Has anyone successfully runned a simple Wicket-portlet inside LifeRay + Tomcat?
I have downloaded the Wicket-portlet-samples from the repository, and
when I try to load the portlet.war with LifeRay + Tomcat I get the
following error:
---
14:59:36,520 ERROR [HotDeployUtil:52]
Dear Janne,
Currently, while starting up with wicket-portlets-exapmles
(successfully running now on LifeRay + Tomcat), the initial webapp we
are developing was started using WebPage, following the reference of
wicket-examples.
But, what about that webapp - based on WebPage - to be integrated in
Agree with Gustavo, Thunderbird is without question a great
thread-oriented mail client, and it's for free. Moreover, you can
carry it all in your memory stick, as achieved with this version:
http://portableapps.com/portablethunderbird
;)
With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling my
mousewheel.
That's a good proposal to forward to Mozilla Thunderbird ORG
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
Hi, Janne,
After satisfactory testing the wicket-portlet-examples (1.x), I
decided to test a part of my webapp, just a few linked pages to test
navigation. So, what I did is just extending from PortletPage, instead
of WebPage. No compilation errors, and also no errors when deploying
the WAR in
/19/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Janne,
After satisfactory testing the wicket-portlet-examples (1.x), I
decided to test a part of my webapp, just a few linked pages to test
navigation. So, what I did is just extending from PortletPage, instead
of WebPage. No compilation errors
:? it already works, since this morning! the issue was auto-solved...
Thank you.
On 9/19/06, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of Wicket are you using? There should work with the current
version from svn?
Janne
On 19.9.2006, at 13.08, Manuel Barzi wrote:
Ok
Forgot to answer this... here it is:
What version of Wicket are you using? There should work with the current
version from svn?
wicket-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
Hi, there,
I am working with I18N and I have an HTML INPUT that has its value
property to be updated to the current locale, but also has to react as
a link when clicking, by means of onClick property.
I do this in wicket-java-side:
--
labelModel = new StringResourceModel(CaocAdminPage-lit-8,
Hi, Igor
what do you mean act as a link when clicked? a button submits the form -
that is its purpose. if you dont want it to submit the form then instead of
using type=submit use type=button and dont use Button but a
webmarkupcontainer that sets the onclick attr to whatever you want.
Yes,
Note that I am using the INPUT(type=button) / BUTTON html element as a
standalone component, not inside a form...
Wait for your answer... hope to come soon. Thanks.
On 9/21/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Igor
what do you mean act as a link when clicked? a button submits
Ok, Igor, I already solved this issue by re-implementing Link class in
my custom LinkButton class, just adding the following snippet
extracted from Button class, and added to the original
onComponentTag Link in this new LinkButton class:
---
// Default handling for tag
Hi, Erik,
If this gets accepted, may I humbly suggest to replace
value != null !.equals(value)
with
value != null value.length() != 0
The latter performs considerably faster (though it is of course still a
micro optimization).
You're right... already updated! Thanks.
Hi, Frank,
You are welcome to submit a patch :)
Yeah, why not... should I enroll wicket-devel to submit this patch,
you tell me...
Thanks.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
really say if what
your doing is something that can be used :)
Frank
On 9/21/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Frank,
You are welcome to submit a patch :)
Yeah, why not... should I enroll wicket-devel to submit this patch,
you tell me...
Thanks
(Btw, SRY is the s---e---x determining Y chromosome... meaning that :?)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT
:) so trivial? then, let it be...
I guess with a global search replace tool, you may
micro-optimize likely a lot of portions of code containing that
non-optimized comparison...
(will try, nevertheless, to submit that patch...)
Submitted and CLOSED.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1562907group_id=119783atid=684975
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
If you could do the actual change and then submit a patch for that change it
will be even faster for us to handle it.
Done...
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
And submit a patch just means attaching the patch to that bug report you
have opened.
Sí, chabón, ya te había entendido... ;)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
and where we just do this .equals(value) without testing for null
i will not rewrite those by first testing null to be able to call for
length.
This is wrong, we never said so. Just meant switching from
[nullability-check] !.equals(value) to [nullability-check]
value.length() != 0... ONLY
He is just saying he doesn't want to rewrite the cases that do not have
a null check.
Very weill, but the question is: whoever promoted that idea? Seems to
be auto-promoted and auto-rejected... ;)
Anyway, have a nice day!
There's also wicket.util.string.Strings#isEmpty
(http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/util/string/Strings.html#isEmpty(java.lang.CharSequence)
to consider...
Just FYI, what people from Apache does (matching Erik's optimization
proposal ;)... I guess wicket does the same.
Sirs... WicketUsersMailingListStackOverflowException: discussion has
branched interesting, but to the infinite ;)
i just checked an 1.3 String implementation and there the same thing was
...
...
-
Take Surveys. Earn
what can i say :) i like performance discussions.. :)
:) That's fine, at the end it's very nutritive...
Yourkit is running constantly on all my java programs that i run/debug on my
laptop..
Good! should try it...
-
Take
Sirs,
Trying to get all WebPages and inner components correctly and
univocally identified (wicket:id), I am using landing in a domain of
long-named wicket:ids as, for instance, CaocAdminPage-checkg-1, to
identify a CheckGroup...
My question is: does long-named wicket:ids affect performance, or
Glad to learn it ;! Thanks, Johan.
I will try to answer it then ;)
i don't think it will affect performance that much but it will increase
memory consumption a bit
and then on both sides with that i mean the static heap (because your html
size is bigger in the markup cache)
and the garbage
;) ha! never give up...
