[webstack-discuss] code review: update to Apache 2.2.15

- Petr.Sumbera at Sun.COM wrote: | Hi, | | can somebody please review this straightforward update? | | http://cr.opensolaris.org/~xsumbe00/6937352-apache-2.2.15/ Looks good. Do "we" need to file a simple ARC case to note the new module and configuration directives? Here's the one for 2.2

[webstack-discuss] tomcat on os2009.06: SUNWapch22m-jk or SUNWtcat ?

- solarg at laposte.net wrote: | On 03/15/10 03:06 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: | > | > - solarg at laposte.net wrote: | > | > | hello all, | > | i need to migrate an app from an old solaris 10 tomcat 5 on an | > | opensolaris server. | > | What do i need? SUN

[webstack-discuss] tomcat on os2009.06: SUNWapch22m-jk or SUNWtcat ?

- solarg at laposte.net wrote: | hello all, | i need to migrate an app from an old solaris 10 tomcat 5 on an | opensolaris server. | What do i need? SUNWtcat? SUNWapch22m-jk ? yes | with the availibity of os2010.03, is there any change in the name of | packages? Those old package names wi

[webstack-discuss] content length exceeding INT_MAX

jean jayet wrote: > I'm using an http conf where all http requests are routed to a reverse > proxy http server (which is an RH 5.2 32 bits native http 2.2.3) > > Web server mod_weblogic module forwards requests to Oracle WebLogic > Server where a web app is deployed and serve the requests Here's

[webstack-discuss] ld.so.1: sendmail: warning: /usr/apache2/2.2/lib/port_getn_interposer_32.so: open failed: illegal insecure pathname

solarg wrote: > On 03/ 3/10 08:58 AM, solarg wrote: >> >> On 03/ 2/10 09:25 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> >>> solarg wrote: >>>> >>>> hello all, >>>> >>>> i'm using the workaround is the tarball portfs_hang.tar.g

[webstack-discuss] ld.so.1: sendmail: warning: /usr/apache2/2.2/lib/port_getn_interposer_32.so: open failed: illegal insecure pathname

solarg wrote: > > hello all, > > i'm using the workaround is the tarball portfs_hang.tar.gz given by > Jeff Trawick. > After installing a new app that send mails, i found these warnings in > my logs, even if the mail is correctly send: > ld.so.1: sendmail: war

[webstack-discuss] has anyone looked at the new Web Stack package names in snv_133?

David.Comay at Sun.COM wrote: >>> Note that the mod_php5.so is delivered as a link to mod_php5.2.so >>> although the conf file is php5.2.conf. If we ever needed to support >>> two PHP releases, will Apache likely require different plugins to >>> support both? > >> Though, we might, in future, deliv

[webstack-discuss] SUNWapch22 and SUNWimagick fail with portfs_hang

101b, my websites often hang, and i have to > > restart httpd. > > work-around for hang sent to you directly (it is also attached to an old > thread in this list and accessible from the forum view) > > the workaround is the tarball portfs_hang.tar.gz given by Jeff Trawick. > I

[webstack-discuss] *DRAFT! *DRAFT! Removal of 5.0 ARC Case

sunanda menon wrote: > > Hi , > > Could you kindly review the draft ARC case writeup for the removal of > MySQL 5.0 at http://wikis.sun.com/display/WebStack/MySQL5removalARC > and send me your feedback by this week end. looks reasonable to me For readability, I suggest changing "5.0 in OpenSola

[webstack-discuss] has anyone looked at the new Web Stack package names in snv_133?

David.Comay at Sun.COM wrote: a. SUNWapr13 web/library/apache/apr-13 This is a general purpose portable OSS library like glib or others. Should it really go under "web"? (obviously a web server depends on it) >>> >>> It's the only thing under web/library, and the meaning

[webstack-discuss] has anyone looked at the new Web Stack package names in snv_133?

