While on this concept of modelling Wikidata items for multi-concept
Wikipedia pages, I would like to remind you of another case, in which
cross-project spam is deleted in only a subset of language Wikipedias,
leaving a few links or just the Wikidata item. I would like there to be
some trace of the
Me again. After some coffee and digesting the edit that Eric made to
address the Samoan Clipper issue, I can see several (better?)
alternatives to my first proposal. This also takes into account some
comments of James, Mohamed, and Purodha.
I can see three patterns to solve such issues:
== (
On 09.09.2014 14:23, Emw wrote:
...
Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samoan_Clipper
See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7409943 for an initial pass at
modelling that.
Thanks, that's a huge improvement over the previous state (=me looking
at the article and giving up on adding anyth
The language links should then go to either the composite item, or the specitic
item, if only one exits for a language.
What, if there are both? If the page itself is specific, choose specific one,
else use the composite one.
That may intrduce some foggyness because links are unequal and you do
What are the implications of this for sidebar links ?
IMO it's a good thing if the wikidata items become more fine-grained and
more conceptually precise.
But wouldn't this mean we would be losing (some) sidebar links, so
people wouldn't necessarily know any more that some of the information
>
> For articles that are really about multiple different things that cannot
> be reconciled in a single natural concept:
>
> * State "intance of:Wikipedia article with multiple topics" (we already
> have several other classes of Wikipedia articles).
> * Use some property, say "has topic", to link
2014-09-09 13:36 GMT+02:00 Markus Krötzsch :
> My proposal became more clear to me over lunch:
*** cut ***
Markus, "yuo are of genius!" (cit.) :)
/me deletes straight away his own proposal
L.
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Dear all,
A notable side effect :
At the moment, a page can contain multiple topic in few languages only
At the moment, those page are "adopted" by one of the topic
It means that from now on, some pages that contains multiple topics in some
languages will be attached to new Q** and it will appe
Am 09.09.2014 13:36, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
> My proposal became more clear to me over lunch:
>
> For articles that are really about multiple different things that cannot be
> reconciled in a single natural concept:
>
> * State "intance of:Wikipedia article with multiple topics" (we already hav
My proposal became more clear to me over lunch:
For articles that are really about multiple different things that cannot
be reconciled in a single natural concept:
* State "intance of:Wikipedia article with multiple topics" (we already
have several other classes of Wikipedia articles).
* Use
On 09.09.2014 11:47, Thomas Douillard wrote:
The composite item seems to be a sort of composite geographical/human
system, like an ecosystem (community of living organisms together with
the nonliving components of their environment)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q37813 a special kind of ecosystem
On 09.09.2014 11:33, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
Am 09.09.2014 01:40, schrieb Denny Vrandečić:
Create a third item in Wikidata, and use that for the language links. Any
Wikipedia that has two separate articles can link to the separate items, any
Wikipedia that has only one article can link to the sing
The composite item seems to be a sort of composite geographical/human
system, like an ecosystem (community of living organisms together with the
nonliving components of their environment)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q37813 a special kind of ecosystem maybe ...
2014-09-09 11:33 GMT+02:00 Daniel K
Am 09.09.2014 01:40, schrieb Denny Vrandečić:
> Create a third item in Wikidata, and use that for the language links. Any
> Wikipedia that has two separate articles can link to the separate items, any
> Wikipedia that has only one article can link to the single item.
That's a nice solution for the
Disambiguation? In Openstreetmap it makes total sense to have 2 items for
these very different concepts.
Jo
2014-09-08 23:04 GMT+02:00 Edward Betts :
> The Wikipedia article about Wangerooge describes an island and
> municipality.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wangerooge
>
> These two concep
The Wikipedia article about Wangerooge describes an island and municipality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wangerooge
These two concepts, island and municipality, have discrete items.
Municipality: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25135
Island: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17081143
I would lik
16 matches
Mail list logo
