someone logging 
 a defect/enhancement/whatever. So a little pushback, I think, might 
 get things moving in a better direction.
I guess it feels like a little pushback is what we are doing now, 
without much effect.
Check out the top paragraph here: 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general

Bret


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Tiffany Fodor

I try to give them a shot and ask for more information.  If they don't
provide any, I ignore the question.

One of my favorite things about Watir is the group of really great
people who support it and the patience they showed me when I was just
learning.  You're right, though, there are some people who will never
rtfm.

Maybe we could re-word the Attention Please section to be more
specific about the information we need and when people post questions
without it, we could just copy/paste that text into the thread.  It
might save a bit of time in replying and let people know that we're
serious about including it.

-Tiffany

On Oct 23, 2:34 pm, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com wrote:
 Jason Trebilcock wrote:
  Seems to me, if we're receiving 'incomplete requests', then maybe
  there's a way to drive towards more complete requests.

  In the LoadRunner forum on SQAForums, they're pretty militant about
  getting environment information upfront before they'll answer questions.

  Maybe if we adopted some sort of a set of questions to be answered,
  then we might get some more thorough questions and be better able to
  provide answers.

  Something akin to:
  Ruby version:
  Watir version:
  OS/browser versions:
  Code:
  HTML:
  What's wrong/not working/whatever (how 'bout an error message?):

  Granted, there are some questions (and/or people) for whom this might
  be a little ridiculous...but it could make for an easy template to
  spit back at the incomplete request.

  Like you said, it really isn't terribly different from someone logging
  a defect/enhancement/whatever. So a little pushback, I think, might
  get things moving in a better direction.

 I guess it feels like a little pushback is what we are doing now,
 without much effect.
 Check out the top paragraph here:http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general

 Bret
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Ethan
Perhaps a wiki page on what information is needed from people in order for
them to get help - the initial response could just be a link to that page,
and if they don't reply with information that generally conforms to what is
required, it gets ignored.

Of course, some people asking questions here don't even seem to know any
ruby. Don't think there is much to be done for them, apart from maybe
recommending a decent ruby book ... that could go on the wiki too. Do you
know ruby? If not, please read and understand one of these recommended ruby
books and then come back to the Watir mailing list.

Ethan


On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 16:57, Tiffany Fodor tcfo...@comcast.net wrote:


 I try to give them a shot and ask for more information.  If they don't
 provide any, I ignore the question.

 One of my favorite things about Watir is the group of really great
 people who support it and the patience they showed me when I was just
 learning.  You're right, though, there are some people who will never
 rtfm.

 Maybe we could re-word the Attention Please section to be more
 specific about the information we need and when people post questions
 without it, we could just copy/paste that text into the thread.  It
 might save a bit of time in replying and let people know that we're
 serious about including it.

 -Tiffany

 On Oct 23, 2:34 pm, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com wrote:
  Jason Trebilcock wrote:
   Seems to me, if we're receiving 'incomplete requests', then maybe
   there's a way to drive towards more complete requests.
 
   In the LoadRunner forum on SQAForums, they're pretty militant about
   getting environment information upfront before they'll answer
 questions.
 
   Maybe if we adopted some sort of a set of questions to be answered,
   then we might get some more thorough questions and be better able to
   provide answers.
 
   Something akin to:
   Ruby version:
   Watir version:
   OS/browser versions:
   Code:
   HTML:
   What's wrong/not working/whatever (how 'bout an error message?):
 
   Granted, there are some questions (and/or people) for whom this might
   be a little ridiculous...but it could make for an easy template to
   spit back at the incomplete request.
 
   Like you said, it really isn't terribly different from someone logging
   a defect/enhancement/whatever. So a little pushback, I think, might
   get things moving in a better direction.
 
  I guess it feels like a little pushback is what we are doing now,
  without much effect.
  Check out the top paragraph here:
 http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
 
  Bret
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Željko Filipin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
 Perhaps a wiki page on what information is needed from people in order for
them to get help

Take a look at the footer of every e-mail from this group. You will find
this:

Before posting, please read the following guidelines:
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support

Željko
--
watir.com - community manager
watirpodcast.com - host

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Bret Pettichord

Bret Pettichord wrote:
 Jason Trebilcock wrote:
   
 Check out the top paragraph here: 
 http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general

 Bret

   
The guidelines link was broken. I just fixed it. Maybe that will help.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Nathan Lane
Hey Zeljko, I didn't mean to offend. By no means must one have a background
in a Computer Science related field to understand software testing. I think
it helps because in order to test software very effectively I think you must
be able to understand it. Anyway, detail-oriented-ism and an eye for
problems is far more important. I work with plenty of programmers who
couldn't test software to save their lives. No offense to any programmers
who can't test software very well either.
With my second statement, I simply mean to say that Watir.com provides a
very complete center for learning about Watir, searching through previous
posts to watir-general, and so on. There is no excuse for a beginner in my
opinion not to first try and look over what documentation is available,
including the wiki pages and watir-general. That is what I am trying to say
by, With Watir.com though, I am having a very hard time ignoring such
behavior.

Sorry for any confusion.

Nathan

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Željko Filipin 
zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch wrote:

 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Nathan Lane nathamberl...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Surprisingly many people who test software don't have a solid background
 in Computer Science, general programming, software architecture or any
 related field.

 I am one of them. But I have a brain, and I know how to use it. Maybe that
 is the problem.

  With Watir.com though, I am having a very hard time ignoring such
 behavior.

 I am not sure I understood this. Could you elaborate?

 Željko


 



-- 
Nathan Lane
Blog, http://blog.nathandelane.com

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Željko Filipin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Nathan Lane nathamberl...@gmail.com
wrote:
 I didn't mean to offend.

I did not get it as an insult. :) I just wanted to say that I think you just
need to have a brain, and you will be able to ask a good question. Maybe it
is a language problem. Maybe people just do not know English enough. Maybe
we need lists in other languages.

 With my second statement, I simply mean to say that Watir.com provides a
very complete center for learning about Watir.

From your previous post I was not sure do you mean that, or that
watir.comsucks. Now I know. :) Alister did a great job.

Željko

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[wtr-general] Re: Answering incomplete requests

2009-10-23 Thread Željko Filipin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Bret Pettichord b...@pettichord.com
wrote:
 2. Humiliate them and question their right to claim to be a tester if
 they can't even report a problem correctly. Make it clear that Watir is
 only for testers who have some basic competence.

I do not think this would be a good idea. Crappy questions bug me, but I
would like to keep friendly note in the group.

Željko

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Watir General group.
To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com
Before posting, please read the following guidelines: 
http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
watir-general-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---