What is the use case for that change? Why do need to IModel with
bookmarkable links?
Juergen
-- Forwarded message --
From: SourceForge.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 7, 2005 8:36 AM
Subject: [Wicket-develop] [ wicket-Feature Requests-1350014 ] Add
IModel in BookmarablePageLink
IMHO pages are standing on the borderline between a stateful GUI and the rest
of the application in form of stateless services.
DI should be done by the IoC container, creating the pages can better be done
the standard Wicket way (e.g. with PageParameters).
As described before I'm using a
and you have to have the pages defined as beans in the application context? with their properties specified?
-Igor
On 11/7/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but how does the above handle deserealization of pages? there is nothing to reinject the dependencies.
-Igor
On 11/7/05, [EMAIL
but how does the above handle deserealization of pages? there is nothing to reinject the dependencies.
-Igor
On 11/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO pages are standing on the borderline between a stateful GUI and the rest of the application in form of stateless services.DI
there is already support for page aliasses see ApplicationPages
On 11/4/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to create bookmarkable page without embedding any
of the Wicket implementation details in the url? For example, the
template example page 2 url is:
in 1.2 we will have support for partial rendering
So then you don't need it to wrap around a page.
On 11/6/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I'm doing some AJAX-stuff, and because there is not yet real support ofrendering single components (and having a URL for a Component) I'm
Can you post your solution to help others that have the same problem
thanks
On 11/3/05, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've solved the problem!
Francis
On 11/3/05, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I know with getPages().setPageExpiredErrorPage(Class) I
can
Hello i have a form in my border to do login/logout
I wan to redirect user to same url before login the url that i use
are allways bookmarkable and i wan to mantain the url whith the same
parameters
i thinking in same thing like
void onSubmit()
{
//Form logic goes here
//before is procesed
It is already in CVS HEAD, though not yet accesible through a URL. The
method to call RequestCycle.render(component). It is the first
implementation, so please bare with us if is not perfect yet. Hence,
we appreciate any feedback.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in
Please see the signin2 example.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello i have a form in my border to do login/logout
I wan to redirect user to same url before login the url that i use
are allways bookmarkable and i wan to mantain the url whith the same
parameters
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It is already in CVS HEAD, though not yet accesible through a URL. The
method to call RequestCycle.render(component). It is the first
implementation, so please bare with us if is not perfect yet. Hence,
we appreciate any feedback.
Yep, I have tried that, and I'm
The page must be rendered completly at least once. Thus components can
only be re-rendered. src/test/.../Simple*Test provides some examples.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It is already in CVS HEAD, though not yet accesible through a
To answer you question: components must be attached to a page. This is
required to find the markup. I don't think we are able to support all
different kind of components without an attached page. Think about
Label etc which don't have an attached markup file.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Juergen
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
To answer you question: components must be attached to a page. This is
required to find the markup. I don't think we are able to support all
different kind of components without an attached page. Think about
Label etc which don't have an attached markup file.
Juergen
2005/11/6, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see absolutely nothing wrong with lookups at that level. It's less
code than you would need for any component configuration and it's more
efficient too. And there are just no disadvantages, are there?
The Application class have references to all
On 11/7/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
To answer you question: components must be attached to a page. This is
required to find the markup. I don't think we are able to support all
different kind of components without an attached page. Think about
Not a markup container but a panel (that is besides page the one with there own markup)
should be able to render itself completely standalone.
But maybe i am mistaken? juergen?
On 11/7/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/05, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Juergen
Hi Igor,
I looked through your code. Thanks for implementing it. I am not sure
wheter readObject() is the right place to do the (re)injection. According
to the servlet-spec in SVR 7.7.2 readObject() is not guaranteed to be
called on session-attributes. (Instead session attributes which
And there is also a thing like XML Serialization
Which also doesn't use the java read/write object at all.
On 11/7/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,I looked through your code. Thanks for implementing it. I am not surewheter readObject() is the right place to do the
and you have to have the pages defined as beans in the application context?
with their properties specified?
Yes, I configure most wicket stuff in a separate context, which is bootstrapped
by a custom application factory:
bean class=XYPage singleton=false
property name=service
On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a markup container but a panel (that is besides page the one with there
own markup)
should be able to render itself completely standalone.
But maybe i am mistaken? juergen?
