Hey Everyone,
I wanted to send a quick reminder that on Tuesday, 27th November, at 16:00
UTC, we will launch our mobile and banner campaigns. We expect to run the
fundraising campaign on English Wikipedia in 6 countries: USA, Canada, UK,
Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand. You may notice some fin
History does not require a judge. It's the storiography to be judge.
Here the problem is to give relevance to some sources and to neglect
(completely) others.
If a single not neutral source is considered as the Holy Bible, the same
pillars of Wikipedia are infringed.
Kind regards
On Mon, 26 Nov
I think that this case is so complicated that the admin or the steward
sometimes are not prepared to face a big problem like this.
They evaluate two opinions without having a background to define what is
true and what is not. In this case the evaluation can be not neutral.
Anyways the bias us pre
Who is the judge? Are we going to join Facebook, Google, Twitter, et al as
the new press barons?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New me
Since no one is pure we should accept and embrace intolerant and hateful
propaganda in Wikimedia projects? Is that the argument you are making,
Dennis?
Chico Venancio
Em seg, 26 de nov de 2018 09:55, Dennis During It's a good thing that our thoughts and deeds are so pure that we have
> become en
It's a good thing that our thoughts and deeds are so pure that we have
become entitled to purify the thoughts and deeds of others.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wik
I can't find a more formal way to word this message, so I'll hope something
along the lines of a word vomit essay is alright.
I think a major part of the problem you brought up is a lack of easily
accessible resources to get involved. Sure, Meta tells users *how to get on
mailing lists*, but there
This mailing list is usually positive, but we need to talk about
something rotten. I was linked to this Meta RfC by my Russian colleague:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Administrator_abuse_on_the_Croatian_Wikipedia
The author and commentators, with notable evidence, allege
Dear all,
As a step forward to increase community participation in the user group
activities, the Wikipedia & Education User Group is organising logo
challenge to invite Wikimedians (even non-Wikimedians) to design and
nominate a new logo for the newly formed user group. The nomination period
star
Correction: Nomination period starts from tomorrow i.e. 23 November 2018,
and ends on 16 December 2018.
In the earlier email it was mentioned as 2019. Sorry for the confusion.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_%26_Education_User_Group/Logo_challenge
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:21 P
10 matches
Mail list logo