Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread Tito Dutta
(I won't make this personal and this is *not* to *anyone* or about any past incident in specific.) But I second Legoktm on this. That was surprising to me as well. We have pages and essays on Wikipedia such as * IPs are human too ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPs_are_human_too), * Arbs

Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread Kunal Mehta
Hi Pine, On 2020-06-05 00:29, Pine W wrote: > I don't know what all was going on inside of WMF, but I would have > wanted an outsider -- that is, not someone inside of WMF -- to review > the actions of the staff, similar to how police departments are > sometimes reviewed by outside agencies after

Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread RhinosF1 -
Thanks for offering to answer questions. I asked one but couldn't log onto Zoom due to being busy. Do we know when notes of the hour will be out? Samuel/RhinosF1 On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 08:30, Pine W wrote: > Agreed that office hours are a nice idea, although > > 1. For privacy reasons,I don't

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Early thoughts regarding a global code of conduct and a GCC committee

2020-06-05 Thread Aron Manning
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 21:43, Pine W wrote: > Hello, > This topic has been in the back of my mind for awhile. > Your proposal was thought-provoking. I was about to share my thoughts on it for a long time: First, I think there are 3 aspects to the discussion on the CoC: 1. The values and

Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread Ad Huikeshoven
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:17 AM Aron Manning wrote: > It doesn't answer any of your questions, but I've just stumbled upon this > and thought you might be interested: 2019 Governance Review > < >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread Aron Manning
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 09:30, Pine W wrote: > 1. For privacy reasons,I don't think that they need to be on video. > Sue had them on IRC. In the Wikimedia Cafe several of us use audio > only. > It was great to have it in person. Conferencing is a great opportunity to have a more humane experience

Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread Anders Wennersten
I agree. youtube  (+zoom) and chat worked very well. I still had problem follow all that being said, and would like the "black" notice to have been used more and show (just a few seconds) the question being discussed. And besides applauds for Maggie being straight forward, I also want to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread Ciell Wikipedia
Hi Pine, 1) For me, as non-native speaker, it really helps to see someone speak while I am hearing them. I applaud Maggie for doing this on screen. There is no need for recording, but the streaming really adds to my understanding of what is being said. 2) Though I realise that it may be a case

Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread Pine W
Agreed that office hours are a nice idea, although 1. For privacy reasons,I don't think that they need to be on video. Sue had them on IRC. In the Wikimedia Cafe several of us use audio only. 2. I'm digesting what Maggie said about the incidents of last July. I'm not sure that the version of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] June 4 1800 Maggie Dennis office hour (with a twist)

2020-06-05 Thread Natacha Rault via Wikimedia-l
Yes thank you very much. I really liked the sincerity and the straight to the point amswers. It feels great to be listened at and given sincere answers. Make this call a best practice, it rocked. Warm regards, Nattes à chat Envoyé de mon iPhone > Le 4 juin 2020 à 22:16, Tito Dutta a