Nick Kew wrote: > On 20 Feb 2010, at 13:03, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > >> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+indiana/Renamed+Packages+in+Build+133 >> >> I'll try to spend a little time to propose some changes; if anyone else is >> going to bother to

[webstack-discuss] has anyone looked at the new Web Stack package names in snv_133?

http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+indiana/Renamed+Packages+in+Build+133 I'll try to spend a little time to propose some changes; if anyone else is going to bother to look at the Web Stack-related packages then we can discuss here. A few questions/concerns from looking at the table for

[webstack-discuss] Code review request for 6918376

sunanda menon wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the code changes made for the CR#6918376 at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6918376/ and let me know your > comments. > > 6918376 [OSOL > B131] User profiles only available for mysql50 (need to

[webstack-discuss] Reminder: Code review request for the 6918313

sunanda menon wrote: > sunanda menon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Trying to fix the 6918313 with the yassl security patch,a known issue >> with mysql. >> Please check the code changes made and let me know your comments. >> URL : http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6918313 +1

[webstack-discuss] 2009.06 apache22 stuck

Stefan Kreutter wrote: > trawick wrote: > >> [...] >> Please try the attached work-around and report back. >> The work-around >> consists of a library interposer which sits between >> APR and libc and >> makes port_getn() act like APR expects. >> [...] >> > > Where can I find this attachm

[webstack-discuss] Reminder: Review: Xerces-C++ and Xalan-C++ integration into SFW

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Thanks for the review, Jeff. > > On 01/05/10 20:22, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Seema Alevoor wrote: >>> Please review. >>> >>> Seema Alevoor wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Please review the below webre

[webstack-discuss] Review request: Apache JServ removal

Petr Sumbera wrote: > Hi, > > can I have someone to review following changes? > > PSARC/2009/672 EOF Apache JServ > 6910922 Apache 1.3 JServ module removal > 6912906 Apache 1.3 init.d script shouldn't refer to Tomcat > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~xsumbe00/6910922-jserv/ looks reasonable to me

[webstack-discuss] Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/php/5.2/modules/gd.so'

Jacob Ritorto wrote: > Ran in to this problem on OpenSolaris 2009.06 within a zone (no special > tweaks anywhere -- just did a normal 2009.06 install, then created a zone > with default settings and installed SUNWamp). We didn't have time to > troubleshoot fully and found that the zone didn't h

[webstack-discuss] code review request for CR: 6913465

at the time of startup. okay no concerns here with the patch > > - Sriram > > On 1/4/10 6:33 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Sriram Natarajan wrote: >>> Hi >>> Can you kindly review the fix for this CR: 6913465 opensolaris b130 >>> PHP problems with s

[webstack-discuss] Reminder: Review: Xerces-C++ and Xalan-C++ integration into SFW

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Please review. > > Seema Alevoor wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please review the below webrevs. >> >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6847117/ --> Integrate xerces c >> libraries into SFW a couple of nitpicks: xercesc-2.7/Patches/MsgCatalogLoader.cpp.patch.patch A more proper fix i

[webstack-discuss] code review request for CR: 6913465

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > Hi > Can you kindly review the fix for this CR: 6913465 opensolaris b130 > PHP problems with session_start(); > > WebRev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sn123202/php-b131.3/webrev/ the user has to edit memcache.ini to make it do anything, right? if so, why not also comment

[webstack-discuss] what are the differences betwwen SUNWpach22 and webstack?

solarg wrote: > On 12/28/09 04:06 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> solarg wrote: >>> hello all, >>> on my os2009.06 b111b, i'm running SAMP, with SUNWapach22, but since >>> i've upgraded from b101b, my websites often hang, and i have to >&

[webstack-discuss] what are the differences betwwen SUNWpach22 and webstack?

solarg wrote: > hello all, > on my os2009.06 b111b, i'm running SAMP, with SUNWapach22, but since > i've upgraded from b101b, my websites often hang, and i have to > restart httpd. work-around for hang sent to you directly (it is also attached to an old thread in this list and accessible from t

[webstack-discuss] Code Review request for mysql-5.1.37 Upgrade(CR 6857014)

sunanda menon wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Kent Boortz wrote: >>> Jeff Trawick writes: >>> >>>> GNU make builds a target when it does not exist or when it is older >>>> than a prerequisite. That's different than what you're sugges

