On 14/09/12 18:08, Jan-bart de Vreede wrote:
4) Doesn't every survey contain questions that don't apply to the whole
responding audience?
No, because the answer would not be terribly useful. In all surveys I
have seen in my work life [statistics work -- I don't design much
surveys myself,
On 31/05/13 21:58, Stephen LaPorte wrote:
The minutes of the WMF Board Meeting on April 18-19, 2013 have been
approved and published:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2013-04-18
The meeting's agenda included:
[...]
I also see under Fundraising Agreements that Sue updated the
. In particular, it
was determined that our president did not have to resign during the
selection process.
The main people taking part in the recruiting committee were Chantal
Ebongué, Ilario Valdelli and Frédéric Schütz, who followed the entire
process. Several other people from the board, the staff, our
On 11/02/14 06:33, phoebe ayers wrote:
I want to draw your attention to two Wikimedia Board of Trustees decisions
that were recently published, regarding funds allocated to the FDC/Annual
plan grant process and Board approval of chapter/thematic organization
status. In a nutshell, the Board
On 11/02/14 09:03, phoebe ayers wrote:
Hi Phoebe,
thanks for your answer !
It is indeed up to the WMF to decide the conditions a group must have
achieved before being recognized as a chapter or thematic organization.
However, this is an assessment at a given point in time. How the group
Hi Erik,
I personally like all these ideas a lot (and I also agree with most of
the comments that have been made so far); in particular, the fact that
you mention both the server and the client side (as well as other
communities) is very appealing to me.
Within Wikimedia CH, this is an idea that
On 04/07/14 00:26, rupert THURNER wrote:
did anybody of you already have contact with the red cross or the icrc?
concerning wikipedia, offline, commons, maps, wikinews? would there be
any topic interesting for a cooperation?
Yes; one librarian from the ICRC photo department recently visited
On 28/11/14 23:49, Lodewijk wrote:
maybe as a little background: Charles Andres, who you're responding to, is
actually an employee of Wikimedia CH. Your response might still be valid -
I can't judge that - but it sounds odd to me as a relative outsider :)
Indeed, I think Patricia missed the
On 29/11/14 10:05, Lodewijk wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. It's surprising to me that posting a bank
account number could lead to fraud - the bank systems are supposed to be
robust enough for that.
My understanding is this is mostly a problem in the US, from what I
heard from Garfield.
