why dont you post that to tss?-IgorOn 12/12/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:I think that not all markup on a page needs to be componentized. When
I look at an administrative interface Topicus is currently developing,I think only 20% or even less of the markup tags has a wicket:idass
I think that not all markup on a page needs to be componentized. When
I look at an administrative interface Topicus is currently developing,
I think only 20% or even less of the markup tags has a wicket:id
assigned. The rest is supporting markup layout (divs, tables,
non-internationalized text), or
Agreed. I think it is still a one-man-only project and the statistics
didn't look too impressive. Which doesn't say anything about the
quality of the framework of course. But it helps to have an active
community like the one that starts growing around Wicket now.
Eelco
>
> 2. No one has heard of
Well, I can tell you two disadvantages of using wingS:1. It uses Layout managers. Why it needs these if it uses HTML is beyond me, but it uses the Swing layout managers. I don't know how many here have used Swing, but coding those layout managers by hand is a horrendous experience, especially the
I don't understand what you mean by duplication. Having things
seperated (in this case markup from logic) is not a violation of DRY.
It is just partitioning and seperation of concerns. And why we do
this? To keep things neatly seperated. Same reason as that you don't
want scriptlets in your JSP (at
I'm still cross posting to the ServerSide, as I'm trying to get the
thoughts of wingS users.
---
Some of the responses mention the separation of concerns: Web page
designers can focus on the usability and beauty of the page, while
Java developers can hook up that page to that application.
I see ad
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 12/11/05, Andrew Lombardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Programmers work in Java, Designers work in HTML, wicket follows the
separation of concerns fairly eloquently.
This is a wrong principle. Modern-day web programming is not a CGI
script + HTML 2.0. Web bro
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I think there are different types of designers... Our company design
team (2 people) use photoshop to create the design, and one of them
transforms that into HTML + CSS + JavaScript for a mockup website.
Well, the first is the creative designer. This guys is drawing t
I think there are different types of designers... Our company design
team (2 people) use photoshop to create the design, and one of them
transforms that into HTML + CSS + _javascript_ for a mockup website. This
is then presented to our customer, and then turned over to the
development team.
We are
On 12/11/05, Andrew Lombardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Programmers work in Java, Designers work in HTML, wicket follows the
> separation of concerns fairly eloquently.
This is a wrong principle. Modern-day web programming is not a CGI
script + HTML 2.0. Web browsers are capable of Javascript, D
Christopher Gardner wrote:
I posted this to the ServerSide in the recent article on wingS. How
would you sell wicket, which requires a physical HTML page, over
wingS, which I think does not?
Well, I'm not quite familiar with wingS, it looks pretty interesting,
but I really enjoy handing ove
clarification below
On Dec 11, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Andrew Lombardi wrote:
Though I've not looked at WingS at all ... I am really enjoying
working with wicket because it feels less like mucking around with
tags (whether xml or xhtml), and more like actual bare-knuckles
programming.
That bei
Though I've not looked at WingS at all ... I am really enjoying
working with wicket because it feels less like mucking around with
tags (whether xml or xhtml), and more like actual bare-knuckles
programming.
That being said, I don't really get a warm fuzzy about having *all*
of my page re
I posted this to the ServerSide in the recent article on wingS. How
would you sell wicket, which requires a physical HTML page, over
wingS, which I think does not?
---
While I've looked at wicket 1.1 very closely, I've only read the
documentation for wingS 2.0. Both intrigue me, and I'm trying to
14 matches
Mail list logo