[webstack-discuss] Code Review request for mysql-5.1.37 Upgrade(CR 6857014)

Kent Boortz wrote: > Jeff Trawick writes: > >> GNU make builds a target when it does not exist or when it is older >> than a prerequisite. That's different than what you're suggesting -- >> that make rebuilds the target if it is not newer than the >> p

[webstack-discuss] Code Review request for mysql-5.1.37 Upgrade(CR 6857014)

Kent Boortz wrote: > Webstack reviewers, > > I'm part of the MySQL build team and worked with Sunanda on this > issue. I will try explain what this change is about. > > Those "sleep" commands could likely be removed. The reason they are > there is that I have seen "sleep" used to make time stamps "

[webstack-discuss] Code Review request for mysql-5.1.37 Upgrade(CR 6857014)

sunanda menon wrote: > usr/src/cmd/mysql-5-1/Makefile.sfw - Why all of the touching of files and the sleep statements? It's hard to see what this achieves aside from adding 20-odd seconds to the build time. >>> >>> >>> Since we are patching the mysql-5.1.37 source ba

[webstack-discuss] Urgent! Urgent!Re: Code Review request for mysql-5.1.37 Upgrade(CR 6857014)

sunanda menon wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> sunanda menon wrote: >>> Please review >>> >>> sunanda menon wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Please review the code changes for mysql-5.1.37 upgrade at >>>> http://cr.ope

[webstack-discuss] Urgent! Urgent!Re: Code Review request for mysql-5.1.37 Upgrade(CR 6857014)

sunanda menon wrote: > Please review > > sunanda menon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please review the code changes for mysql-5.1.37 upgrade at >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6857014/ >> >> Let me know your comments. Why do we need *usr/src/cmd/mysql-5-1/patches/xO4_optimization.patch? Isn't optim

[webstack-discuss] image-update to build 129 removed Apache?

Neal Pollack wrote: > On 12/14/09 01:45 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Neal Pollack wrote: > > > root at zbit:~# cd /var/apache2/2.2/logs > root at zbit:/var/apache2/2.2/logs# tail error_log > [Mon Dec 14 14:00:33 2009] [warn] Init: Session Cache is not > configured [hint:

[webstack-discuss] image-update to build 129 removed Apache?

Neal Pollack wrote: > On 12/14/09 01:30 PM, Neal Pollack wrote: >> My desktop also runs a web server for our department's reports. >> I did a pkg image-update from 128, (each build, 128 and prior, had >> working >> web server for our weekly reports). >> >> After image-update to build 129, apache2.

[webstack-discuss] cr 6907454 - correct the mod_fcgid.conf file

rahul wrote: > [rahul:] > | [Jeff Trawick:] > | > rahul wrote: > | >> Hi, > | >> The updated patch for > | >> 6907454 apache22 fcgid fails to load, daemon starts, stops and restarts > ad nauseum > | >> is available here.

[webstack-discuss] /usr/ucb/echo and apxs+libtool

After upgrading snv_128a to snv_129 via image-update, a call to apxs within the httpd test framework fails because /usr/ucb/echo isn't found: /usr/apache2/2.2/bin/apxs -D APACHE2 -I/export/home/trawick/svn/httpd-test/c-modules -c mod_echo_post_chunk.c /usr/apr/1.3/build/libtool --silent --mode=

[webstack-discuss] Code review request for CR6902877 & 6818295

sunanda menon wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the Code changes for the following bugs at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6818295/. > > 6902877 [nvb127] subselect test generates crash of the server. > 6818295 [nvb110] Mysql server core dump when running tests > 'execution_constants' It looks

[webstack-discuss] cr 6907454 - correct the mod_fcgid.conf file

rahul wrote: > Hi, > The updated patch for > 6907454 apache22 fcgid fails to load, daemon starts, stops and restarts ad > nauseum > is available here. > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/fcgid.conf/ > > is /var/run/apache2/2.2 the better place for those files? should there be a separate CR

