If I understand well,
what you want is, say, starting from a big Page, made of only 1 html
markup file and 1 java class, and first start to decompose the big
java class into smaller units (1 Page and 0..n Panels), but still not
decompose the html markup at that time.
And so being able to
that for clarity.
maybe a better way might be to create an InlinePanel class that does not
extend from Panel if we decide to do anything about this.
-Igor
On 1/11/06, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand well,
what you want is, say, starting from a big Page, made
what he expected).
On 1/11/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because border is meant to /wrap/ things not replace them.
-Igor
On 1/11/06, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Euuuhh,
and why not just subclass Border ?
On 1/11/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED
);
}
}
}
public void detach() {
}
}
-Igor
On 1/11/06, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you're on your own for this use case : you need to manage a
presentation model that encapsulate your pure domain model.
Or, you could try to subclass
What about something like an internalRemove() that does everything
needed when the component is removed, but NOT versioning stuff.
And a remove() method, that does call internalRemove() and do the
versioning stuff.
Then the internalRemove() of MarkupContainer could call each
internalRemove() of
catch errors in certain situtations, but obviously caused problems in
others.
i changed it so now the component is removed from its previous parent before
it is added to its new one instead of throwing an error if a parent was
already set.
-Igor
On 12/27/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL
it to the examples.
-Igor
On 12/15/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Would you prefer that I create a module named something like
wicket-contrib-example-strutsnested or
wicket-contrib-strutsnested-demo in wicket-stuff, or
would you like me
to add
Hello,
Would you prefer that I create a module named something like
wicket-contrib-example-strutsnested or
wicket-contrib-strutsnested-demo in wicket-stuff, or would you like me
to add this example to the wicket-contrib-examples existing project ?
The former is one more module at the root, but
Hello Igor,
On 12/13/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not put this strategy [ReuseIfModelObjectsEqualStrategy] in extensions
on purpose.
The reason being is that this can really get you in trouble when dealing with
detachable models.
Imagine changing a page and having all
Igor,
thanks for your answer.
On 12/14/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as far as the models go, maybe what you can do is make a detachable model
that instead of the identity keeps the index of the list. so when you call
getobject() on it it will retrieve that object from the list
Hello,
Is it possible to set a different LinkListener to a Link component,
than the Link component itself ?
Indeed, i can see the Listener interface, but the Link component
registers itself as the Listener.
Thanks in advance,
--
Laurent
---
Hello Johan,
make youre own link implementation
No, sorry, that does not respond to my question.
I see an interface with an onLinkClick().
I wondered if there was a way to give an implementation of this
interface to the Link component instance, instead of doing
subclassing.
I imagine Wicket
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't read Johan's answer well.
On 12/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ILinkListener which Link implements is an IRequestListener which means
that the Link will receive events from the wicket-servlet (quite
indirectly) when the a href/ is clicked in the
On 12/8/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The standard way of wicket is to subclass and implement the onClick or
onSubmit method
But if you want to do it through seperate listeners then yes you need to
subclass link once
so that you can add listeners on it. Just as i subscribed
e)
{
// do youre stuff
}
});
against
wicket.Link = new Link()
{
onClick()
{
// do youre stuff
}
}
johan
On 12/8/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The standard way of wicket is to subclass
Hello,
In order to list and display editable fields for childrens of a bean,
I use a ListView.
An in order to keep track of validation error messages and user
inputs, I carefully call ListView.setOptimizeRemoval(true) on the
ListView instance.
This works well, as long as I don't try to add or
, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you might want to try dataview with ListDataProvider along with
ReuseIfModelsEqualStrategy or your own IItemReuseStrategy. I think it will
make this particular problem easier.
-Igor
On 11/29/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
with ListDataProvider along with
ReuseIfModelsEqualStrategy or your own IItemReuseStrategy. I think it will
make this particular problem easier.
-Igor
On 11/29/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
In order to list and display editable fields for childrens of a bean,
I use
IItemReuseStrategy. I think it will
make this particular problem easier.
-Igor
On 11/29/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
In order to list and display editable fields for childrens of a bean,
I use a ListView.
An in order to keep track of validation error messages and user
/26/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for the info
--
Laurent
On 11/26/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We ask one the java servlet hosts if they would support our open
source project by providing there service to us for free. They did and
ask only
Hello,
This is completely Off Topic, but I know that wicket examples are
hosted somewhere, and the question I was asking to me is : is it
hosted at some kind of free hosting company ?
Such as the plenty PHP hosting we can find in the web ?
One of my friends started a java project in sourceforge,
, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This is completely Off Topic, but I know that wicket examples are
hosted somewhere, and the question I was asking to me is : is it
hosted at some kind of free hosting company ?
Such as the plenty PHP hosting we can find in the web ?