Page and Panel are the only components that could be rendered
Where would I find an example? I could not find any on wiki, wicket.sourceforge.net, or in examples.
The javadoc isnot clear how to use ApplicationPages except that I need to use putClassAlias method. What object, if any, needs reference to the ApplicationPages object with the aliases?
Thanks,
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Are you sure? Usually you render a page and a textbox which provides
autocompletion. Will you ever render the textbox without prior
rendering a page?
Juergen
Well, yes, I could add all those components to my Page, but that can be
few hundred Panels, and that
Hi Igor,
here is something i threw together that solves the deserialization andability
to use the new operator to create pages.
thanks for your work on this.
Regretfully it's still a solution I wouldn't like to use:
IMHO dependency injection should not be done by the object which has the
Well, yes, I could add all those components to my Page, but that can be
few hundred Panels, and that sound like an overkill to construct.
Specially when probably only few of them will ever be rendered.
Not sure I understand your comment. Lets say you have a standard
wicket application with
Maybe RequestCycle.onBegin/EndRequest is what you are looking for?
Juergen
On 11/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
here is something i threw together that solves the deserialization
andability to use the new operator to create pages.
thanks for your work on this.
I dived into the wicket core code and I ended up in
WebComponent.renderHead().
Since I noticed that getBodyOnLoad() was only called for FormComponents
and WebMarkupContainers I expected a difference in renderHead() for
WebComponent and WebMarkupContainer... and I found it.
I guess it would make sense to provide just a single implementation to
be used by both components, avoiding problems while trying to keep
them in sync.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Ruud Booltink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think adding this code to WebComponent's renderHead() would solve this
problem.
what i don´t understand is when i must call redirectToInterceptPage
beacause my sigin panel is allways in the border and documentation
says that continueToOriginal only works with a previous call to
redirectToInterceptPage
On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are redirecting
you may take a look at WebRequestWithCryptedUrl or
WebRequestCrawlerSave as well. They are experimental only, but may
point you into the right direction. Any improvements on this code are
of course wellcome.
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
putClassAlias is close to
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:25:29 +0100, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And there is also a thing like XML Serialization
Which also doesn't use the java read/write object at all.
Does this mean that the readObject is guaranteed to be called on Page
because it is serialized through the
I think with xml sereialization getobject is never called so there we
still have a problem. But i think when the pagemap will deserialize the
page if normal serialization is used then the readobject will be called
on the page.
The serialization closure, i think, reffers to the fact that container
Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the confusion. So readObject()
as you have it in your code is fine.
To get the bean context i simply make my applicationbean implement
applicationcontextaware and then i use
((MyApplication)Application.get()).getBeanContext() static lookup which
works
What i trying to do is maintain the clean url that i have before form submit
i don´t want that my app has not bookmarkable urls wiht path o version in it
On 11/7/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what i don´t understand is when i must call redirectToInterceptPage
beacause my sigin
what interface would you use for the proxy though?
-Igor
On 11/7/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the confusion. So readObject()as you have it in your code is fine. To get the bean context i simply make my applicationbean implement
Hello,I think I've read all of the pertinent articles in the documentation, especially http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Lifecycle. On each request to my app, I first need to run a database query,the parameters of which are dependent on the parameters in the Request. Then I need to
The interface of the setter parameter or of the field type. Of course a
restriction. If you want more you could use cglib (or spring aop). Don't
know.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:27:28 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what interface would you use for the proxy though?
-Igor
On
yeah, i was thinking cglib and extract at runtime
never used cglib before though
that way you just wrap the page with the proxy after you create it and
there is no need to worry about serialization/deserialiation garbage
-Igor
On 11/7/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The interface of
On 11/7/05, Steven McNeel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I think I've read all of the pertinent articles in the documentation,
especially
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Lifecycle. On
each request to my app, I first need to run a database query,the parameters
of which are
Do you mean when you construct the page you do something like
MyPage page = (MyPage) wrapInProxy(new MyPage(..));
and wrapInProxy does create the Proxy and does all the injection?
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:56:23 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
yeah, i was thinking cglib and
yes. but instead of doing the injection right away the proxy would do injection-on-first-access.
that way you get lazy injection and strongly typed pages.
so you would annotate getter functions with the @SpringBean annot, and
the proxy would first call the getter ... if the getter returns null
And you are sure the queries you want to run are page/ component
independent, right? What you are doing is request based, which is
fine, but which is not nescesarily a component based way of doing
things.