[webstack-discuss] Code Review Request for mysql 5.1 Upgrade from 5.1.30 to 5.1.37

sunanda menon wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> sunanda menon wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have replaced the mysql-5.1.37 tarball with that of patching the >>> mysql-5.1.37.tar.gz source from the download site. >>> Please review the changes made at

[webstack-discuss] Code Review Request for mysql 5.1 Upgrade from 5.1.30 to 5.1.37

sunanda menon wrote: > Hi, > > We have replaced the mysql-5.1.37 tarball with that of patching the > mysql-5.1.37.tar.gz source from the download site. > Please review the changes made at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6857014/ and let me know your > comments. > > Thanks Sunanda > > Is

[webstack-discuss] Review: Fix for CRs 6902632 and 6895945

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Hi, > > Webrev for the below two CRs is at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6902632/ > Please review. > +1/Thanks! > > CR 6902632 - EINTR regression with Solaris apr_pollset_poll() > in APR 1.3.9 > CR 6895945 - APR cross-process mutex choice can lead to fatal > errors in s

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] Code review for Ruby patch level update (CR-6871383)

Amanda Waite wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Mike Sullivan advised me that the extra protofix lines may have been > added by them and are required for incrementals. He was right so I've > put them back. While I was at it I found that the patches were being > applied twice during incrementals so I manipula

[webstack-discuss] nginx hangs on sendfilev

Anil wrote: > I am having to keep restarting nginx. Have you guys came across this? It > seems to now happen at least once every other day. > > nginx version: nginx/0.6.35 > From a non-nginx user: 0.6.35 seems rather out of date, and 0.6 is now a legacy release anyway. I'd recommend building

[webstack-discuss] code review request for CR 6899209

Basant Kukreja wrote: > Hi, >Kindly review the webrev for the bug > 6899209 : Compile zend_execute.c with -W2,-Ainline:inc=100 for performance > gains > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~basantk/6899209/webrev/ > general comment about existing use of -O0: I used -O0 for eons when building http

[webstack-discuss] greetings, and could use some help

Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > I've been invited (http://twitter.com/dsp_/status/5350037022) > to post my question here, so here goes. > > I've got 2009.06 running on an EC2 instance. > >From time to time, my Apache processes just freeze. This sucks. > > Sucks badly enough that my client (insightcrui

[webstack-discuss] split php 3rd party extns into separate php packages..

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > > 6891913 deliver httpd conf file for PHP integration via FastCGI when > mod_php can't be used This one didn't make it into the webrev. You probably need to split this one out anyway because the proposed conf file uses features of mod_fcgid 2.3.4; integration of that i

[webstack-discuss] how to debug stuck httpd MPM setting on b125

hat I did this to myself, though I don't remember doing it :( pkg fix SUNWapch22 resolved the problem sorry for the noise > > Regards, > Seema. > > On 10/29/09 16:52, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> The worker MPM is getting started even though server_type is set to >> prefo

[webstack-discuss] how to debug stuck httpd MPM setting on b125

The worker MPM is getting started even though server_type is set to prefork. $ svcs apache22 STATE STIMEFMRI disabled7:19:29 svc:/network/http:apache22 $ ps -ef | grep httpd $ svccfg -s apache22 listprop httpd/enable_64bit httpd/enable_64bit boolean false $ svccfg -s apache2

[webstack-discuss] review mod_fcgid-2.3.4 (cr 6875538)

rahul wrote: > I have updated the below directory with a patch to avoid problems in > config.apxs.log, Please see if this is ok. > > | >> Hi, > | >> Can I please get this reviewed ? (updating mod_fcgid to latest) > | >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/mod_fcgid-2.3.4/ > Hi Rahul, That lo

[webstack-discuss] httpd users: any negative experiences with "AcceptMutex pthread" on [Open]Solaris?

