On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 5:03 AM Chris Keating
wrote:
> My concern over this specific instance is prompted by several things:
Thanks for laying out these concerns very clearly, Chris! I'll
reiterate that, above all, my own biggest concern here is that
governance standards of the movement should
Dear all,
Today's Global Conversations were about the composition, the selection, and
compensation of members for a Movement Charter Drafting Committee.
To move forward, convergence of opinions on the different proposals is
necessary. So far there are four proposals:
1. A proposal by Pharos (the
I am just forking this thread so the title reflects the needed discussion
and we avoid derailling again to non directly / personal topics.
Le dim. 27 juin 2021 à 9:55 PM, Katherine Maher
a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> Leaving aside everything else for a minute, I want to reply to Maggie’s
>
Hi folks,
Leaving aside everything else for a minute, I want to reply to Maggie’s
statement regarding the T case here. As someone with direct and specific
knowledge of the issue, I feel responsibility to affirm Maggie’s version of
events.
Although we provided notice to the board that we were
Dear Maggie (& everyone)
Thank you for this email. I really feel that you should not have had to write
this. I feel that the personal reference in an earlier mail (on this thread) to
Maria and her partner was inappropriate and detracted from the discussion. But
thank you for taking the
Hi, everybody.
It’s Sunday, and there’s a lot of meetings today, and I wrestled with
whether to say this without necessarily having the full time to think about
all the ways I could say it wrong and potentially make misunderstandings
worse. We’re having a meeting on Tuesday specifically to
Hoi,
First, I am a candidate for the board of the Wikimedia Foundation. I have
taken time to see what people say, not react immediately.
For María to become a consultant, I am of two minds. She is probably best
placed to support the implementation of the strategy as defined. With both
the
"founding a user group or chapter (the latter is pretty unlikely
nowadays), applying
for a grant proposal and being hired by your colleagues as the first staff
member of the user group you founded would be something totally legal, just
lacking any ethical or moral compass." - I believe you are
Adding to Chris' points, I would also like to illustrate the point where in
the future, founding a user group or chapter (the latter is pretty unlikely
nowadays), applying for a grant proposal and being hired by your colleagues
as the first staff member of the user group you founded would be
>
> I will note that, as Chris pointed out, even WMUK's current policies
> would permit a transaction like the one we're discussing if approved
> by the Board ("no trustee may _without the consent of the board_"
> [8]), and Wikimedia Austria's Good Governance Kodex would permit it if
> approved by
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 4:47 PM Erik Moeller wrote:
At least in my understanding, this thread conflates a good practice
> (waiting periods) with violations of COI policies. As I understand it,
> WMF adhered to its existing COI policy through the usual measures
> (recusal & resignation from the
11 matches
Mail list logo
