Jac,
Somehow the orange works for me, too...wasn't sure about it at first
with the others' comments, but...it's Irish. :-) It was enough to give
me the itch to go to the rally.
Since I'm an editor at heart, here's a few minor details:
Accommodations page: Articulated Truck is misspelled (left
jac asked:
...if you've got a minute can you recommend a method of backing up
files.
Erich suggested:
Do you have a CD or DVD burner? I was backing up my home machine on
CD's with no problem. If you don't have a burner consider that a great
investment and write it off. CD burners are now
oh my god it's like handing up homework for correction at school! lol thanks
Tim... i tried to watch my spelling and such but obviously some got through.
Stackmaking? not sure myself but to hazard a guess I'd say it's probably
bales of hay/straw or something along those lines?? maybe someone on
I figured it out. I put style definition right before the section I need
it in. Luckily its at the end of the page.
Ken
At 12:20 PM 4/3/03 +1200, you wrote:
well then, take advantage of the pseudo class properties, i.e. a.nav: link
etc. in your style sheet and inline a class=nav ..
alls well that ends well then, lol
Michael Ensor
www.WellingtonLive.co.nz
- Original Message -
From: Ken Patenaude [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 4:56 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: CSS and Links
: I figured it out. I put style definition right before
Hello.
I am creating a form section for a client website where some of the form
data will contain sensitive info (like ssn and driver's license number). I
can serve the form from a secure server, but how do I get the data back to
the client securely? Do I have to use some kind of secure email,
Steve,
I'm not aware of any way to 'send' them anything securely. If its necessary to
display their information for verification purposes or some such, I would email them a
link to a secure page.
m2c,
Stephen Caudill
Steve Miller wrote:
Hello.
I am creating a form section for a client
Stephen,
Thanks for the fast response and good idea! I have heard of using
pgpmail.pl, but I assume this requires the client to have a pgp client
installed and the public key somewhere. I just don't know much about it.
steve
From: Stephen Caudill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
Steve Miller wrote:
Stephen,
Thanks for the fast response and good idea! I have heard of using
pgpmail.pl, but I assume this requires the client to have a pgp client
installed and the public key somewhere. I just don't know much about
it.
steve
No Problem Steve,
Here's what
a client is giving me some greif conserning this site
www.rolunda.se/index2.htm since it doesn't work fit into 800 x monitors or
(his - and don't ask me why!) 1024 monitor adjusted to 840 - He says a
compeditors site doesn't give him this problem. What is a solution?
//Gerrie
The WDVL
I'd say your best bet would be to design for a max width of 720px within
liquid tables of 100%.
That way they'll always fit the screen.
HTH
jac.
- Original Message -
From: Gerrie Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 10:55 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk]
Gerrie,
Your site is in a table of width 906, that is why it will not fit at lower
resolutions of if the browser window is not maximized.
The photograph you are using is 496 pixels wide. The logo is another 310
pixels. Together, they will add up to more than an 800 by 60 resolution can
handle.
I get a horizontal scroll bar at anything less than 915px wide. You table is
set to 906px wide to which you need to add the browser defaults and space
for scrollbars. So you will always have a horizontal scroll on any 800x600
screen and unless you reduce the size of the image of the Gustavsson's
Just at a glance, you have your main layout table set to 906px wide.
Looks like you'd have to change the layout. I noted you're using
dreamweaver for an IDE and static HTML pages, did you set up a DW
template? or are you looking at having to change every page?
I just looked at some of the
On April 03, 2003 at 23:55, Gerrie Warner wrote:
monitors or (his - and don't ask me why!) 1024 monitor adjusted to 840
- He says a compeditors site doesn't give him this problem.
As you have found out, the competion makes sites that are liquid and if not, they
are a static size to fit the
Hi Jac
NN7.1 800x600 WinXP
A great site as usual. I especially liked your choice of
color combination on the 'accommodation info' page. All
links worked well and your graphics look very good.
Using IE6.0 1024x768 WinXP
Typed words are a little small, but readable.
Sorry it takes so long, I'm on
Gerrie,
I got redirected to some sort of porn site. What's going on?
Sherry
Gerrie Warner wrote:
a client is giving me some greif conserning this site
www.rolunda.se/index2.htm since it doesn't work fit into 800 x monitors or
(his - and don't ask me why!) 1024 monitor adjusted to 840 - He
Hi all,
Glad to see that the list got livened up a bit. Still not the 100 posts
per day we used to have in the good ol'days but better than the 4 posts we
had 2 weeks ago!!
Anyway, here's a question:
Concerning web scripting languages like PHP or ASP, is it better to build a
big class containing
Concerning web scripting languages like PHP or ASP, is it better to
build a big class containing all the methods/properties that you online app
would need (like db access, xml parsing, file system functions etc) and to
call the appropriate methods/properties whenevr they are needed or is
Hi Mark,
Actually that's what I do, each module has it's own class. But I was
wondering if going the procedural way was not faster. When I begun, that was
the way I used to do things. But later I turned down to classes since those
offer more advantages and are easier to manage. But are they faster
Please, avoid talking about those
24-hours-a-day-coffee-and-cigarettes-no-lunch-at-regular-intervals days
8-)
I left those aside and am resting a bit. Though I'll get back to C++ soon.
Got some encryption implementation work to do. (mummy, where are you!!)
lol
Paul
-Original Message-
21 matches
Mail list logo