Eelco
On 11/7/05, Steven McNeel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I think I've read all
Hello Juergen,
maybe it shouldn't - but currently it does ;).
I debugged the new algorithm of ComponentStringResourceLoader today. As
I already suspected, the id of the validated component is duplicated in
the prefixKey, since both DefaultValidatorResourceKeyFactory and
Hello Igor,
I must object to your statement that my proposed page factory is not IoC:
Nobody says that a Spring context is the only valid container in an
application. The page factory just becomes part of the this logical
container, it is aware of and cooperates with the Sprint context.
That kind of hooks exist. One of our goals for 1.2 is to further
formalize this, and also have better pluggable support for url
handling and state handling. We are getting some ideas on how this
could look, but it is stuff you really have to think through well.
Eelco
On 11/7/05, Sven Meier
On 11/7/05, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Igor,I must object to your statement that my proposed page factory is not IoC:Nobody says that a Spring context is the only valid container in anapplication. The page factory just becomes part of the this logical
container, it is aware of and
then you have to make sure that you always redirect to a bookmarkable url at all places!
(form submits, link clicks)
A form submit will always be a path=x thing
So if that form submit is the page before youre redirectToIntercept
(so a user submits a form but should login first)
Then it will be
I agree. This is how the project im working on right now works. We have
an iwebapplicationfactory that lets spring create the application
object and pulls in all the services in with it. Then a getter in the
page looks something like this:
UserService getUserService() {
It confused me just until 10 minutes ago. I agree with you that it should
be renamed if it is not already a too late.
Christian
I also think it is confusing if not misleading.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:53:16 +0100, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ahh yes i see it
Got confused with
In my current aplication all links are bookmarkables or redirects to a
bookmarkable pagte and i only want this for the SingInForm user that
are not signedin can only access tow forms RegisterForm and SignIn
form the register form redirect allways to a page that show the result
of regitration or
That's right. That's propably the cleanest way and you can use it on each
component.
The problem why I came up with the constructor aproach initially was that
generally all the subcomponents are created and setup in the constructor.
And it would than be IMO more wicket like if you can also
I think there should be both of your implementations.
IMO the constructor based impl should have the protected doInject method,
because to me it seems to be the easiest way to inject manually services
in the constructor without the need to manually proxy them.
Yes with cglib we'll hit the
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
ahh yes, the web2.0 page as the application. ick. maybe we can add
requestcycle.replaceAndRender(Component c) ?
It seems to me that Janne's use-case would be better addressed by allowing
Page.add(Component) and Page.remove(component) at runtime. So, using
AJAX, you
Hi,
I'm seeing this exception when leaving a page via setResponsePage
(concreteOtherPage) from a link component... The markup is alright
and the error is missing something from the markup of the page
which is left at that very moment (I don't even know why wicket looks
at the markup of
thats exactly why i suggest the replace and render. you dont have a problem with markup if you are doing a replace.
-Igor
On 11/7/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote: ahh yes, the web2.0 page as the application. ick. maybe we can add requestcycle.replaceAndRender(Component
It works on my side. I created unit tests and I think they are ok. I
enabled logging for the package and it doesn't happen. I tested the
formInput example and it works without changes. Did you update
AbstractValidator as well?
Juergen
On 11/7/05, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
If you are sure that you are realy not interested in path=xxx, may be
it worth if you create your own WebRequest/WebResponse (see
WebRequestCrawlerSaver for an example what can be done)
Juergen
On 11/8/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my current aplication all links are
It is a redirect you do and the response gets rendered. Based on the
stack trace something is wrong in one of the headers. Within
head/head or wicket:head/wicket:head. In order to track it
down: set a breakpoint at
wicket.markup.html.HtmlHeaderContainer.resolve
(HtmlHeaderContainer.java:196) and
I've got that exception in cases where the generated HTML is not valid
XML. I didn't have time to dig into this but closing the tag with valid
xml, like / or /close solved the problem.
Ralf Ebert wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing this exception when leaving a page via setResponsePage
yes, that is a bug
Juergen
On 11/8/05, Ingram Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I check out latest CVS HEAD, but find strange behavior:
If a MyPage.properties as below:
RequiredValidator = ${label} is required
myForm.bookId = Book ID
then validation message work well and is Book ID is
60 matches
Mail list logo
