I agree with Strainu's comments above.
I described some issues with adopting policies and ill-fitting policies
under the Community Governance capacity page, in the Community Capacity
Development program:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Capacity_Development/Community_governance
A.
>
>
> Verifiability can be very different. For example oral sources
very agree, the intangible sources are a really challenge to way you look
at verifiability. Not only are wanting to gather the information and make
it possible for others to also access it the very nature of the sources is
IMO we need to work on the issue of undisclosed paid editing from a number
of different sides:
1) We need to get the word out to the wider world that paying someone to
write your Wikipedia article is inappropriate. We also need to publicly
state which companies have been banned / blocked from
Verifiability can be very different. For example oral sources.
JP
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017, 05:20 John Erling Blad, wrote:
> Policy should not have local variations, unless you want to create
> something different from Wikipedia. This is about core content policies.
> Those are no
Hi Katherine,
Thanks for sharing the draft. It looks like there's an attempt to create a
grand vision in that document. I feel that the document should be
simplified and shortened.
I'm concerned about scope creep. It looks to me like the scope of the
vision is so sweeping that WMF is moving in
One would certainly aspire to be on time and on budget, but the reality of
complex engineering projects is that surprises happen. Developing a new
product isn't like building products on an assembly line where time and
cost are relatively easy to predict.
I think that looking for managers who are
Pine,
If you allow yourself to think that on time and on budget are optional,
then you will certainly not get them. I would expect the WMF to aspire to
deliver products that are fit for purpose, on time and on budget. I would
also expect the staff and, especially, management to be held
Hi Joady,
Does the title "Chief Product Officer" mean that WMF intends to revert the
name of the Audiences department back to the Product department?
"On time and budget" is a goal that can be very difficult to achieve with
complex engineering projects that often encounter surprises. WMF has
Great, thanks for the info!
Denise Jansen
Projectleider
Wikimedia Nederland
tel. 06 2952 0069
(ma, di, do)
*Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:*
Postbus 167Mariaplaats 3
3500 AD Utrecht
Hello!
As many of you know, Wikimania 2017 will take place in Montréal, Canada
from 9–13 August.
If you cannot attend this year, there are still opportunities to follow
along remotely. Keynote sessions will be livestreamed [1] and recorded
throughout the conference on YouTube [2] and Facebook
2017-08-08 12:20 GMT+03:00 John Erling Blad :
> Policy should not have local variations, unless you want to create
> something different from Wikipedia.
Each version of Wikipedia is a different encyclopedia. There are
vastly different inclusion policies and general policies
Policy should not have local variations, unless you want to create
something different from Wikipedia. This is about core content policies.
Those are no original research, verifiability, and neutral point of view.
The one most don't follow is neutral point of view, where projects rewrite
world
Thank you Natacha for the update on the French situation.
What would really make me happy this week would be to witness a goodwill or
wikilove gesture by the French board: let the members who were recently
expelled join up again so that we can hold some meaningful discussions.
Gabe
Le 8 août 2017
Dear All,
More than a quarter of Wikimedia France’s members have requested that several
topics be added and voted upon at he next general assembly to be held in
september in order to reflect on the current governance issues.
The board has just confirmed that the minimum of members requested
14 matches
Mail list logo