Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread Peter Southwood
No, but presenting an appearance of surprise is a bit disingenuous. P - Original Message - From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:10 PM Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA On 31 July 2013 21:47,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread Peter Southwood
And non-western countries probably go further if their technological capacity allows it. If you are not being spied on by somebody it is because no-one could be bothered or they havent got around to it yet, not because any law protects your privacy. P - Original Message - From: Nathan

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk about VisualEditor

2013-08-01 Thread Steven Walling
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Kevin Wayne Williams kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com wrote: If you had followed that, and understood that the Minimum Viable Product included cut-and-paste, table editing, and maybe the ability to successfully and completely edit the hundred or so most edited

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread Peter Southwood
Does the law actually require them to lie about data demands when questioned? P - Original Message - From: Nathan nawr...@gmail.com To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 1:52 AM Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA On Wed, Jul 31, 2013

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread Peter Southwood
Thanks, This answers my question. P - Original Message - From: Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:13 AM Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Michael Snow

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread rupert THURNER
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote: On 01/08/13 14:15, Anthony wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Ryan Lane rl...@wikimedia.org wrote: I would be fired and jailed before I knowingly let that occur. If this was the case I'd very surely not be

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk about VisualEditor

2013-08-01 Thread Erik Moeller
Hey Kevin, contrary to your belief (and in spite of your desire to blame me ;-), I actually have a ton of respect for the opinions you've expressed throughout the process, and for the level of detail and time you've committed to it, including helping in a hands-on manner. I don't agree with you

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk about VisualEditor

2013-08-01 Thread Robert Rohde
If we are going to discuss Minimal Viable Product, then we might want to take note of the line in the Wikipedia article that says: The product is typically deployed to a subset of possible customers, such as early adopters that are thought to be more forgiving, more likely to give feedback, and

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread Robert Rohde
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org wrote: As a quick reminder here, before any conspiracy theories about orders and data retention get out of control: 1) We've flat-out denied any sort of involvement in this, and we continue to stand by that denial:

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread George Herbert
The letters must be sent to the organization rather than an individual. The idea of going to an individual employee and strongarming them may happen, but the law around NSLs is specific. The court cases to date indicate that if an individual employee got a US NSL and sued over it, the judge

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread Emilio J . Rodríguez-Posada
It is funny (but also sad) to see how people thought that Internet privacy was respected in Western world. Almost 99% only worried about China/Iran Internet monitoring and censorship but we had here the most comprehensive spy system logging every site you read. Wake up!

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Changes at the Wikimedia Foundation Fundraising Team

2013-08-01 Thread Zack Exley
Thanks everyone - I learned and grew a lot here thanks to all of you. Now Lisa, Megan, Sara, Katie and the whole fundraising team are going to take it up to a whole new level of efficiency and brilliance. I'm excited about my next gig -- not yet announced, but not a secret -- which is going back

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.orgwrote: On 01/08/13 14:15, Anthony wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Ryan Lane rl...@wikimedia.org wrote: I would be fired and jailed before I knowingly let that occur. If this was the case I'd very surely not be

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk aboutVisualEditor

2013-08-01 Thread Peter Southwood
This may be a stupid question, but is it possible to put a label into a complicated template which will simply prevent VE from trying to edit it? P - Original Message - From: Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Thursday,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk about VisualEditor

2013-08-01 Thread Erik Moeller
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Kevin Wayne Williams kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com wrote: The editor was able to change a 4 to a 5 in an existing table, that's true. Could that editor add a row? No. Add a column? No. Delete a row or a column? No. Are all of those operations part of the bare minimum

Re: [Wikimedia-l] NSA

2013-08-01 Thread Ryan Lane
On Thursday, August 1, 2013, Anthony wrote: On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.orgjavascript:; wrote: On 01/08/13 14:15, Anthony wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Ryan Lane rl...@wikimedia.orgjavascript:; wrote: I would be fired and jailed

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Invitation to WMF July 2013 Metrics Activities Meeting: Thursday, August 1, 18:00 UTC

2013-08-01 Thread Praveena Maharaj
REMINDER: This meeting starts in 30 minutes. On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Praveena Maharaj pmaha...@wikimedia.orgwrote: Dear all, The next WMF metrics and activities meeting will take place on Thursday, August 1, 2013 at 6:00 PM UTC (11 AM PDT). The IRC channel is #wikimedia-office on

Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF 2013 elections post-mortem

2013-08-01 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Anders Wennersten, 31/07/2013 09:18: As Bishakha I believe time now is ripe to strengthen the election process and that we should aim for a standing committee. In the same time I think it would be good to look into this group a bit further (technical support, how to elect the committee, split

[Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Rui Correia
Dear Colleagues at the Foundation I just came across an artecle called White Africans of European ancestry. What is that even supposed to mean? Who would be any other white people if not of Europen ancestry? What other white people (yes, WP has a definition of white people could these be?

