Okay here my little CSS solution for wicket, so if u have had my headache, you can use it. Please if you have more powerful regex approach...teach me please. May not be killer but it works just fine for me.
In your CSS File (textfield.css):.textfieldStyle {
background: url(${myImage});}In your Wi
some typo errors in previous mail:In your CSS File (textfield.css):.textfieldStyle {
background: url(${myImage});}In your Wicket Code:
PackageResourceReference imageRes = new PackageResourceReference(MyPanel.class
, "image.gif");CSSSettings css = new CSSSettings(
MyPanel.class,"textfield.cs
Hello Johan
yeah, this is really strange.
The stacktrace of the exception also doesn't have any wicket classes
or any of my own in it.
But I just see that my custom WebSession implements
IRequestCycleFactory - and I don't know why ;) This is still my first
wicket application, so this might be som
Alternatively, you could use
wicket.util.string.interpolator.MapVariableInterpolator for the
purpose of interpolating.
Also, that extensions thing I mentioned earlier was part of a blog
item I wrote some time ago:
http://chillenious.wordpress.com/2006/05/03/wicket-header-contributions-with-behavio
Hi
What do I need to override in order to populate both
listboxes on construction?
Currently I am giving two models that are filled to
the palette, but only the left side listbox are populated, it seems the right
side ignores the model?
Regards Nino
---
I also want to suggest that Wicket should allow develpers to reuse certain _javascript_ libraries bundled with wicket in extending functionalities. I am not sure if the popular Prototype.js is bundled anywhere in the extensions but a certain resource reference class should be able to deliver the sc
That's pretty easy to do yourself though. See the attachement (unzip)
for an example.
Eelco
On 7/20/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also want to suggest that Wicket should allow develpers to reuse certain
Javascript libraries bundled with wicket in extending functionalities.
The javadoc of the getListItemModel method of the abstract class ListView
states that
"Subclasses may provide their own ListItemModel with extended
functionality. The default ListItemModel works fine with mostly static lists
where index remains valid. In cases where the underlying list changes a
Default the listmodel just stored the index of the list of the ListViewAnd then gets the object from the ListViews list back by that index.But if the list changes the index will return a different object then that ListItem was rendered with.
So what you need to do is replace that index with somethi
Hi I think I might have discovered a bug.
I had a checkbox with some ajax behaviour. On the same page I also had a
panel which had some form components in it, one of the components did also use ajax.
I set visible(false) on the checkbox and 3 things happened
1. checkbox
was n
If a component is not visible (wherever they are) will not render anything.But they shouldn't stop other behaviours that are still visible to render the right contributions.Do you have a testcase?johan
On 7/20/06, Nino Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi I think I might have discove
can you debug it a bit more?Because that method should work fine. It just goes through all the parents of the Link looking if one of them is the container itself.So can't see why that will go wrong.Except of course if the link is somehow getting hold on to when it is displayed in a listview and tha
I want to change visibility attribute of a panel (containing other components) using Ajax. The panel initially is hidden panel.setVisible( false ).When user change selection in a radio group the panel should become visible.
I've tried to do something like that :radio.add( new AjaxFormComponentUpd
the problem is that if the panel is hidden initially it doesnt have its div/span tag with an id attribute in the markup, so the ajax request cannot find the tag to redraw.in situations like this you have to wrap the panel in a webmarkupcontainer, call setoutputmarkupid(true) on it, and target that
Hi, I write a tree component by extending wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. Also I extend the javax.swing.tree.DefaultTreeModel. I have my TreeModel tested in swing. It works fine. However, my tree just show the root node in wicket. What is going wrong? I have my code attached.
Regards,Rice
Tree.jav
When clicking back and forth on links in a fast, repetitive manner, the following error occurred. Note, I'm not sure what the onNewBrowserWindow() call is all about, this was all done from a single browser window and no new window open was triggered from the app.
Also, what conditions can tri
Apologies for another basic Wicket question...
I understand (mostly) how the Wicket model approach works with respect
to components and such. However, how do I retain values from one page
view to the next?
I know that I could use PageParameters, but the object I want to retain
in a complex objec
all you have to do is pass the reference of the old page to the new pageclass ListUsersPage extends Webpage { . add(new Link("edit") { onclick() { setResponsePage(new EditUserPage(
ListUsersPage.this, (User)getModelObject())); }}class EditUserPage extends WebPage {
Of course it would have to be that simple...
Thanks!!
Dave
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 19:33 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> all you have to do is pass the reference of the old page to the new
> page
>
> class ListUsersPage extends Webpage {
> .
> add(new Link("edit") {
> onclick
Hi, I find that the implementation of Wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree is not suitable for big tree. It seems because it depends on javax.swing.tree.DefaultMutableTreeNode
too much, which asks for populating the whole tree before rendering Wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. For my case, the tree is very b
I was supposing that but I would like to have a simpler structure avoiding to add unuseful container. My idea is to hide the component using a simple css class or style display: none.I think it should possible using an AttributeModifier but I don't know how to override the default visibility mechan
i dont think what you are thinking about is a very clean solution.if you want to avoid an extra container do this:instead of initially adding the component and setting visible to false add an EmptyPanel, then instead of making your component visible create an instance and replace the panel with it.
I also have a very big tree, and it works just fine.
The secret is to load only the data that is displayed. You need to
override the Tree class (it is made for this) and implement it so that
only the required data is loaded.
Good luck!
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 13:46 +0800, Rice Yeh wrote:
> Hi
As an additional note:
Actually, I needed to load the data one level lower than what was
displayed, otherwise the junction images (with the + signs) were not
displayed correctly.
Cheers,
Dave
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 15:50 +0900, David Leangen wrote:
> I also have a very big tree, and it works
24 matches
Mail list logo