(going back as far as Solaris 10) Context: The APR default on Solaris is fcntl, because of some problems recovering the mutex after a child process crash on now-ancient levels of Solaris. The choice of fcntl is bad news for a threaded server which uses an accept mutex (e.g., worker MPM with m

[webstack-discuss] Review: Update HTTPD to 2.2.14

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the changes for updating HTTPD to 2.2.14. > Webrev is at http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6886627/ s/mdoules/modules/ in install-apache2 and install-apache2-64 otherwise it looks okay to me

[webstack-discuss] review mod_fcgid-2.3.4 (cr 6875538)

rahul wrote: ii. SUNWapch22m-fcgid/pkginfo.tmpl.patch: Does this line need to have the exact version of mod_fcgid? DESC="FastCGI plugin for Apache Web Server Version 2.2 (2.3.4)" >>> It was a later convention (After the original integration of mod_fc

[webstack-discuss] review mod_fcgid-2.3.4 (cr 6875538)

rahul wrote: >> rahul wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Can I please get this reviewed ? (updating mod_fcgid to latest) >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/mod_fcgid-2.3.4/ >>> >>> >> I just have a few trivial comments. Hopefully Seema will have time to >> review as well, and Jyri will l

[webstack-discuss] review mod_fcgid-2.3.4 (cr 6875538)

rahul wrote: > Hi, > Can I please get this reviewed ? (updating mod_fcgid to latest) > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/mod_fcgid-2.3.4/ > I just have a few trivial comments. Hopefully Seema will have time to review as well, and Jyri will look at the ARC soon after he returns. i. METADAT

[webstack-discuss] review: 6893577 service startup for squid

rahul wrote: > Hi, > Could I please get this reviewed > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/6893577-squid > +1

[webstack-discuss] draft ARC case for the mod_fcgid upgrade

(attached) -- next part -- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: fcgid-2.3.4-arc.txt URL:

[webstack-discuss] Review: Update APR to 1.3.9

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Hi, > > Webrev for updating APR to 1.3.9 is at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6885257/ > > Please review. +1

[webstack-discuss] review squid large file support for logs 6889225

rahul wrote: >>> checking Default FD_SETSIZE value... 65536 >>> >> 384d385 >> < configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --enable-for-via-db, >> --with-threads >> >> >> It looks like the build environment it is picking >> (POSIX_V6_LPBIG_OFFBIG) is not appropriate. The output looks much

[webstack-discuss] user-visible mod_fcgid changes between 2.2 and 2.3.4

Jyri Virkki wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> Does any of this need to be covered in an ARC case? >> something I forgot to mention, which does need to be covered: move samples-conf.d/fcgid.conf to conf.d/fcgid.conf, following the philosophy that if an extension is

[webstack-discuss] review squid large file support for logs 6889225

rahul wrote: >> maybe this? >> >> squid-2.7.STABLE6$ ./configure >> --with-build-environment=POSIX_V6_ILP32_OFFBIG --with-large-files > >> > > This was my oversight, I should just let squid determine build-env > automatically any way. > > I have updated the diffs, also I have changed the i

[webstack-discuss] user-visible mod_fcgid changes between 2.2 and 2.3.4

Does any of this need to be covered in an ARC case? 1. A reference guide is now included: Presumably the reference guide will now be installed with the OpenSolaris package SUNWapch22m-fcgid. /usr/apache2/2.2/manual/mod/mod_fcgid.html /usr/apache2/2.2/manual/mod/mod_fcgid.html.en (view at http:

[webstack-discuss] Code Review request for Mysql5.0 upgrade

sunanda menon wrote: > Hi, > > I have made changes for the Mysql 5.0 upgrade from (5.0.81) to 5.0.86 > bits. > Please review at http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6891350/ and let > me know your comments. +1

[webstack-discuss] review squid large file support for logs 6889225

Jeff Trawick wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> rahul wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Can I please get this reviewed? >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/squid-6889225/ >> >> I don't see any references on the web to the use of >> "--with-larg

[webstack-discuss] review squid large file support for logs 6889225

Jeff Trawick wrote: > rahul wrote: >> Hello, >> Can I please get this reviewed? >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/squid-6889225/ > > I don't see any references on the web to the use of > "--with-large-files=POSIX_V6_ILP32_OFFBIG". Shouldn't

[webstack-discuss] review squid large file support for logs 6889225

rahul wrote: > Hello, > Can I please get this reviewed? > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/squid-6889225/ > I don't see any references on the web to the use of "--with-large-files=POSIX_V6_ILP32_OFFBIG". Shouldn't it just be "--with-large-files"? on 2009.06: squid-2.7.STABLE6$ ./config