One
On 11/25/05, Johannes Fahrenkrug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I also had a share in pointing it out :)
Yeah, with you pointing the bugs and me suggesting implementation
fixes, that's a good team indeed ;-)
By the way,
it seems that the fix has already been submitted in cvs, thanks to Johan.
will
still get the value of the model (and not re-render the value of the
user input ...).
For Custom Components Developer :
just call in your own onRenderTag() method the
FormComponent.getValue(), just as before.
HTH
--
Laurent
On 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoops
This problem is not only a security problem, but also a bug :
Indeed, please go to the Wicket Examples, and try this: (http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/index.html
)
-enter this in the first textfield of the forminput example : My team's name is Wicket's team
- Then erase the value
, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This problem is not only a security problem, but also a bug :
Indeed, please go to the Wicket Examples, and try this: (http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/index.html
)
-enter this in the first textfield of the forminput example : My team's name
Hello the list,
I think this post is more intended to Johan, as I think I have identified him as the one working on the Form aware things stuff.
I wasbit disappointed that nobody replied to the patches attempts I've submitted on the list.
Now I think this is because my post was lost at the end
the time yet! I will get back to you and others who also where sending patches for these things
And then try to find the best possible solution.johan
On 11/22/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello the list,
I think this post is more intended to Johan, as I think I have identified him
On 11/19/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: when I did the 'custom form processing' I also wanted to call Form.persistFormComponentData() but this is private. Should this be called when Button.defaultFormProcessing = false.
use formComponent.setPersistent(true) instead. Wicket
/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,yet another question concerning PasswordField ?the getModelValue() returns and encrypted version, and the setModelValue()
decrypts it, why ?The idea: prevent access to the plain password by accident. An attemptto make wicket apps secure without any
Please take a look at the patches / new versions of Form
FormComponent that I sent to the list early this week ( see the
Preserve form state thread).
It is what I consider a pretty well formed hack that shows how I supposed form handling could work by default.
It could maybe be done
Hello,
When delving into the code, I found something weird with
PasswordTextField (at least I am founding it weird :-)
Indeed, in the case of the form marked as invalid, when the form is
resubmitted, all the form components show the last user input (and not
the model value), but the password
The password text field, when resetPassword=false, is always
re-rendered with the value of the model ...
On 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When delving into the code, I found something weird with
PasswordTextField (at least I am founding it weird :-)
Indeed
On 11/18/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah. It was a feature.
I don't see the value of that feature, could you explain ?
My point of view :
A user account page, with ability to modify name, address, and password.
All the values of the database are prefilled (including password,
Hello,
yet another question concerning PasswordField ?
the getModelValue() returns and encrypted version, and the setModelValue() decrypts it, why ?
Because it is still possible to get the real value by using
getModelAsString() for example, which is not overriden, so I think it
has not been
);
}
// No validation errors
tag.put(value, getValue());
// Default handling for component tag
super.onComponentTag(tag);
}
You can see here the call to the getValue() method, which will return invalidInput or getModelObjectAsString() as needed.
--AndrewOn 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT
[EMAIL
Thanks a lot for having sent the source code.
I'll check it ASAP (but not before next week, I fear), because I'm
*very* interested in encapsulating the behaviour you're talking about
in a reusable package.
I already have some ideas under the cover, but I'm far to having good
knowledges of Wicket
On 11/17/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
youre SmartForms are just what i described as and Array/List inside a
button
so that a button knows what to valdate when it gets pressed.
Certainly, it is an attempt to generalize this solution. But you're
not fair when you say that it is
On 11/17/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you really want that seperating also in the html?
(with all those spans?)
No, not sure it's what I definitely want, I'm still in the
brainstorming process, as I said.
Looking at youre example and guessing what the smartform (and the
OK, now I have a first attempt to submit.
It is what could be considered as a cleaner way to address Matej's
initial problem.
But it is a hack to the core, so it's normal that I've come up with
something cleaner I think.
And as it's a modification to the core, it's also more error-prone.
It is
Whoops, the missing test files in attachment ... :-)
On 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, now I have a first attempt to submit.
It is what could be considered as a cleaner way to address Matej's
initial problem.
But it is a hack to the core, so it's normal that I've come
Hello,
I had some same interrogations as Matej has ...
I'm currently trying to fully reimplement a complex form made in
struts in wicket, and some buttons of the form are there only to
dynamically add elements to a list (doing a roundtrip with the
server), but don't have to trigger the
Hello,
I personally say. Do that with an in between model. And don't do youre
validation in form-model but in inbetween model-real model
I may be wrong, but this really makes me think we are reinventing
Struts Forms-like beans with this in between model.
Indeed, all input type=text fields
On 11/16/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this also can be completely build into form itself.
But then i think a separation looks/smells better..
But i am open to any idea's !
For me, the problem arises when you have a hierarchical model, and
when you can edit in the same time
Hello,
I think youre usecases can be build now with the current code base.
uc1: that new button should be an immediant button (this is a property) then
the model values are not processed.
