> On Mar 6, 2020, at 6:59 PM, Patrick Griffis wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-06 6:51 pm, John Wilander wrote:
>> Hi Patrick!
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this up. I’ll share my view of where we are.
>>
>> First of all, cookies mostly live in the http layer so the various
>> WebKit ports would have to
> 6 марта 2020 г., в 18:29, Ryosuke Niwa написал(а):
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:15 PM Kirsling, Ross wrote:
>>
>> Late on Friday seems like a good time for a terminological debate (), so I’d
>> like to propose we revisit one of the strangest items of WebKit-specific
>> terminology: the
On 2020-03-06 6:51 pm, John Wilander wrote:
> Hi Patrick!
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. I’ll share my view of where we are.
>
> First of all, cookies mostly live in the http layer so the various
> WebKit ports would have to work this out independently to some extent.
> Maybe libcurl and
Hi Patrick!
Thanks for bringing this up. I’ll share my view of where we are.
First of all, cookies mostly live in the http layer so the various WebKit ports
would have to work this out independently to some extent. Maybe libcurl and
libsoup have readily available APIs for this?
Second, we
07.03.2020, 05:41, "Kirsling, Ross" :
> I'd be thrilled for us to use 'revert'.
> Somehow I'd convinced myself that it'd be easier to ask for this if we kept
> the 'roll' part, but I'm not really sure why I thought so.
On the negative side, it won't be possible anymore to say that someone is
I agree this usage of “roll out” is potentially confusing.
I think people say “roll out” for the symmetry to “check in”. It also creates
the convenient term “roll back in” for when a rollout is undone.
Personally, I think we should say “revert” and avoid use of roll-phrases
entirely.
Current WebKit trunk blocks all third party cookies (with ITP enabled), which
is a more extreme version of the same thing. We’re currently testing the
compatibility fallout.
Treating cookies as SameSite=Lax by default is moot when third-party cookies
are blocked, as the SameSite=None behavior
I'd be thrilled for us to use 'revert'.
Somehow I'd convinced myself that it'd be easier to ask for this if we kept the
'roll' part, but I'm not really sure why I thought so.
Of course, it's fine for folks to continue to _say_ 'roll out' due to habit; I
just think it would be great if our
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:15 PM Kirsling, Ross wrote:
>
> Late on Friday seems like a good time for a terminological debate (), so I’d
> like to propose we revisit one of the strangest items of WebKit-specific
> terminology: the phrase ‘roll out’.
>
> In our industry, the typical meaning of the
Greetings WebKittens,
Late on Friday seems like a good time for a terminological debate (), so I’d
like to propose we revisit one of the strangest items of WebKit-specific
terminology: the phrase ‘roll out’.
In our industry, the typical meaning of the phrase ‘roll out’ is, of course,
Chromium has had the idea to treat all cookies as SameSite=Lax by
default as well as blocking SameSite=None over HTTP for a while now,
hidden behind a flag, and seem to be rolling this out soon.
The topic is discussed in detail here:
Hi,
I've just uploaded a patch[1] (based on previous work from my colleague
Žan Doberšek) which brings a very basic WebXR[2] support for WebKit.
Right now is just IDLs, stubs and pretty basic platform code, mostly
empty implementations anyway.
You can see WebXR[3] as the evolution of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