[webstack-discuss] PHP integration for worker and/or 64-bit httpd

Jeff Trawick wrote: > Sriram Natarajan wrote: >> >> >> Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> SUWNapch22m-php52 (mod_php) installs a conf file that loads mod_php >>> and sets up handler associations for php files, if the 32-bit httpd >>> with prefork MPM is us

[webstack-discuss] PHP integration for worker and/or 64-bit httpd

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > > > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> SUWNapch22m-php52 (mod_php) installs a conf file that loads mod_php >> and sets up handler associations for php files, if the 32-bit httpd >> with prefork MPM is used. >> > >> SUNWphp52 installs php-

[webstack-discuss] PHP integration for worker and/or 64-bit httpd

Jeff Trawick wrote: > It seems that such a conf file belongs to SUNWphp52, which delivers > the PHP FastCGI support, but it shouldn't depend on httpd; also, > perhaps it would be disturbing to not use httpd at all but have > /etc/apache2/2.2/conf.d ??? > > mod_fcgid

[webstack-discuss] PHP integration for worker and/or 64-bit httpd

SUWNapch22m-php52 (mod_php) installs a conf file that loads mod_php and sets up handler associations for php files, if the 32-bit httpd with prefork MPM is used. SUNWphp52 installs php-cgi, which can be used with any httpd mode via mod_fcgid (FastCGI). We could install php-fastcgi.conf which s

[webstack-discuss] Draft case for collectd integration within OpenSolaris

Amit Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > The draft ARC case for collectd (a system statistics collection > daemon) integration within OpenSolaris is attached. Kindly review the > same and let me know if you have any comments. a few minor comments: > 5.2. Imported Interfaces Should Perl or Java be included

[webstack-discuss] Draft ARC case for Apache mod_proxy_html and mod_xml2enc

Nick Kew wrote: > We'd like to include these Apache modules in future releases. > They serve to enable the Apache proxy to act as a gateway to > web-based systems, even where such systems generate HTML > links that are not accessible (or even addressable) from > the outside world, and so would not

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

Trond Norbye wrote: > Hi, > > The webrev thread for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1 turned into a > discussion if we should use "-u" on the command line or > method_credentials in the SMF in order to specify the user to run as. > > I agree that using method_credentials (username and privileges

[webstack-discuss] update php to 5.2.10 within opensolaris

Seema Alevoor wrote: > > > On 10/01/09 02:41, Sriram Natarajan wrote: >> Seema >> The web rev has been updated to address your comments. >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sn123202/php5211.1/webrev/ >> > > Looks fine. +1

[webstack-discuss] Error loading Modules:MySQL server has gone away

" " wrote: > rats! I too just setup joomla 1.5.14 on SXCE b113 and of course I get the > same error. Unfortunately my development platform is a dual core centrino = I > got the 32bit kernel 4evah. > Folks, is it build 125 that resolves this failure of 32-bit MySQL, or something earlier, or ??

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

Chris Josephes wrote: >> *I think this is a question of fully utilizing SMF security features, >> along with potentially maintaining patches to some of the open source >> code to bypass their own cross-platform security implementation, and >> needing to help users understand why our delivery of a f

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

Chris Josephes wrote: > And if Memcache does not properly fit into the guidelines of SMF, why did you > create a manifest in the first place? Why not just use a script in > /etc/rc3.d? > This same question* could apply to just about any of the Web Stack features. It should be obvious why S

[webstack-discuss] Lighttpd update Arc Case draft

Amanda Waite wrote: > Are we good to go with these Arc cases or do I need to drop OpenLDAP > support for now? IMO leave OpenLDAP out of this ARC; a common ARC should be used for OpenLDAP later.

[webstack-discuss] Next release?