By the time, I don't really understand the immediant term, doesn't
seem to be an english term at all
On 11/16/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
The problem is, that I don't want to validate the form, unless user
clicks 'OK'. The model is updated after validation only. But the
'choose' button should NOT validate the form.
I don't think it's a good thing storing the temporary
Hello,
One option is to override Form.process() and compare
findSubmittingButton() against your various buttons, then bypass the
super method if you don't want it to update your model (just return
true). Until wicket has some better way to bypass the model update, this
works just fine.
I
Hello Eelco,
First of all, let's agree that your use case is not a typical one. We
shouldn't make core adjustements that would make things easier for 5%
but harder for 95% of the cases.
Not sure if you're talking about Matej's or mines (a drawback of the
GMail's view ...) ;-)
I still do
Hello,
On 11/7/05, Steven McNeel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I consider this sort of thing as analogous to MVC Front Controller (aka
Dispatcher) logic. I'm basically unclear as to where that logic belongs in
a Wicket app.
The fact is, while I'm still new in the area of Components based web
Hello,
What about something like that:
Use one of the two forms (both could be allowed):
wicket:label key=my.msg.keyA text to render/wicket:label
or
wicket:labelmy.msg.key/wicket:label
Of course, this introduces a new element in the wicket namespace ...
Or something like that:
span
Yes, that's simple and that works, indeed.
Thanks for the idea.
On 11/4/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use wicket:remove around relative paths to the CSS in the webapp
directory. So this looks like:
html
head
style type=text/css src=style/style.css /
wicket:remove
a web server means that java code it is mandatory. Do you
think this is a drawback to Wicket (as well as Tapestry) that claims
that designers and coders can work almost independently?
2005/11/3, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/3/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in order
On 11/4/05, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But anyway, you can preview a component (in isolation) just fine in the
component template without a web server. You can also preview the fake
version in the page template without a server, though it's easy for that
to get out of synch with
Hello,
I don't know how to correctly preview a markup html only when it
refers to css, javascript files, that are meant to be relative to the
webapp context.
I think this should be done by viewing the html markup from a running
instance of the webapp only ?
And also, I'd like to have this
Hello,
I wonder if it is possible to create mutable form components, e.g. for
my application the same administration page is shown but depending on
the rights of the user, an element :
- may be editable ( e.g. rendered as a textarea / TextArea )
- may be read-only ( e.g. rendered as a div /
Great news!
What would you suggest as a temporary solution, as long as 1.2 isn't out ?
On 11/3/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is part of 1.2 and currently under development
Juergen
On 11/3/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I wonder
with an text area and one with just a label
And switch between those panels.
On 11/3/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great news!
What would you suggest as a temporary solution, as long as 1.2 isn't out ?
On 11/3/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
nobody for this one ? ;-)
On 11/3/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I don't know how to correctly preview a markup html only when it
refers to css, javascript files, that are meant to be relative to the
webapp context.
I think this should be done by viewing the html markup
On 11/3/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in order to be pre-viewable the html editor must be able to find the
css file without the help of wicket. The easiest way to accomplish it
is to put the css into your source path and by means of wicket:link
(autolinks) wicket is able to
Hello,
I wonder if it is easily feasible to have functionality like
struts-nested, the struts extension made by the keyboardmonkey team
(
http://www.keyboardmonkey.com/pilotlight/next/Tutorial_partTwo.jsp?content=yesplease
)
This allows to create forms with nested elements : a monkey having
On 11/2/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's easy to do in Wicket. You can nest anyway you want in your
forms, including using listviews (though don't forget to set the
optimizeItemRemoval property to true).
I'll try to redo the struts monkey example in wicket, in order to
/2/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you take a look at wicket-examples already? Compared to what is
explained on the page you pointed to, it is very easy in Wicket and
IMO much more flexibel.
Juergen
On 11/2/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/05, Eelco
postpone any markup/ subcomponent decission until you actually
need it, so this gives you max flexibility (though less
previewability).
Eelco
On 11/2/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I did, but maybe not too deeply I assume.
I'll try and do what I'm thinking of using Wicket
On 10/28/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Wicket also check for direct public property of the same name ?
not yet, but that is easy to build.
That would be great.
Same remark concerning maps vs beans.
If find it great if we don't know if the property is contained in
that i can first check for the expression as a property then
if not found it is map value
(doesn't matter if the key isn't there or not)
johan
On 10/28/05, Laurent PETIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/28/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Wicket also check for direct
have already been thrown by somebody.
My 0.02 EUROS :-)
--
Laurent Petit
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through
Hello,
On 10/27/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AbstractPropertyModel could work with something like a
propertyresolver/ delegate (one more indirection :)) for getting and
setting values based on a expression, and it might even be a good idea
to have the option of having the
67 matches
Mail list logo
