That's great! I'm not complaining about the list of voters being made public (I
actually support this!). I'm just pointing out that this wasn't made clear when
votes were being cast. Something to improve next time around?
Thanks,
Mike
On 3 Jun 2015, at 23:31, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
small
in my humble opinion, what's the big deal?
we usually vote openly in the projects
and everything bad/great about this or that user is revealed really openly
(sometimes too openly, but well... nothing to be done here)
it is our own decision whether to vote and how to vote, isn't it?
/small
On 3 Jun 2015, at 23:48, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 18:42, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
By the way, my understanding is that the practice of generating a public
list of voters who cast ballots, while keeping the nature of their votes
private, is
On 3 June 2015 at 19:11, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
On 3 Jun 2015, at 23:48, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 18:42, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
By the way, my understanding is that the practice of generating a
public
list of voters who
By the way, my understanding is that the practice of generating a public
list of voters who cast ballots, while keeping the nature of their votes
private, is relatively common in election processes in general. In the
United States, political parties use this information for their get out
the
OK, just ones off hand that are already filed phab tickets for:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T57007
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66835
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66833
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T59995
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T57881
And honestly your response
On 3 June 2015 at 12:32, Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se wrote:
As a number-crunching nerd myself I would love all my fellows with this
interest to also be able to study the detailed numbers. But in order to keep
secrecy of who voted, the figures for small project can not be made
On 2015-06-01 11:17, Anders Wennersten wrote:
Just a clarification on numbers
In James (internal) table enwps share of total number of eligible
votes is 35,4%
Participation rate state from enwp was 8,26% against mean for all
9,5%. If enwp is excluded the participation rate for all of the rest
While the total number of eligible voters is reliable (and also made
general available), the breakdown of numbers by project is much less
reliable, of the reason you bring up. And for the small, and even more
the very small projects, the numbers could even be said to be unreliable.
For us in
That's correct. The list of voters remains public, just not how
individuals voted. In this way we can work out who is openly
male/female, if they have a declared country of residence, if they are
associated with chapters or other groups etc.
Fae
On 3 June 2015 at 12:42, Andrew Gray
On 3 June 2015 at 13:26, Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se wrote:
...
This is new information for me. We have had a similar but extended list like
this to have as base for vote checking. But I am not aware it will be
generally available.
At the start this year we discussed what type
Andrew Gray skrev den 2015-06-03 13:42:
I might be misremembering, but I thought that whether or not user X
had voted was public information? It certainly was in 2013; digging
through old emails turns up a link to
https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/290 which
seems to be
Can you name one?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:02 AM John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is something that the pywiki devs need to fix in compat. Please dont
give me shit about moving to core. I have yet to have it not fatally error
out in less than 10 minutes of using it. There are still
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru
wrote:
On 2015-06-03 17:42, Raymond Leonard wrote:
Folks,
At the link, you can find
List votes: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015
https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/512
Yours,
Folks,
At the link, you can find
List votes: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015
https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/512
Yours,
Peaceray
--
peace...@cascadia.wiki
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 13:26, Anders
On 2015-06-03 17:42, Raymond Leonard wrote:
Folks,
At the link, you can find
List votes: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015
https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/512
Yours,
Peaceray
--
Thank you. I am indeed listed as voting from Meta, where I barely
Nathan skrev den 2015-06-03 18:16:
What does it indicate if a vote record is displayed in gray instead of
black?
A vote that was recast later
Anders
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Hello,
The next office hour of the Wikimedia Language Engineering team (now part
of Editing) is scheduled for next Wednesday, June 10th at 14:30 UTC.
However, this time instead of only IRC we are hosting it as an online
discussion over Hangout/Youtube. Given the limitation of Google Hangouts,
18 matches
Mail list logo