Philip wrote: > Hello, all! Is there any place I should look for an indication of when the > next release of Webstack will be available and what software versions it will > provide? Also, how often is the Webstack patched, simply regarding security > version updates in existing compenents? > >

[webstack-discuss] 6857014: Code Review Request for Mysql Upgrade to 5.1.37

sunanda menon wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> METADATA: >> The download URL >> (http://dev.mysql.com/get/Downloads/MySQL-5.1/mysql-5.1.37-dtrace.tar.bz2) >> doesn't exist. >> >> >> SUNWmysql51test/prototype_com: >> Why is

[webstack-discuss] 2009.06 apache22 stuck

Anil wrote: > Apache goes unresponsive. I test using telnet to port 80 and do a GET, no > response comes back from the server. I then have to restart the service to > make it work. > > I used dtrace to capture some data and I see these calls: > ... > 3 83394 ___errno:entry >

[webstack-discuss] 6857014: Code Review Request for Mysql Upgrade to 5.1.37

sunanda menon wrote: > > Hi , > Planning to upgrade MySQL 5.1 to 5.1.37 .Can you please review this at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6857014/ > > and let me know your comments. METADATA: The download URL (http://dev.mysql.com/get/Downloads/MySQL-5.1/mysql-5.1.37-dtrace.tar.bz2) doesn't

[webstack-discuss] any mod_fcgid users out there?

please see http://blogs.sun.com/trawick/entry/any_mod_fcgid_users_out

[webstack-discuss] OpenLDAP in SFW

Amanda Waite wrote: > Ok, I just read: > > "Sun products should consider Volatile interfaces as equivalent to > Consolidation Private. A contract is required for use of these > interfaces outside of the supplying consolidation" > > In the Interface Taxonomy spec. I didn't expect it to be document

[webstack-discuss] OpenLDAP in SFW

Amanda Waite wrote: > Hi there, > > I see that OpenLDAP in SFW has an interface stability of volatile. As > I plan to have Lighttpd consume the OpenLDAP interfaces I would guess > that I need to have an agreement in place with the OpenLDAP owners (as > per OpenSSL). Has anyone else had to tackle

[webstack-discuss] Review: webrev for CR 6775041 and 6775048 (squid)

rahul wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the webrev for CR 6775041 and 6775048 > (a manpage and default config files missing in opensolaris) > at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/6775041.6775048.squid/ > +1

[webstack-discuss] review - cr 6872450 update mod_jk to 1.2.28

rahul wrote: > Hi, > WebRev for updating mod_jk to 1.2.28 is at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vrthra/6872450.jk/ > > May I please get this reviewed? > +1

[webstack-discuss] Review: Fix for CR 6873771 (APR uses Solaris Event Ports incorrectly)

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Please review the webrev for CR 6873771 at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6873771/ +1

[webstack-discuss] Draft Arc case for spawn-fcgi

Amanda Waite wrote: > Hi all, > > Attached is a draft Arc case for spawn-fcgi in SFW. As a reminder, > spawn-fcgi is the component that was part of Lighttpd but is now > distributed as a separate source bundle. >/usr/lighttpd/1.4 > /bin > /

[webstack-discuss] Lighttpd 1.4.23 Arc Case draft and discussion

Amanda Waite wrote: > Hi there, > > Attached is a very early draft of the Lighttpd 1.4.23 Arc Case. There > is an issue that needs to be resolved before I take it forward and it > would be useful to get everyone's input first. > > Lighttpd 1.4.23 no longer includes the spawn-fcgi utility which is

[webstack-discuss] Review: Update httpd to 2.2.13 and other bug fixes

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Hi, > > WebRev for the below fixes is at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6864797/ . > Please review. +1

[webstack-discuss] Lighttpd problems in Webstack 1.5

Peter Karlsson wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Any idea for a ETA of Enterprise Manager on OpenSolaris, looks like > something that would attract potential app deployers to OpenSolaris > and WebStack. And it would make a kick ass demo :) Delivering Enterprise Manager on OpenSolaris is important to us. I

[webstack-discuss] Review : Update APR-Util to 1.3.9

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Hi, > > WebRev for updating APR-Util version to 1.3.9 within > OpenSolaris is at http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6857902/ > Please review. +1

