That's correct. The list of voters remains public, just not how
individuals voted. In this way we can work out who is openly
male/female, if they have a declared country of residence, if they are
associated with chapters or other groups etc.

Fae

On 3 June 2015 at 12:42, Andrew Gray <andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
> On 3 June 2015 at 12:32, Anders Wennersten <m...@anderswennersten.se> wrote:
>
>> As a number-crunching nerd myself I would love all my fellows with this
>> interest to also be able to study the detailed numbers. But in order to keep
>> secrecy of who voted, the figures for small  project can not be made general
>> available. And to work with the figures from the bigger and medium projects,
>> probably a more qualified analysis of the quality of the numbers used would
>> be needed, just along the reasoning you bring up.
>
> I might be misremembering, but I thought that whether or not user X
> had voted was public information? It certainly was in 2013; digging
> through old emails turns up a link to
> https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/290 which
> seems to be the voter list from that election.
>
> Andrew.
-- 
fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to