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
you do know that the ids have to be unique only within the same parent
right?
this is perfectly legal
MyPage() {
add(new CheckGroup(group);
WebMarkupContainer c=new WebMarkupContainer(container);
container.add(new CheckGroup(group);
-Igor
Already learnt-by-example, yes. Thank you.
Sirs,
Just for curiosity, wouldn't it be nice to see Work in Progress
samples at Wicket's site, where some of those big slow companies are
brain-gaining to Wicket's productivity?
Haven't seen much information... maybe there's some hidden link there
at wicket's :?
For the moment, if it's of your
Dear Sirs,
Have data list with navigation sortable columns radio buttons to
select - exclusively - rows... as follows:
RadioSel SortRow1 SortRow2
===
(o) data... data...
(o) data... data
the original html has its
Dear Sirs, Janne,
I have a PortletPage with the following composition:
PortletPage Panel Form DataPicker
When testing this View in standalone mode (Wicket WebApp - WebPage),
it works. But when testing it as a portlet in LifeRay Portal, I get
the following error:
Watching the markup generated by the WebPage version, I find that
Wicket does automatically inserts the following scripts to the Page,
in order to provide html-side support for the DatePicker:
head
... blah ...
link href=/nt/caoc.css type=text/css
Dear Janne,
I have detected another issue, and I am not quite sure if it has to be
with Wicket or LifeRay, as I see no exceptions, but I can see a little
detail. I tell you:
I have the following View composition:
Page TabbedPanel Panel[4]
When testing this View in standalone WebPage impl it
...
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
:?
On 10/17/06, 陈小姐 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
您好! 因我司进项较多及受多家企业与公司的委托：将每个月余额的些票据向外提供;
互惠互益以解贵司业务运作`补帐`作帐的燃眉之急;提供如下票据服务:★普通商品/运输/广
告/建筑安装/服务业等各种发票可以向外提供,税率为1-2%；并可上网查询或税务验证后付
款的方式与贵司合作!
联系人:陈小姐
电话 :13510678960
-
hon! da isu zu mit su bi shi kawa zaki dae wo! ya ta... ;)
On 10/17/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's our localization test of the email list ;)
Eelco
On 10/17/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:?
On 10/17/06, 陈小姐 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
您好! 因我司进项较多及受多家企业与公司
Hi, there,
I have the following composition:
WebPage ...
... DataView CustomProvider extends SortableDataProvider
... PagingNavigator DataView
The ERROR? I found is this:
When clicking on any of the navigation buttons (PagingNavigator), my
CustomProvider implementation is managed by Wicket
My question is, nevertheless, would it be a significant implementation
change to swap calls order from to current to iterator(...) first and
size() later? then adding support for both cases in a
SortableDataProvider (Case 1: Big databases - 2 Calls, Case 2: Small
databases - 1 Call)...
From my
subclass that i have shown you, i dont think its a
big deal.
-igor
On 12/5/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, nevertheless, would it be a significant implementation
change to swap calls order from to current to iterator(...) first and
size() later? then adding
there should only be one query to the
database
-igor
On 12/5/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have already followed your sample, doing two queries to database...
;)
On 12/5/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no its not possible there is logic that ties
Hi, Eelco,
I did a short example, a simple (without much complexity, as the
original page has) page2page flow by bookmarkable link, passing 2
parameters, but it's working the right way!? it's not converting
String to String[] parameters.
Strange behaviour... because the phenomenon is actually
Hi, Al,
Construct your page with:
public MyPage(PageParams params) {
Yes, I already do this in all my pages...
You can then go:
String[] colors = params.getStringArray(color);
(Which obviously returns the whole array.)
Or:
String color = params.getString(color);
(Which just returns the
Hi, Jean-Baptiste,
See:
ClassCastException in WebRequestCodingStrategy
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-524
This link is about Apache Wicket Project, but not the Wicket
Standalone Project, which is the currently I am using in my
development. Or is that link valid for both cases?
You may want to try the patch attached to the Jira issue. But
note that this is a workaround, not really a solution to the
problem as I don't know where those String arrays come from.
So, should I better switch back to wicket-1.2.5???
Please, confirm to me what's the best decision
Hi, Johan,
Switching all
... = (String)pageParam.get(...);
to
... = pageParam.getString(...);
made it work.
Why didnt you mention switching to getString before?
Nevertheless, should we understand that get does not behaves as
1.2.5, where String was returned, and not String[1] as 1.2.6.
for example if you did it through:
request.getRequestParameters().getParameters()
then we just return a map which i think we should fix.. (we should return a
ValueMap there)
so that you also can do getString()
Yes, that's the point. Sometimes I was doing this in 1.2.5:
public class the-page
Nothing to say about this, right? the bug still there :(
On 5/23/07, manuel barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am registering exactly the bug registered here:
http://www.nabble.com/--wicket-Bugs-1484321---FileUploadField-clear-after-failed-validation-tf1581602.html#a4292585
that asap.
johan
On 5/24/07, manuel barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing to say about this, right? the bug still there :(
On 5/23/07, manuel barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am registering exactly the bug registered here:
http://www.nabble.com/--wicket-Bugs
make a jira issue for this (if not already there) on the apache side
(wicket
sourceforge bug list got a bit lost)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
Ok, here it is ;)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-596
If you supply patches it'll be fixed more quickly in
Dear Sirs,
When we started using Wicket in our project one of the major
motivation was its support for Portlet implementation.
This week, we have migrated our wicket-implemented WebApp to
PortletApp, asuring there are no compilations errors, and everything
seems to go right.
Now we need to pack
://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=13974local=yquery=portlet+support
On 6/20/07, manuel barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sirs,
When we started using Wicket in our project one of the major
motivation was its support for Portlet implementation.
This week, we have migrated our wicket
52 matches
Mail list logo