[webstack-discuss] Regd: SUNWmemcached on opensolaris

Eric wrote: > Hi, > > In the getting started guide, it explain ho to start memcached > > http://wikis.sun.com/display/WebStack/Web+Stack+Getting+Started+Guide#WebStackGettingStartedGuide-DistributedCachingwith{{memcached}} > > ... > > In OpenSolaris 2009.06, execute the following command: > > # svc

[webstack-discuss] Review : Update APR to 1.3.8

Seema Alevoor wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to update APR to 1.3.8 within OpenSolaris. > Webrev is at http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6857900/ > Please review. > > Main Changes: > - updated APR source version. > - made changes to use the default gpatch flag (-p0). +1 here If it is not too much tr

[webstack-discuss] Lighttpd problems in Webstack 1.5

Alain Geenrits wrote: > As said in the comments by amanda, we need a clear entry in the Enterprise > Manager section that it is not for OpenSolaris at this time. Will-do. > BTW I think that is not a good decision as most people here are interested in > OpenSolaris for webstack deployment. >

[webstack-discuss] Lighttpd problems in Webstack 1.5

Alain Geenrits wrote: > All, > > I tried twice to install 1.5 in my osol image in Virtualbox. Version is 111b, > official 200906 release with upgrades. > I'd love to close the loop on this so that other people don't try to install Solaris 10 Web Stack 1.5 on OpenSolaris. Did you go through t

[webstack-discuss] Lighttpd problems in Webstack 1.5

Alain Geenrits wrote: > > - It looks like the new Enterprise Manager is dependant on lighttpd. Not > mentionned as far as I could see. What with customers that only want to run > Apache ? > The use of Lighttpd by Enterprise Manager shouldn't be something they have to be aware of except in ve

[webstack-discuss] Lighttpd problems in Webstack 1.5

Amanda waite wrote: > Alain Geenrits wrote: >> Amanda, >> >> Thanks, silly me. I got confused by the doc and the IPS in the >> title... With the release or webstack repos I cannot find the >> Enterprise Manager package. The doc does not explain how to install >> it as far as I can find. Any poin

[webstack-discuss] why did we split apr and apr-util into separate packages ?

Jyri Virkki wrote: > Sriram Natarajan wrote: > >> Hi >> modules like suphp (http://www.suphp.org) is unable to compile out of >> the box because of the way we deliver apr/apr-util. Is there any >> > > How/why exactly? > > What it it relying on? Packaging details don't alter the bits th

[webstack-discuss] unable to compile apache on OSOL2009.11

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > Hi > Just for the record .. > Not sure, what went wrong earlier. I think it was caused by confusion over the compilation tools: C compiler picked up from CC (SunStudio) vs. other tools such as cpp or g++ picked up from PATH. > > Setting my environment to the below confi

[webstack-discuss] Ruby's rbconfig and C++ extensions

Amanda waite wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Amanda Waite wrote: >>> CXX is implicitly set to 'g++' on OpenSolaris boxes when using gmake >>> or /usr/gnu/bin/make. eventmachine calls 'make' and so on >>> OpenSolaris, if /usr/gnu/bin is i

[webstack-discuss] Ruby's rbconfig and C++ extensions

Amanda Waite wrote: > CXX is implicitly set to 'g++' on OpenSolaris boxes when using gmake > or /usr/gnu/bin/make. eventmachine calls 'make' and so on OpenSolaris, > if /usr/gnu/bin is in the PATH and before /usr/ccs/bin it will build > ok without the need to set environment variables. That's wh

[webstack-discuss] Ruby's rbconfig and C++ extensions

"gem install eventmachine" fails on 2009.06 with errors like make I. -I. -I/usr/ruby/1.8/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-solaris2.11 -I. -DBUILD_FOR_RUBY -DHAVE_RB_TRAP_IMMEDIATE -DHAVE_RBTRAP -DHAVE_WRITEV -DHAVE_WRITEV -DOS_UNIX -DOS_SOLARIS8 -DHAVE_OPENSSL_SSL_H -DHAVE_OPENSSL_ERR_H -DWITH_SSL -I/usr/sfw/

  1   2   3   >