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Fred Bauder
Dear Colleagues at the Foundation I just came across an artecle called White Africans of European ancestry. What is that even supposed to mean? Who would be any other white people if not of Europen ancestry? The Ainu people, not that it matters. Fred

[Wikimedia-l] Disinformation regarding perfect forward secrecy for HTTPS

2013-08-01 Thread James Salsman
With the NSA revelations over the past months, there has been some very questionable information starting to circulate suggesting that trying to implement perfect forward secrecy for https web traffic isn't worth the effort. I am not sure of the provenance of these reports, and I would like to see

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Denny Vrandečić
Rui, if your basic assumption is that Wikipedia will never be a real encyclopedia because of the lack of diversity among its contributors, I would like to know of any other encyclopedia that is anywhere close to the diversity among its contributors that Wikipedia has (just a side-note, the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Mark
On 8/1/13 10:22 PM, Rui Correia wrote: So, just because there isn't an artice about Khoi people living in Denmark is no reason to not have an article about White Europens of Europen descent livng in Patagonia or White Europens of Europen descent livng in Timbaktu. We have allowed ourselves to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Rui Correia
Denny If you going to shoot me down as a troll, then I can say only that you are one of those that refuse to see the elephant in the room. I am a journalist (and a journalism trainer), I know that if I want others to read what I have to say I need to come up a headline that will attract

[Wikimedia-l] Open call for Individual Engagement Grant proposals and committee members

2013-08-01 Thread Siko Bouterse
Hi all, The Wikimedia Foundation and the Individual Engagement Grants Committee invite you to submit proposals for grants of up to $30,000 to support 6-month projects that improve the Wikimedia community. These grants fund individuals or small teams to organize, build, create, research or

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Rui Correia
Denny PS: Your email is a typical case of shooting the messenger. I have seen far too often that we seem to prefer that we don;t see the elephant in the room. What happens to emails such as mine? Nothing. They get flushed down the gutter of electronic waste. There are so many bodies within the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Asaf Bartov
Your disqualification of Wikipedia from being called an encyclopedia is, of course, equally (indeed, more) applicable to _all other encyclopedias, ever_. It is therefore incumbent on your to either agree that there has never been an encyclopedia yet, or that your bar for what constitutes an

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Laura Hale
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Rui Correia correia@gmail.com wrote: Can you honesty tell me that you have not come across articles that are 'untouchable'? That you know they convey a view that is not entirely right, but YOU and I cannot change it? Can you tell me that you have not come

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Rui Correia
Asaf So you mostly agree with m, but prefer to come out knee-jerking first and only after that showing that you somehow agree. The elephant in the room is so big that we there isn't even enough room to breathe properly to get enough oxygen to our brains. Rui On 1 August 2013 23:10, Asaf Bartov

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread David Gerard
On 1 August 2013 22:19, Rui Correia correia@gmail.com wrote: So you mostly agree with m, but prefer to come out knee-jerking first and only after that showing that you somehow agree. No, he's saying you're full of it, because you are. Under your definition, there has never been an

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Rui Correia
Laura If this is a VERY VERY important topiic, as you put it, then why don't YOU help, instead of joingng the knee-jerking squad? If you agree that it is a very important topic and you are apparenly a better journalist that me, why don't you do a better job rather than attacking the messenger?

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Rui Correia
David I am glad to see to see that so far everybody agrees with me, just nobody can see the forest for the trees and most prefer to demonstrate how offended they feel at my pointing out how naked the emperor is. So, whereas I write complete rubbish, what do you do to fight systemic bias [which]

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread George Herbert
Let me pose a set of questions - 1; Do you feel this is systemic bias in people not wanting some articles? 2; and/or, do you feel this is systemic bias in people not having yet reached creating some articles? 3; and/or,!do you feel this is systemic bias in lack of depth of coverage in

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Rui Correia
George Thank you for your interest. It is a systematic bias in not wanting some POVs. Which is why we got to the point that we have a whole encyclopaedia governing the issue of POV. I think a better answer to your question would be provided by doing an analysis of articles with a high rate of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread George Herbert
The specific examples you started with are not to my knowledge problem POVs - unless one of the White Power groups showed up while I wasn't paying attention. It would seem much more of the not gotten there yet or not (yet) well covered in reliable sources for the specific ones. Am I

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Oona Castro
I rarely jump in controversial topics here in Wikimedia-l, but I've decided to share my 2 cents today. I sign up for what Laura Hale said on facts data based support for such a claim, but would like just to add a question: * what does a real encyclopedia look like? While I do see Rui Correia's

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

2013-08-01 Thread Denny Vrandečić
Rui, as others are trying to tell you in this thread, I do not consider the manner you are raising this topic to be helpful or constructive, and I don't think that your continued defense of your approach will help or get us anywhere. Whereas anecdotal war stories as the one you describe can be

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Disinformation regarding perfect forward secrecy for HTTPS

2013-08-01 Thread Ryan Lane
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:33 PM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote: With the NSA revelations over the past months, there has been some very questionable information starting to circulate suggesting that trying to implement perfect forward secrecy for https web traffic isn't worth the

[Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] The Signpost -- Volume 9, Issue 30 -- 31 July 2013

2013-08-01 Thread Wikipedia Signpost
Op-ed: The VisualEditor Beta and the path to change http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-07-31/Op-ed News and notes: Gearing up for Wikimania 2013 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-07-31/News_and_notes Featured content: Caterpillars,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Disinformation regarding perfect forward secrecy for HTTPS

2013-08-01 Thread James Salsman
Ryan Lane wrote: ... Assuming traffic analysis can be used to determine your browsing habits as they are occurring (which is likely not terribly hard for Wikipedia) The Google Maps example you linked to works by building a huge database of the exact byte sizes of satellite image tiles. Are you

[Wikimedia-l] The Global Economic Map is looking for somebody with experience making bots

2013-08-01 Thread Alex Peek
The top goal for the Global Economic Map right now is to make bots that will create empty articles for every country and region. I think this would be a good first step right now. Here is an empty article for spain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcnabber091/sandbox/Economic_Summary_of_Spain

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Disinformation regarding perfect forward secrecy for HTTPS

2013-08-01 Thread Ryan Lane
On Thursday, August 1, 2013, James Salsman wrote: Ryan Lane wrote: ... Assuming traffic analysis can be used to determine your browsing habits as they are occurring (which is likely not terribly hard for Wikipedia) The Google Maps example you linked to works by building a huge database