How would superprotect be used in a legal situation and how would that be
different from any other way that community and WMF have found to deal with
that without the tool in the past? Can somebody provide a hyphotethical
example please?
Is WMF willing to discuss with community how superprotect
On 12 August 2015 at 10:11, Bohdan Melnychuk wrote:
I would trust such tool only in hands of stewards, not WMF
--
I can not remember when I last saw a steward action on the En WP.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
On 12 August 2015 at 19:46, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
In case of a legal situation. Taking a position like superprotecting
means that you take on a liability. When you do this as part of a job, it
is different from doing it as a volunteer.
--
The only difference I can understand is
On 13 August 2015 at 06:51, Lucas Teles wrote:
How would superprotect be used in a legal situation and how would that be
different from any other way that community and WMF have found to deal with
that without the tool in the past? Can somebody provide a hyphotethical
example please?
Is
That sounds reasonable.
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:14:58 -0700
From: wiki.p...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect's first birthday
My preference would be to have stewards applying Superprotect rather than
WMF. There are cases where
On 12 August 2015 at 14:41, Bohdan Melnychuk bas...@yandex.ru wrote:
... It has a trail of bad usage it is connected with. ...
I'm not sure I agree with that. There are two known uses. The first one,
where a software tool was locked in over the consensus of the community was
a bad usage I'll
We all know for what the tool was initially created. I am not sure if it
is ethically okay to keep status quo. Maybe it is time to move on and
remove the tool or to start a RFC to see if the community want the tool?
:-)
Not advocating - just some thoughts and either way here... :)
Regards,
Hoi,
In case of a legal situation. Taking a position like superprotecting
means that you take on a liability. When you do this as part of a job, it
is different from doing it as a volunteer. Insisting on having this done by
stewards means insisting on their vulnerability..
Thanks,
GerardM
