On 7 February 2014 04:04, Samuel Klein wrote:
> That's just beautiful. Thank you, Fae & Faebot.
>
> I see that job filtered for mobile uploads without EXIF data.
> What obstacles do you envision for running such a service for all images?
>> https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Faebot/Sandbox
That's just beautiful. Thank you, Fae & Faebot.
I see that job filtered for mobile uploads without EXIF data.
What obstacles do you envision for running such a service for all images?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Fæ wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2014 22:40, "Samuel Klein" wrote:
> ...
>> Are we doing a
On 6 Feb 2014 22:40, "Samuel Klein" wrote:
...
> Are we doing any commons analysis like this at the moment?
> Is any similarity-analysis done on upload to help uploaders identify
> copies of the same image that already exist online? Or to flag
> potential copyvios for reviewers
Yes O:-)
Checkout
Samuel Klein, 06/02/2014 22:41:
How could they improve attribution?
What Phoebe said. A link to each history page *might* be enough but,
especially if they're ebooks, a full list of names costs little (even
though it can be ugly).
What download formats or APIs would we like to see to enabl
John Resig has just published some excellent data analysis combining
TinEye, image archives, and image clustering and deduplication to
identify identical and similar images across a large corpus.
http://ejohn.org/research/computer-vision-photo-archives/
Are we doing any commons analysis like this
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> I'm meeting with the Boundless team tomorrow.
>
> How could they improve attribution?
Looking at the g-book that James linked (and without paying for a download
etc) I don't see any particular attribution at all in the book itself. The
insid
On 6 February 2014 21:41, Samuel Klein wrote:
> I'm meeting with the Boundless team tomorrow.
Excellent!
> How could they improve attribution?
> What download formats or APIs would we like to see to enable reposting
> to Wikibooks, or better cross-platform collaboration?
Yeah, this is it. O
I'm meeting with the Boundless team tomorrow.
How could they improve attribution?
What download formats or APIs would we like to see to enable reposting
to Wikibooks, or better cross-platform collaboration?
Is anyone on wikibooks currently working on importing such materials,
in Tamil or English
Thanks Sam, your answer warms my soul!
And you summarize my key points excellent, (and clearer than I managed
myself)
@Gerard: Our visions are very close and I support yours in general. On a
more concrete level it seems we have some different views, it could be
misundertandings from my side,
@Anders: I seem to have unintentionally derailed your excellent
thread. My apologies; I've taken responses to that subthread
offline. To return to your main point: we do need 'A strategy for
semi-automated article generation; and inclusion of Wikidata'.
Anders Wennersten writes:
< [we] will no
REMINDER: This meeting starts in 30 minutes.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Praveena Maharaj wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The next WMF metrics and activities meeting will take place on Thursday,
> February 6, 2014 at 7:00 PM UTC (11 AM PST). The IRC channel is
> #wikimedia-office on irc.freenode.net
[x-posted]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Language Engineering team will be hosting the monthly IRC
office hour on February 12, 2014 (Wednesday) at 1700 UTC/ 0900 PDT on
#wikimedia-office.
This time we would be talking about the recent changes made to the
Universal Language Selector (ULS) - the MediaWiki
12 matches
Mail list logo
